~by: Howard Lee~

Ric O’Barry, marine mammal specialist and the man behind the Academy Award winning film, “The Cove”, is in Singapore for a dialogue session on 4 October to talk about his work to end dolphin exploitation. As part of his visit, he also attempted to open a dialogue with Resorts World Sentosa (RWS) on returning their captured dolphins, headed for RWS’s marine park attraction, to their original home in the Solomon Islands.

O’Barry, formerly a highly successful dolphin trainer for the “Flipper” television series, had his life-changing moment when one of the dolphins under his care died in his arms, whereupon he realised the error of attempting to confine and train dolphins. From then on, he has spent the last 40 years working to free dolphins around the world through his films and campaigns with local communities and authorities.

Barely hours of his landing in Singapore, I managed to call O’Barry for a tele-interview and got his views on his work, animal rights efforts in Singapore, and what ACRES has been doing.

_______

Film and the Internet figured heavily in your projects. What are the benefits of the media that makes you want to use it?

The Internet and Facebook has changed everything, as corporations can no longer lie and get away. They will be exposed. What we capture on film is clear evidence that the capture of dolphins for conservation and research purposes is a lie. And we were able to reach millions through social media and get their signatures of support. Organisations used to be able to get away with their lies before the age of Internet. Now, they are just shown to be inherently hypocritical.

I see a lot of perseverance and dedication in what you do. Do you think you are a dying breed in the world?

I don’ think so. “The Cove”, for instance, has created thousands of activists. If I used to feel alone, I don’t any more.

What have you heard of conservation and animal rights efforts in Singapore and what is your opinion of these efforts?

I only know of the one by ACRES to try and get the RWS dolphins back to the Solomon Islands. As part of our international campaign to save dolphins, they have my support and the support of millions. And I see that it is primarily a good thing for Singapore as a whole. If ACRES succeeds, it will be a positive windfall of publicity around the world for Singapore and for RWS, as people who care. Of course, the biggest winners will be the dolphins, as they get to return to their rightful home in the Solomon Islands.

What is your opinion on what RWS and the authorities have done so far?

I believe that RWS and the Singapore authorities can have an immeasurable impact on our youths by admitting they made a mistake and releasing the dolphins. RWS doesn’t need to have wild dolphins in their marine park, it is complete and perfect as an attraction by itself.

Looking at your projects around the world, you must have been branded a “foreign interference” many times. I can assure you that such sentiments will be prevalent in Singapore. How would you respond to this?

The 25 dolphins do not have Singapore passports. They belong in the Solomon Islands. The capture and traffic of dolphins is an international problem, and we all have an equal responsibility to do them right.

What has been the role of governments in your projects, particularly where they have been part of the negotiation process? What do you hope to see from Singapore’s government in the RWS dolphins case?

We are working with the Solomon Island authorities for a complete ban on the capture of wild dolphins. You, know, the Solomon Island people have been hunting dolphins for more than 450 years, and yet they can do this with us! Singapore has no reason to want the dolphins. I see my effort in the Solomon Island authorities as one of teach and learn – understand their position, but let them know that what they are doing is not sustainable. If the people of the Solomon Islands can stop, so can RWS and Singapore.

What will you say to the dolphin trainers and those tasked with working for RWS dolphin project? Bearing in mind that theirs is probably a job that puts food on the table.

They can be redeployed to train the dolphins, to help and prepare them for their return to the wild. It is a long term project that will take years, and there is no reason why they should not be able to do so.

Can we expect to see you here more often, helping ACRES campaign for RWS to let the dolphins go?

Yes. I fully support what ACRES is doing. If they need me, I will be here.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

After DBS “rescues” Chennai bank, SIA now in talks with Tata to “save” Air India

It was reported earlier this month that DBS India has gone ahead…

Heng: Reserves may be put to use to finance second support package

The Singapore government is not ruling out the need to utilise past…

飘向南方的悲歌:缅甸未成年女移工

本月15日,《联合早报》报导Casa女佣中介公司,因非法引进14岁缅甸女佣,而被罚5千元。 据人力部文告,有关中介公司未自行对女佣年龄进行确认,而是单纯依靠海外代理人提供资料。当局实在去年7月,在人力部服务中心发现该女佣,后者在接受官方问话时,坦承自己只有17岁。 然而,以上新闻只是冰山一角,在新加坡,又有多少未成年的缅甸女移工,隐瞒自己的年龄,承受着他们未成熟心智足以应对的压力,离乡背井只为养活家乡的父母? 缅国政策:女国民禁出国打工 自2014年起,缅甸国家政策不允许女性国民到国外工作。尽管如此,仍有中介前往缅甸偏乡,哄骗贫穷家庭的子女,出国工作。 由于偏乡家庭普遍贫穷,中介会告诉这些家庭,他们的儿女来新加坡工作可获得优渥薪水,足以养活全家,但却不会告诉他们,未成年出国打工,是违法的。 据新加坡法规,要成为家庭女佣,年龄需至少23岁。但是在缅甸的中介,可以以金钱和关系疏通政府单位,篡改这些女佣的实际年龄。 在缅甸,协助办理工作准证俨然成为一门生意,在移民厅外也有代理,以225新元收费协助篡改护照上的年龄。 由于这些缅甸少女出国需付还一笔巨额中介费,为担心合约中断和赔偿,加上中介警告,他们也只好隐瞒年龄。 早在2016年,半岛电视台(Al Jazeera)即揭露未成年女佣到新加坡工作的课题,遗憾的是,该媒体在今年跟进报导,发现问题仍存在。 发生不少缅甸女佣从高楼坠下事件,引起半岛电视台记者注意,深入调查后发现,尽管政府已严法禁止未成年女佣入境,仍有许多像怀怀和欣欣这些入世未深的偏乡少女,被骗来新加坡工作。…