~by: Ghui~


On paper, Singapore is an astonishing success. From a fishing outpost to a world class city. From an island with nothing to a vibrant economy.

Singapore has hosted many international events such as the F1, which showcases all the riches and grandeur we have to offer. Scant attention however, is paid to the less savoury aspects of society that exist in every city. In image conscious Singapore, it is “out of sight, out of mind”. If we hide away the uglier aspects of society, we can pretend that poverty and problems do not exist in our island of utopia.

I am generalising of course. Don’t get me wrong, there are many wonderful things about Singapore for which I am grateful for.

However, I cannot help but wonder if the sweeping of problems under the carpet have made us ignorant, shallow, devoid of compassion and empathy. Some might argue that it is the government’s policy of promoting economic growth at all cost that is to blame. In pushing growth, the less able have to make way for the “elites” to forge their way forward. Perhaps, but there is no point in laying blame. To go forward, we all have to take collective responsibility.

The double tragedy at Bedok Reservoir highlighted two issues:

  1. a lack of understanding on mental wellbeing and a refusal to acknowledge that mental health issues are real problems that are a part of our society (any society for that matter); and
  2. an absence of compassion and empathy with a strong dose of self righteousness.

Take Glenn Ong’s derisive attitude towards people suffering from mental health issues for instance (see HERE). He did not pause to consider the impact of his callous words on people who are grappling with mental illnesses. Nor did he stop to think about how his comments would fuel further ignorance. Is he ignorant himself?

Mental illness is not something that can simply be dismissed as crazy individuals who mumble to themselves in public or who attack others randomly. Indeed, mental health issues are deeply complicated and afflict rich or poor alike. There are also many different types of mental conditions which range in severity.

Depression, Bi-polar disorder, schizophrenia are but some examples of mental illnesses and the symptoms of each could not be more different. As such, mental conditions cannot be pigeon-holed or generalised as “stark raving mad”. Many people suffering from these ailments are functioning individuals with jobs and who contribute to society.  They are just like you and I. They simply have problems, which can be treated if adequately addressed.

More than ever, we as a society must come to understand the concept of mental illness. It is not something to be feared. It is simply like any other disease which requires support and treatment. If we can recognise diseases such as cancer, why not mental conditions? If we shy away from a problem, we compound the problem by introducing fear and ignorance. Fear felt by sufferers who dare not ask for help or who may not even realise that they need help and fear by society who is in turn too ignorant to offer the much needed support!

Housewife, Tan Sze Sze clearly needed help and support. Her mind was in a turmoil and more likely than not, she was suffering from some level of depression. Perhaps it was our collective societal ignorance, which led to her inability to recognise the symptoms of depression such that it spiralled out of control?

Maybe if our society had been more open with discussing mental illnesses, this tragedy could have been prevented. Because people do not understand what mental illnesses entail, they do not recognise the symptoms and people who need treatment do not get it. Alternatively, sufferers may realise that they have a problem but refuse to come to terms with it and seek help for it because they fear judgment.

The concepts of mental conditions could possibly be introduced in the education system at secondary school level such that awareness about the existence of such ailments are created at a young age. That way, students will understand it and with understanding, comes acceptance which would in turn, lead to an increased ability to handle and come to terms with the reality mental illnesses. That way, society would be equipped to help people like Tan Sze Sze and prevent a needless tragedy.

At the aftermath of Tan Sze Sze’s suicide, people have been fast and furious in adding their two cents worth. Some have condemned her for killing her child. Others have denounced her as a bad mother. Still others have been more concerned with their water supplies and housing prices. In our rush to pass judgment, we have forgotten that she was a person who needed help but was unable to get it. Pushed to a corner, she felt she had no choice.

In desperation, she chose the only option she deemed available.  Is it her fault alone?

I hope that through this, we can collectively work towards preventing another senseless tragedy. Coming to terms with the fact that mental illness exists in all sectors of society in all countries is a start. There is no taboo. There is no shame.


Picture credit: the|G|™

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

年底两家游轮拟复航 网民忧重演“钻石公主号”

随着新加坡旅游局发布消息,将会在年底复航两家以我国为母港的游轮后,相关公司将会提供和堪比陆地住宿价格来的更安全的旅行,网民都对此表示欢迎,却有不少网民认为不应该这么快复苏航程,害怕“钻石公主”号事件重演。 云顶星梦邮轮“世界梦号”将于11月6日起试航,而皇家加勒比国际游轮“海洋量子号”则会在12月开始起航,两家公司都正在申请安全出航认证。 云顶邮轮公司将会推出两晚和三晚的行程,价格分别为359元和599元,而13岁及以上的乘客必须在出发当天,进行60元的强制性鼻拭检测。 皇家加勒比公司则会提供三晚和四晚的旅程,费用各为374元和509元。 据《海峡时报》报导,邮轮公司表示,虽然不会提供自助餐,但是大部分的船上活动都会照常进行。 皇家加勒比集团亚太区执行董事Angie Stephen指出,其游轮价格会和陆地上的酒店住宿配套相称,或来得更低。她指出,虽然有消费者担心可能会发生类似今年初“钻石公主”号上的情况,但是现在所筹备的旅游配套都会比在岸上逗留来得更安全。 “重要的是,人们必须意识到,钻石公主号事件事发生在今年1月和2月,当时全球并不知道冠状病毒19所带来的影响,更不用说如何去遏止它。” 她说,除了新加坡安全管理的规定之外,批准出航的游轮还会采取其他措施,如登船之前的检查。若在船上发现有确诊病例,皇家加勒比将会使用蓝牙联系追踪,以隔离曾和确诊病例有密切接触过的人们。 星梦邮轮总裁兼云顶邮轮国际销售部主管吴明发(Michael Goh)则指出,该公司一直在台湾经营国内邮轮,没有出现过任何意外。 他指出,今年早些时候,该公司的两艘船只还被用于安置康复中的外国客工,这些经验都为船员提供了非常有用的培训。…

MAS survey: Economists downgrade Singapore growth forecast, recession may loom

Based on the results from a quarterly poll released on Wednesday (11…

How’s the economy doing? Watch PM’s shirt colour.

Anyone noticed the grey shirt that Prime Minister Lee wore at his National Day Rally? Last year he wore pink. Last night, he wore grey. A colour to suit the times – or to show empathy with S’poreans?