excerpted from Social Dimension Online:


The last and possibly most damaging case against Western-style social welfare is that it is financially unsustainable and will eventually bankrupt the state. At a seminar on Singapore’s Central Provident Fund (CPF) last year, a senior politician likened European pay-as-you-go pensions to political Ponzi schemes that were never going to pay up on their promises. This view is misinformed. It is true that pensions constitute the heaviest fiscal burden among all sources of social spending in Europe and have come under pressure from population ageing and economic stagnation. But this area is complex and dynamic. Research done at the London School of Economics has found that reforms in recent years have addressed policy constraints to different extents across Europe and in some cases have put pension systems back on a more sustainable path. The reference to Ponzi schemes is also disingenuous because it fails to recognise how these pensions have helped many generations of older persons in Europe avoid poverty and retire with a sense of financial independence and personal dignity. Sociological studies have shown that these pensions often enable older adults to contribute to their adult children as they look to establish their own families and careers. In contrast, the majority of elderly Singaporeans are compelled to rely on their adult children for financial security, even though retirees are likely to have fewer children in future. Can we say that either system is more sustainable?

The weakest argument against the fiscal sustainability of Western welfare is probably that it led to the current economic crisis. It did not. The current economic crisis gripping Europe may be due to many things, such as negligent regulation of banking practices or even inherent flaws in modern capitalism, but it was not due to the welfare state. The misperception may have arisen from the sweeping cuts to welfare spending that countries have made. But in this case, the site of treatment does not indicate the source of ailment.


Read the rest of the article HERE.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

转移阵地!TikTok母公司拟到我国扩张业务

TikTok所属公司,北京字节跳动公司(Bytedance),正计划将新加坡作为亚洲区的抢滩首地,借此扩张业务。 据路透社报导,有消息人士称因美国总统特朗普政府的压力,TikTok被迫出售其在美国的业务。因此正寻找有潜力的国家,斥资数十亿元,为当地开近百的工作职缺。 北京字节跳动科技公司,目前是全球最具价值的初创企业(Startup),在遭遇印度、英国和美国的打击后,正推进其业务到亚洲各地。 创办人张一鸣,长期以来关注拥有6.5亿人口的东南亚,而许多跨国企业,如阿里巴巴集团控股和腾讯控股也进军东南亚。消息人士称,北京字节跳动科技公司的计划,包括在我国建立数据中心。 旗下业务包括如今火遍全球的TikTok和Lark科技。北京字节跳动在中国的业务也包括中国版TikTok抖音,以及新运营的新闻应用程式 《今日头条》,预计每月将会有15亿活跃用户。 据了解,北京字节跳动科技公司2019年的收入已超越170亿美元,并创造了逾30亿美元(约41亿元)的净利润。 而亚洲如今也是该公司锁定的目标,尤其在被迫售出美国的业务后。美国总统特朗普于昨日(10日)表示,将不会延长交易期限至15日。 除了美国的打压,印度也曾为TikTok用户最多的国家之一,但由于中印边境冲突恶化,印度政府忧心安心问题,从而禁止印度使用TikTok。 软银集团也为印度业务寻找竞购者;英国政府则对TikTok的信息安全存疑,因而禁止TikTok入驻英国。 如今北京字节跳动已组成财团向金融管理局申请数码银行执照。其中成员包括华侨银行的李氏家族。

【武汉冠状病毒】王瑞杰:准备第二应对配套 疫情恶化或动用储备金

副总理兼财政部长王瑞杰指出,根据武汉冠转病毒(Covid-19)在我国的疫情来看,不排除政府将会动用储备金,推出第二个应对疫情冲击的配套。 他今天在MONEY FM89.3的直播访谈节目时指出,不排除有关的可能性,若真的动用储备金,即意味着政府需非常审慎看待有关的选项,且必须先征得总统和总统顾问理事会的同意。 他指出,基于必须预算处所需要的配套有多大,需要多少应急款额,因此政府目前正在计算各个不同的数目。 王瑞杰今早在出席由《海峡时报》和《商业时报》联办的圆桌论坛时,也曾提及动用储备金的事项。 “储备金是未雨绸缪,但是看来现在这场雨不小……我正在探讨不同的选项。” 他表示,诚如他之前曾在财政预算案中提到的,本届政府的现有储备非常充足,但是也有可能会动用积累储备,且必须像面对全球金融危机半,必须仔细讨论每个选项。 日前在财政预算案辩论上,王瑞杰就指出,国家储备金是建国一代领袖的远见,让后人得以乘凉。而冠毒疫情若进一步恶化,可能会有需要动用储备金,且不会终止消费税调涨计划,以便“现在种树给后人乘凉”。

14% of recovered & discharged patients in Guangdong retested positive for Covid-19

Of the patients who have recovered from Covid-19 and discharged from hospitals…

Just for laughs…

Just thought I’d share this with everyone – for a laugh. Or…