the following is a statement delivered by Ms Braema Mathi, President of MARUAH, at the 18th Regular Session of the UN Human Rights Council, Universal Periodic Review (UPR) Plenary on Singapore.


Thank you, Madam President. I am making this statement as a representative of Article 19, an international political and civil rights group and MARUAH, human rights NGO in Singapore.

Madam President, I speak as civil society working within Singapore. Much has changed in Singapore since the State under Review event on May 6th. The General Election on May 7th was a watershed the ruling party – People’s Action Party – saw its popularity drop to an all time low of 60.14 per cent, and it lost a Group Representation Constituency – whereby five candidates stand on a single ballot – to the Opposition, leading to the loss of two Cabinet Ministers.

Last month, an unprecedented four candidates contested the Presidential Elections. It was hard-fought, and finally the former Deputy Prime Minster, Dr Tony Tan became President with about 35 per cent of votes

My colleagues and I believe that Singapore is poised for change. The people want more space, more say in policy-making discussions, and more freedom to express themselves without just resorting to the anonymity of social media.

There is a definite expressed change in the relationship between the government and the people. The citizens are making their views known. Post-election analyses done by think-tanks, political parties, civil society reflect a chasm between the people and the government. Much of the dissatisfaction centres around access to job opportunities, lack of – perceived or real –  adequate protection against foreigners taking jobs, rise in costs of living especially on housing and a frustration of  still being  ‘nannied’ by the government which limits political and civil liberties for the citizens, for their own good and based on fear.

Given this backdrop, Madam President, it is imperative that the government loosens its grip on the civil and political freedoms for its people and also increases transparency on its decisions and policies.

As such it is disheartening that these elections and after  acknowledging a readiness to change – the government has not supported the civil and political liberty recommendations (38 of the 114 in the Working Group on the UPR report ((A/HRC/18/11) in the outcome report.

There was also no support for the setting up in due course of a national human rights institution or the ratification of International Treaties such as the ICCPR or the ICESCR or the Optional Protocols to CEDAW or CRC. ( Recommendation 96.22 – 96.24; 96.1- 96.18)

Thus much will remain status quo – defamation laws, Newspaper Printing and Publishing Act, laws for preventive detention, no moratorium on the death penalty, no anti-discrimination laws.

A case in point –  last week, Malaysia announced that it will abolish its Internal Security Act, the main source of its powers of preventive detention. Just one day later, the Singapore government announced that it will not do the same, even though our legislation is historically linked to Malaysia’s.

The elections may have changed many things, but certainly not our civil liberties in Singapore. Please do know that we congratulate our government for wanting to ratify the Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities and setting up a multi-agency taskforce to study the Palermo Protocol and the implications.

The government of Singapore has done many things right. They have succeeded at many things. Nevertheless Singaporeans remain frustrated at the continued stifling of rights, by a government that is still too cautious.

MARUAH urges our government to work towards civil and political liberties as a priority focus for the next UPR. We will play our part. I  thank all members of the HRC community for their valuable contributions in this discussion.


Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

浪费空间!国大建筑客座教授非议有盖走道设计

新加坡国立大学建筑系客座教授郑庆顺,周日(13日)在脸书发文非议我国一些有盖人行道的设计。他在贴文分享照片,指某有盖走道至少一米的空间没有被善用,是“糟糕的设计”。 “如果能够将柱子安放在挡土墙的顶端,并将排水沟覆盖上,人行道的宽度会更宽,而且成本反而更低。” 在发文的数分钟后,郑庆顺再次上传另一张不同的人行道照片,更指该人行道的设计比起上一张更适合。 “这个设计更好,有更多的空间,柱子在边缘以此去掉笨拙的基础建设。”他表示。 另一方面,脸书专页《Singaporeans supporting the government because of covered walkways”》也分享了郑庆顺的帖文,揶揄行人道的糟糕设计。…

MRT doors allegedly fail to remain open after elderly man’s leg stuck between gap at train platform after emergency button is pressed

On Thursday (13 June) a netizen by the name Francesco Mikhail highlighted…

Half time report of the Hougang by-elections

~ By Howard Lee ~ Five days of hustings have passed and I am…