~by: Donaldson Tan~


Nuclear energy first gained public attention in Singapore when the Economic Strategy Committee (ESC) rallied the government to consider nuclear energy in February 2010. The ESC recommended that Singapore should begin studying the feasibility of nuclear energy as an option because the process of developing nuclear energy is likely to take at least 15 years. Subsequently, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs announced at the Tehran Nuclear Conference that the Singapore government has embarked on such a feasibility study.

However, it turned out that the Singapore government had already set its eye on nuclear energy before Economic Strategy Committee had put forward its recommendations in 2010. According to WikiLeaks, as early as November 2008, the then Deputy CEO of the Energy Market Authority Lawrence Wong had indicated to the US Embassy that the Singapore government does not rule out nuclear power. Today, Wong is the Member of Parliament for West Coast GRC and the Minister of State for Defence & Education.

Wong told the US Embassy that the Singapore government would like to take steps to reduce its dependency on piped natural gas (PNG) which originates from neighbouring countries. Official data affirms that PNG accounts for 76% of Singapore’s electricity fuel mix while 80% of the PNG comes from Indonesia and the remaining 20% comes from Malaysia. Industry analysts expect production of natural gas in Indonesia and Malaysia to begin decline by 2016 and 2012 respectively.

According to Wong, nuclear energy is one of the options being seriously considered by the government to diversify Singapore’s energy supply. However, he added that this is a long-term prospect, perhaps 20 or 30 years down the road. The government intends to create the conditions such that the government can respond in an informed manner when the time comes that the private sector determines if it makes economic sense to build a nuclear nuclear power plant in Singapore.

Wong also stressed that Singapore lacks the land area to create a 30km safety buffer around a nuclear power plant. Another short-coming is that a typical nuclear reactor would generate about one-sixth of Singapore’s power needs. This means Singapore would have to come up with elaborate contingency plans to avoid big disruptions if the reactor ever had to be shut down. The government believes that technology will one day overcome these 2 short-comings. In particular, Singapore is waiting to see if the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Committee approves pebble bed reactor technology, which holds out the prospect of moving to multiple mini-reactors that need only small buffer areas.

Wikileaks also revealed that the government has envisioned a role for the Economic Development Board (EDB). It is noted that Singapore has an advanced, high-tech manufacturing sector, but it does not include nuclear-related products and services. The EDB would like promote investment by foreign firms that offer nuclear-related products or services to develop its own domestic capabilities in this area. The intent is to develop Singapore as a base for nuclear technology related products or services in Asia.

Wikileaks is certainly a treasure trove of information. It has illuminated the direction of Singapore’s nuclear energy ambition and provides a clearer picture of what the government is considering. Earlier this year (March 2011), the Singapore government revealed its intention to build an underground nuclear power reactor. Now the picture is clearer. A pebble bed reactor is sufficiently small enough to be installed underground. At the same time, we can certainly reaffirm that the adoption of nuclear power will have an industrial impact on Singapore’s economy in the future.


This article first appeared on New Asia Republic (see HERE). TOC thanks NAR for allowing us to reproduce it in full here.

picture credit: Wikimedia Commons

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

堂哥罗尔伟报警指控罗弥伦 涉嫌转移一家公司账户到自身户口

陷入收购英超球会、奥巴马合照造假风波的狮城富豪罗氏堂兄弟,传出堂兄指控堂弟,涉嫌转移一家公司账户到自身户口! 据《海峡时报》报导,43岁的罗尔伟(Terence Loh),是在本月28日报警,指责堂弟罗弥伦(Nelson Loh),涉嫌在今年4月27日至5月5日之间,把总值525万元的款项,从红酒分销公司Giron的三个银行户口,转移到罗弥伦个人账户。 当时,Giron公司的三位董事包括罗尔伟的姐姐Marjory、罗弥伦的妻子Lee Chai Hoon,以及Lynn Yeow女士。 Lynn Yeow是在今年5月离开Giron公司,也指自己在职时负责广告和营销事务,不清楚有关未经授权转账的指控。 警方已证实案件仍在调查中。 新加坡会计与企业管理局(ACRA)的记录则显示,Giron公司目前处在“破产在管”(In…

疑教唆女佣虐待雇主幼女 人力部调查涉案中介

涉嫌教唆思乡心切的女佣采取非常手段,将雇主女儿的小手放入锅中“煮”的中介,已经引起人力部的关注,当局已展开调查,确认对方是否触犯了雇佣中介法令。 日前一名本地母亲在脸书上帖文,指她所雇佣不到一个月的女佣,数度要求回到缅甸的家乡,随后经过中介的面谈才被安抚。岂知不到一个月,女佣却拉着她那不到17个月大小女儿的手到烹饪中的锅中“煮”,甚至谎称一切都是意外,至到母亲在电眼记录中查看,才揭发有关的虐待事件。 而经过母亲的追问,女佣才指出是中介教导她这样做才能回家,令母亲感叹“这中介的心太黑了”。 母亲也表示,除了之前闹着要回乡,女佣和家人相处良好,然而事发时,中介却反指该名母亲曾虐待女佣,甚至踢女佣的头部,令她感到难以置信。 据《今日报》报导,该名母亲在受访时表示有关事件已经造成孩子的阴影,现在孩子每晚都会哭泣,连睡觉也在哭,且非常惧怕陌生人,更不愿意被其他人抱。她也补充说,其大女儿也受到影响,非常自责自己没有保护好妹妹。 网友建议将孩子送托管中心 网民们在脸书上纷纷对此事表示抱歉,希望女童早日康复,更怒斥女佣和中介“丧尽天良”、“没人性”,还希望他们遭到以牙还牙的惩罚。 “这种事情,直接以牙还牙,给他双手烫了”、“若真的是中介唆使,应该判重刑,在关闭这一间中介公司,把他列入黑名单,永远不准再开公司害人。” 不少网民也表示,既然夫妻俩决定了要生孩子,就必须有一人牺牲事业,在家中带孩子10是岁后,才放手追逐事业。如果家中有老人家,聘请佣人看顾并让老人家负责监督工作,也会比较好。 有者也建议将孩子送到托管中心,比交给女佣照顾来的更好,不要为了省钱而导致孩子受到伤害。 他们都认为不能全面相信女佣的为人,因为我们并不了解外劳们的心态。

Netizens point out that social class divide in the education system is real, contrary to what Dr Janil said

Co-founder of ReadAble Michelle MoMo Yeo took to her Facebook to highlight…

Man in India produces video testimonies of 2 ex-orphans saying they sang his song in 1983

In the ongoing copyright saga of ‘Count on Me Singapore’, Joseph Mendoza…