Ho HW –

Why has there been an 80% rise in HDB flat pricing between two sale launches (direct from HDB) of Havelock View? The construction costs are the same, and the flats get handed over at the same time.

At the first sale launch during SERS (2006/07), a 4-room flat cost an average of $250k (inclusive of compensation). At the 2nd sale launch during the Balance of Sale balloting exercise (2009), a 4-room flat was going at an average of $450k. The 3-room flats also had an 80% raise in price.

Some may conclude that SERS projects get a special price, thus the big difference, but I would like to add that my friend got his Membina Court flat direct from HDB at a neighbouring estate in 2006/07 (not from SERs) at $270k for a mid-floor unit. It had the same price hike in the subsequent Balance of Sales launch direct from HDB and I do not think that Membina Court is a SERS project.

Why has the government/HDB allowed such sudden rises in pricing for its housing?

The government has made it look like a good buy, as the balloted flats seem slightly cheaper than the resale market. But the resale market valuation has been jacked up too! Why should HDB flats direct from HDB be pegged to market resale price in the first place? These are not private flats.

Where is the initial commitment to provide affordable housing for Singaporeans?

Every Singaporean is given a chance to purchase a HDB-subsidized flat from the government. So why the 80% raise in pricing?

Did the government/HDB suddenly realize that they have been missing out on reaping profits from good locations like Havelock View? Is that why they raised the price of HDB flats by 80% at one go, instead of a more gradual raise?

Are there not lucrative proceeds from the Zion Road land sale by relocating the residents to Havelock View? Is that not enough?

Can the 80% raise in HDB pricing for flats direct from HDB be justified when the flats are in the same estate, have same construction cost and are handed over at the same time?

A 20-30% rise perhaps within 2 to 3 years for a flat direct from HDB may have been more reasonable or justifiable if HDB flats cannot be pegged to our national inflation rates. Our wages have not increased by 80% in 2 to 3 years time.

The prospects of paying $200k more over 30 years than your neighbours who got same the flats at the same time as you is rather daunting, especially when it is NOT A RESALE FLAT but flats direct from HDB amidst periods of such economic uncertainty.

The Government needs to justify the ridiculous price hike. If not, they should be reviewing the price of the Havelock View balloted flats or do something at least.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Future media: Evolution of a discerning public

~by: Howard Lee~ When the Singapore Press Club closed its forum discussion…

Nobel Prize-winning economist cites Li Shengwu’s “Credible Mechanisms” as 2018’s most significant economics research paper

A paper co-authored by Harvard University’s Economics associate professor Li Shengwu was…

PM Lee pledges a just and fair society

SPEECH BY PRIME MINISTER LEE HSIEN LOONG AT THE SWEARING-IN CEREMONY HELD…

收到大量反馈 林志蔚:将一一检视冀选民耐心等待

工人党自拿下盛港集选区后,便马不停蹄开始工作,除了准备接手盛港集选区市镇会,他们也接收到大量选民的问题和反馈。 盛港议员林志蔚今日在脸书上表示,呼吁选民耐心等待,给予工人党更多时间,深入了解每位选民所反映的问题。 “我们的志工也在协助我们仔细地检视每个个案。我们了解可能会需要一些时间,可是我们想要做出正确的选择,所以请耐心等待,我们会尽快为你解决问题。” 此外,林志蔚也表示,选民可以多多利用工人党的社交媒体专页,将祝贺和鼓励透过社交媒体转达,而选民则可以透过电子邮件和热线管道表达所面临问题。 “虽然我们非常感激来自选民的祝贺和鼓励,但我们向让电子邮件和热线能够成为选民申诉的管道,选民也可以将祝贺和鼓励透过脸书传达给我们。” 林志蔚的发文在短短三小时内获得了逾3千次赞,187次转载。网友纷纷响应林志蔚的呼吁,称应给予他们更多时间处理事务,并表示将会耐心等待。 工人党盛港团队日前以52.13巴仙对47.87巴仙,拿下盛港集选区。近日,工人党团队何廷儒、林志蔚、辣玉莎、蔡庆威也开始接手盛港集选区事务。 根据日前在脸书分享所负责的选区范围,何廷儒负责万国(Buangkok)分区、林志蔚负责安谷(Anchorvale)、辣玉莎负责的康埔桦(Compassvale),蔡庆威负责的河谷(Rivervale)。每位负责人也公开电邮和电话联系资料,方便居民联系。