The Government notes the announcement by Malaysia that it will be replacing its Internal Security Act (ISA) with new legislation aimed at preventing “subversive action, organised violence and criminal acts”.

The ISA in Singapore and Malaysia may have the same roots from the time when both were British colonies, but the two countries and their respective societies have evolved differently over time. Accordingly, the ISA in Singapore has evolved and is now different from that in Malaysia. A person arrested under the ISA in Singapore may be held in custody for up to 30 days after which an Order of Detention or Restriction Order must be issued or else the person must be released unconditionally. In Malaysia, the period of custody is up to 60 days. Also, under the Singapore ISA, since 1991, the President has the power to veto the Government’s decision to detain a detainee if the ISA Advisory Board, which is chaired by a Supreme Court Judge, has recommended the release of the detainee. This was an additional safeguard enacted by the Singapore Government to prevent misuse of the Act.

The Singapore Government has used the ISA sparingly. The ISA has only been used against individuals who have acted in a manner prejudicial to the security of Singapore or to the maintenance of public order or essential services therein. No person has ever been detained only for their political beliefs.

The ISA in Singapore has only been used to deal with threats of subversion, racial and religious extremism (such as inciting racial or religious hatred, strife and violence), espionage and terrorism. These threats continue to be salient today, especially in the last ten years against the threat of terrorism, where the Government’s priority is to act swiftly to prevent an attack from taking place. The arrests made under the ISA in Dec 2001 thwarted the imminent suicide bombings against establishments in Singapore that were planned by Al-Qaeda operatives assisted by several of the arrested Jemaah Islamiyah members, preventing the loss of innocent lives. The ISA continues to be relevant and crucial as a measure of last resort for the preservation of our national security.

Ministry of Home Affairs
16 September 2011

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

One MP says “very fashionable” not to own cars while another drives a big Bentley

Speaking at the launch of a public engagement exercise for the next…

Singaporeans jobs and salaries improve with each generation says MOF report; could Sandwich Generation concerns remain?

A recent Ministry of Finance (MOF) report states younger generations get higher…

吴家和发起 周日办探讨CECA、人口课题集会

失业者互助网站 Transitioning.org创办人吴家和(Gilbert Goh),于来临的周日(11月3日)下午4时至7时,在芳林公园发起集会,欢迎关注移民课题、新印全面经济合作协定(CECA)的民众,踊跃出席。 根据吴家和在昨日发布的贴文,海报上写着“让新加坡再次伟大”,以及“对CECA、拉美斯(Ramesh)和690万人口说不”。 海报上的拉美斯应是指近期因为停车费和公寓保安起政治的印裔高管拉美斯。相信是不满到访友人被征收10元停车费,他回呛保安人员,“我花了150万元买下这个单位”。然而他与保安争执的视频瞬间在社交媒体传开,其态度亦引来许多民众非议。 拉美斯已在今日向有关保安人员道歉。 至于总理李显龙曾在2015年的一次访谈,所谓690万人口实则是制定基础设施的指标,即国内建造铁路、房屋等,有能力应付690万人口为依据。 吴家和在脸书呼吁道,不管是失业者、就业中或不满意现有体制,都欢迎出席,而如果是保安人员,无任欢迎,希望能听听他们的想法。 基于当天预计可能下雨,天气会转凉,现场也将准备热美禄让老人家暖暖身子。 在另一则贴文,吴家和表示目前有500位群众表示将出席或有兴趣出席。他补充也邀请了新加坡前进党秘书长、前总统候选人陈清木医生出席。 陈清木曾在今年8月3日的前进党推介礼致词,呼吁重新检讨新印全面经济合作协定。 “我们需要政府公布CECA的表单,证明究竟多少国人从该协议受益?有多少印度专才前来工作?” 陈清木也认为,政府不能只关注GDP成长,也要有适合经商环境和支持SME和本地企业。…

S’pore ministers having high salaries but not implementing minimum wages is “not normal” and an “abuse”, says blogger Roy Ngerng

In the midst of public concerns over the minimum wage, Taiwanese-based Singaporean…