~by: Ghui~


It is always interesting to read about what other countries have to say about Singapore. However, of late, it is always the usual issues that are talked about.

Liberal papers will write about Singapore’s strict press controls, its lack of freedom of speech and it being a “nanny state”. Economic or business publications will focus on Singapore’s economic miracle or lack thereof, its efficiency and its international business friendly outlook. Tourism write ups will feature Singapore as a melting pot of different cultures, the delectable cuisine, its safety and cleanliness.

What does Singapore mean to Singaporeans?

I have to confess that having been born and bred in Singapore, I tend to view Singapore in a similar light to what is described above. It is therefore most refreshing to read about Singapore in a whole new light – Singapore as both a concrete jungle and a hotbed for nature to thrive (see HERE).

This article by Wayne Arnold for the New York Times certainly gives me a fresh perspective of Singapore. To read about these wonderful creatures living amongst us in what most of us would describe as an urban jungle is certainly a breath of fresh air.

Singapore’s many seemingly contradicting sides – a heady mix of varied cultures with a homogenous government, a vibrant economy with staid control of the same, a garden city, an urban culture created from a jungle, sky scrappers but yet with an underbelly teeming with wildlife that creeps in and catches us unaware – all remind me of Singapore’s beauty in all its multi facetted splendour.

A city at odds with itself at times? Perhaps.

A country of contradictions? Maybe.

Boring?  Never!


Picture credit: The annotated budak

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Motorcyclist dies in accident involving two cars and trailer along SLE

A 45-year-old motorcyclist was killed in an accident involving two cars and…

国大老龄中心研究:近半受访年长者 财务收入仅“刚好应付”开支

根据杜克-新加坡国大老龄中心(CARE)近期发布的一份研究,研究中有近半(49巴仙)受访年长者认为,虽生活上未有困难,但财务收入只能刚好应付生活开支。 杜克新加坡国立大学医学院,老龄研究与教育中心发布《新加坡健康、就业、社交和代际转移研究》报告,研究获得卫生部支持,采访了4千549名,60岁以上的年长新加坡人。 上述研究涵括国内年长群体在身心灵健康、对于医疗保健服务使用程度、社交、社会参与感、代际(财富)转移、终身学习、就业和退休等各方面。 研究其中一项课题,询问年长受访者,他们是否有足够的收入来应付每月家庭开支。 在2017年,有29.5巴仙的60岁以上受访成年人认为,他们有足够的钱应付开支,还有些盈余,但随着年龄增长这个比例减少,例如80岁以上,认为财务够用的受访者仅为25巴仙。 至于近半年长者则反映他们的收入财务只是刚好够用,生活上未有困难。 至于在应付开支上面对一些困难的受访者比例为14.6巴仙,比起2009年13.9巴仙有所增加。至于面对许多困难者,从2009年的2.4巴仙,在2017年增至3.8巴仙。 不过,研究中未衡量受访者的消费和支出。 生活成本、医疗开支增加 研究者认为,年长者面对财务不足,可能来自包括生活成本以及对医疗开支的增长等因素,特别是80岁以上群体面对的财务不足比例最高。 至于在70-79岁年龄层,生活开支上面对一些和许多困难者高达21巴仙。 报告也揭示随着教育程度提升,收入充足程度也增加。他们在家庭外地社交圈子也较稳健。…

被拖欠三个月工资 总计30万元 30客工静坐抗议

被拖欠长达三个月薪资,有30名客工从本周一起,,在罗敏申路79号工地(旧公积金局大厦原址)外,进行静坐抗议。 根据《今日报》报导,这些来自分包商Stargood建筑公司的客工声称,被拖欠工资的客工有59人,总额高达30万元。 其中一名参与静坐抗议、来自中国浙江的客工丁航航(译音)指出,他自己被拖欠三个月,总共1万3000元的薪资。 有关分包商业主林杰彪(译音)则向媒体承认,客工索讨拖欠薪资属实。但他指出其公司也是”受害者“,因主要承包商清水建设(Shimizu Corporation)从去年12月起,就没有支付他任何款项,致使他也无法为客工们发工资。 虽然未收到款项,该分包商仍继续进行在该工地打地基工程,因为”延迟交款几乎成为业界常态“。 当分包商向清水建筑追讨款项时,后者反指分包商在外包材料组装、模板预制和行政等费用加总下,累积50万元欠款。不过,当媒体试图联系清水建筑求证时,后者不愿置评。 本社也已致函清水建筑,寻求后者针对客工抗议拖欠工资一事作出澄清。 工地建办公楼,由星桥腾飞子公司所有 有关工程将在上述公司建设一座29层高的办公楼,预计2020年完成,并由Ascendas Services的子公司Southernwood 房地产所有。…