The following is an excerpt of an article published in Fâneurose

But what I do find interesting is how the the Straits Times article reported on the demographic model’s output based on the “net” immigration rate of 0, 30,000 or 60,000 people per annum. The numbers sound nice and pretty and round, but they blithely ignore the messy realities of life (like all models).

“All models are wrong, but some are useful.” – George Box.

Let me put it this way by using an analogy.

Let’s say you have a cup and you’re trying to fill it with water from a running tap. You get to control how much the tap is turned and so the rate at which water drips into the cup.

Your goal is to control how fast the cup is filling up. Note, this is not the same as the rate at which water comes out of the tap. The goal is to attain a target rate for how fast the cup is filling up.

I have this magic device that can poke holes in the bottom of your cup so that water leaks from the bottom of the cup. This device can also magically seal holes in the bottom of the cup, so leakage rates can change moment to moment.

Again, let me reiterate, the goal is to achieve a target rate of how fast the cup is filling up. You only get to control the tap, not the leaks.

Oh, and lest you forget, how much water you have in your cup changes the leakage rate of water out of your cup. The pressure of a higher water level will of course force water to leak out the bottom faster.

Your job is to maintain a constant rate at which the cup is filled, whether it’s 30,000 units per year or 60,000 units per year.

You also have a natural concern about how full the cup is. That’s because the water is scalding hot and filling it to overflowing will burn you very badly. Oh, and your Mom will beat the crap out of you if the cup becomes too empty.

It doesn’t take a genius to see that the faster the tap is flowing, the harder it is to get your job done correctly.

Continue reading here.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

人权律师叹在狮城诉诸司法不便宜

日前,本地社运分子范国瀚因被判藐视法庭罪而申请上诉,不过他必须先缴两万元的担保金(security for costs),如果上诉失败,这笔担保金也拿不回,令他感叹“正义也不便宜啊!”(Justice is not cheap!)。不过所幸后来他得到总理弟弟李显扬襄助,为他负担这笔费用。 对此,本地人权律师拉维(M.Ravi)就在脸书发文分享,他今早告知马国律师同业阿伦卡西(Arun Kasi),范国瀚上诉需缴两万元担保金,令后者感到惊讶。 他指出,事实上目前马国上诉庭和联邦法院申请上诉,是不需要缴担保金的,过去的费用的一千令吉马币,不过有关收费已在去年取消,确保当事人有申诉正义的管道。 他说,如果没有富有赞助者的襄助,范国瀚可能也会痛失上诉的权利,除了范,还有另一同样被判藐视法庭罪的民主党要陈两裕,也在为筹募两万元上诉担保金头痛。 “这就是在新加坡诉诸司法面对的可悲情况。甚至有时需仰仗有钱有势人家的协助。” 除了抵押金,向法院提呈诉讼的费用也非常贵,增加司法费用。“若说新加坡拥有全球最高昂的诉讼和法庭相关费用,我不会感到惊讶。”…

Mistaken about actual length of fireworks, citizens decry waste of tax-money on hour-long show in year-end celebration at Marina Bay

The Urban Redevelopment Agency (URA) announced in a press release on Wednesday…

How can we trust the Government?

the following is Singapore Democratic Party's response to Budget 2012: Budget At…

Suicide rates among the elderly have increased – why?

In 2017, there were 361 recorded cases of suicides in Singapore according…