Hi everyone,

This year marks the fifth anniversary of The Online Citizen (TOC).

TOC has managed to grow despite all the challenges that faced us over the years. Just this year, we were gazetted as a political association, faced both manpower and server issues while covering the recent General Elections, and had a Chief Editor leave at short notice. But we faced up to, and overcame, each and every one of those challenges head-on.

For that, we have to thank everyone who has helped to make TOC and our GE coverage a success: our former Chief Editor Andrew Loh, our contributors, our volunteers, our supporters and well-wishers, and you, our readers. And of course, our donors, whose immense generosity has helped to keep the website going.

Since the GE, and after spending time stabilizing the team after Andrew’s departure, we have been thinking hard about the future plans of TOC. We also recognize that there have been valid calls made, for TOC to be more transparent and accountable to our donors on how funds are being used.

We therefore intend to publish an annual report in early 2012, which will review our work in 2011 and also include a statement of our accounts for 2011.

A significant part of our projected expenses will go towards staff costs. To accomplish all that we want to, we will need full-time staff. We have had to make do with volunteers and a part-time intern (to whom we paid an allowance) in the past; we do not think that this is viable in the long term.

We had therefore engaged Kirsten Han as Deputy Chief Editor on a part-time basis, paying her an amount of S$500 per month. We have also engaged Jewel Philemon as a full-time editorial assistant up to mid-October, paying her an amount of S$800 per month. Our current Interim Chief Editor Ravi Philemon will continue to serve on an unpaid, voluntary basis.

(Disclosures: Kirsten is now part of the TOC core team, but the decision to engage and pay Kirsten on a part-time basis was made by the TOC core team before she joined us as Deputy Chief Editor. In addition, Jewel is Ravi’s daughter, and the decision to engage and pay Jewel on a full-time basis was made by the TOC core team as a whole excluding Ravi.)

Kirsten and Jewel both do a multitude of things for TOC behind the scenes, such as copy-editing, moderating comments, and uploading articles. In many ways, TOC can continue running without many of us, but it will almost certainly grind to a halt without Kirsten and Jewel. We therefore think that it would only be fair for them to get some compensation for all the time that they spend working on TOC.

We believe that these decisions are necessary for TOC’s stability and long-term viability. In the past, TOC has constantly struggled for survival. We want to move beyond that. We see remuneration for people spending substantial time on TOC as a necessary step, in placing TOC on a firm footing for its sustainable future growth.

But of course, we will always need our contributors and volunteers to continue with their valuable inputs. Because without you, our contributors, volunteers, readers and donors, without all the brave and committed Singaporeans who have helped make TOC what it is and who inspire us every day, TOC is nothing.

Please stay tuned for more news about our upcoming plans. In the meantime, thank you again for all your support and encouragement.

Yours faithfully,

Choo Zheng Xi
Joshua Chiang
Kirsten Han
Leong Sze Hian
Ravi Philemon
Siew Kum Hong

You May Also Like

英女皇御用大状:三司对林学芬停牌裁决 存“司法错误”

去年11月20日,三司特别庭(Court of Three Judges)作出裁决,总理李显龙弟媳林学芬的律师执照,被停牌长达15个月。 尽管三司认为,在处理家公李光耀遗嘱上,林学芬未出现不诚实行为,但在此事的责任仍属“中等偏高”,原因包括未有提醒李光耀,自身无权代表执行修改遗嘱,以及在李光耀执行最终遗嘱前亲自核实他的指示,有违作为律师的行为。 林学芬不同意上述裁决,也强调李光耀很清楚自己要什么,这是私人遗嘱,再者三司特别庭也未能证实李光耀在此事有出现精神不健全、或是被操纵的问题。 英女皇御用大律师,也是前伦敦律师公会主席的莫西·达顿(Timothy Dutton CBE),则认为司的裁决有“严重的法律错误”,判决依据在法律上也不正确。 据林学芬丈夫李显扬在脸书分享,达顿是在上月21日,针对林学芬的诉讼提供法律意见。在近29页的司法意见中,达顿指出三司对于林学芬以及家公李光耀身份关系的一些结论发现,似乎“站不住脚”(“untenable finding” );新加坡律师公会对林学芬的投诉,也可能存在“潜在严重问题(were…

工人党费沙质问 总统哈莉玛对储备金知多少?

工人党阿裕尼集选区议员莫哈末费沙质问,总统哈莉玛是否获得有关国家储备金的充足资讯? 在早前参与国会“坚毅向前”附加预算案致词,费沙就指出,要动用储备金,需得到总统的同意。政府需要向总统提供详细信息,总统则咨询总统顾问理事会成员,是否批准动用储备金的决策。 早前,对于新加坡的第四个抗疫预算案,哈莉玛总统原则上支持再度动用国家储备。 但费沙认为,总统对于国家储备金有多少余额,是否知情?这对于总统作出正确决策至关重要。 王瑞杰:总统对储备金完全知情 对此,副总理王瑞杰则强调,总统哈莉玛是在对储备金充分知情的情况下,同意动用储备金;也指宪法第22F也阐明,总统有权知道任何与储备金相关的资讯,以行使其在宪法下赋予的权力。 回溯过去,新加坡首任民选总统、开国以来第五任总统王鼎昌,就曾追问储备金事宜,对政府施压,要他们完成保护储备金的程序。 他曾指出,民选总统应该要保护国家储备,但其任期首五年,没人告诉他该保护的事物是什么。  

削首相权力 赋权国会遴选总稽查司

马来西亚反贪内阁特别委员会,于本月13日议决,将削弱首相权力,把遴选和委任稽查司和反贪污委员会的权限,交给国会遴选委员会。 首相敦马哈迪说,未来首相将不再干预总稽查司的遴选,政府和首相署也无权过问总稽查署事务,不论惩处、解雇、降职和该署财政预算,都是由国会遴选委员会定夺。 希盟政府为推动反贪改革,成立反贪内阁特委会。该委会是在13日举行第三次会议,并由首相敦马召开新闻发布会。 议员部长需呈报财产 敦马称,会议上也讨论加紧强化政府结构,削减官员贪污的几率。 针对申报财产进展,敦马指出当局将准备表格,让国会议员和部长直到如何呈报。 目前,该国总稽查署直接由首相署管辖。总稽查司人选是由首相建议给最高元首核准。削弱首相权力,包括限制首相任期至两届,也是希盟政府的竞选承诺。 不过,总稽查署任命涉及宪法规章,意味着希盟政府需在国会获得三分二议决,争取反对党议员的支持,才能通过修宪,将有关权限交给国会。 纳吉首相署形同“小内阁” 在前首相拿督斯里纳吉执政期间,权力集中于首相署,首相纳吉还兼任财政部长,同时首相署旗下政府部长过于庞大,拥有10名正部长和三名副部长,掌管事务几乎包山包海,例如:宗教事务、掌管首相署经济策划局、掌管司法事务、核能与小贩事务、中小企业与新村事务、国民团结事务和国会事务等等。 其中,掌管国会事务的首相署部长阿莎丽娜,也曾被前任下议院院长丹斯里班迪卡谴责越权;至于马国知名时事评论员黄进发博士也曾批评纳吉内阁“满朝皆部长”,透过委派官职分配权力蛋糕,来酬佣支持者,稳固派系势力。 同时,首相署旗下掌管太多机构,与其他部门权限重叠,例如交通部却无法管制火车、巴士乃至德士,因为主管单位乃是首相署旗下的陆路交通委员会(SPAD)。…

“Does a caregiver have to deplete everything before getting help?”

This letter appears in The New Paper today, Wednesday 8th December 2010,…