~by: Ravi Philemon~
~pictures: Shawn Danker~

‘Change’ was the theme of the 2011 Presidential Election. All four candidates tried to articulate and win over the electorate with their version of change.

For Presidential candidate Mr Tan Kin Lian, it was change through demystifying the office of the President. He wanted to do this by producing an annual report to account for the reserves under the custody of the President.

For Mr Tan Jee Say it was the substance of change.  He wanted the President to be unaffiliated to the ruling party so that the primary role of the President which (according to him) was to check and balance the government would besides being independent, would also be perceived as non-symbiotic.

For Dr Tan Cheng Bock, change was about symbolism. He advocated for a clear separation of the offices of the President and Prime Minister.  He wanted the Prime Minister’s Office to shift from the Istana and be situated elsewhere.

Even for President-elect Dr Tony Tan, it was change by the acceptance of the ‘new normal’. A ‘new normal’ which will see a stronger opposition in Parliament to compliment the ruling party to formulate better policies to enable a better Singapore.

In the end it was about who communicated their idea of change the best; it was also about whose idea of change the majority accepted (even if it was razor-thin) as something they can live with.

And speaking about communication of ideas, I think the new media was more instrumental in deciding the winners in the Presidential Election, than it was in the last General Election.

Let me explain.

In my opinion, it was Dr Tony Tan and Mr Tan Jee Say who went across various platforms to not only communicate their ideas, but also to give alternate media almost unhindered access to cover their campaign.

This was the reason why Mr Tan Jee Say was able to garner more than 25 per cent of the votes, and Dr Tony Tan was able to convince those that were ‘sitting on the fence’ that he may be worth considering.

And when I say the new media was more instrumental in deciding the winners of this election, I do not mean those that tried to reach out from their own new media platforms, (for going by that, Dr Tan Cheng Bock and Mr Tan Kin Lian were perhaps more tech-savvy than the other two) but those who besides engaging from platforms of their own, also engaged from those of others.

For example the team that was covering the Presidential election from TOC, needn’t guess on the schedule of Tan Jee Say during the campaign. His media team was very proactive in providing the full run-down of his schedule and gave unhindered access to our team.

As for Tony Tan, he kept engaging TOC despite the critical pieces our writers were writing about his campaign.  He had absolutely no reason to do so.

Contrast this with one candidate’s “you are the one who wrote nasty articles about me right?” confrontation; and “Because I’ve never heard of you guys from the online media and my friends haven’t either, so it’s hard for us to take you seriously. The important media is the print media”, dismissal by another.

In a four-cornered, tightly fought election, proactive engagement with a platform like TOC could have given Tony Tan and Tan Jee Say that little bit of edge.

TOC congratulates Dr Tony Tan Keng Yam on being elected.

Going forward, it will be very difficult for the new President to not keep engaging the people of Singapore, using  different and varied platforms.

In fact, this was the question TOC asked President -elect Dr Tony Tan at his media conference after his electoral victory, “How does he intend to remain accessible to the people of Singapore?”

To which Dr Tan replied that there are “many noises” before correcting himself, “voices – sorry” in Singapore today, and that he intends to reach them through small group gatherings and community events.

At the media conference, I had a relook at the handout which was given out (it was a copy of Dr Tony Tan’s statement at the media conference), and I was drawn to the words, “[Big SMILE]” on the handout; which was a personal reminder for him to smile at a certain juncture of making his statement.

I think this will be descriptive of the tenure of the new President. He will have to have a personal reminder to engage and remain accessible to the people who elected him, ever so often.


Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

728集会已捕获49人 港警斥示威者”愈演愈烈“

香港近日来每周都有反送中行动,昨日(28日)港民发起由中环遮打花园游行至中山纪念公园,追究警方7月 21日清场行动的不满,惟警方只批准在遮打花园进行集会。 综合港媒报道,当日数以万计参与集会人士占据德辅道中,经过金钟一直走向铜锣湾方向,沿途示威者以“黑警! 可耻! ”、“时代革命,光复香港”等口号表示抗议。 约下午5点时,示威者更兵分多路,除了部分示威者留守遮打花园,示威者纷纷向西环、铜锣湾、湾仔前进。部分示威者经过湾仔警总时不对叫骂,但暂时未有包围行动。 但截至晚间7时,示威者聚集于西区警署,警方开始清场,部分激进示威者更向警方投掷砖头等杂物,警方以适当武力制止及驱散,并使用催泪烟,避免与示威者正面冲突。 行动期间,有激进示威者在多处地方纵火,警民冲突再次升级。 警方批示威者行为愈演愈烈,表示已49人被捕 警察公共关系科高级警司余铠均,于凌晨(29日)召开记者会指事件至今共49人被捕,并予以最严厉谴责,批评他们行为愈演愈烈,激进示威者以“ 致命武器”袭击警员及四围纵火,亦有示威者以桠杈向警员射钢珠、投掷漆弹、怀疑腐蚀性液体及路牌等。 同时也批评示威者尽管仅获得遮打花园的示威批准,却仍不遵守指示,纷纷向东、西散去,造成交通阻塞,严重妨碍路况。…

综合慢性病患者 可享较高保健储蓄使用顶限

卫生部高级政务部长唐振辉宣布,2021年起患有多种慢性疾病患者,在保健储蓄700(MediSave700)计划下,能动用更多保健储蓄金额支付医药费。 此前我国政府在2018年,把保健储蓄顶限从400提升至500元。 在保健700下,符合资格患者可享有高达700元保健储蓄的使用顶限,包括现有进行的治疗、防疫和检测都可使用。 若一年内,病患需为两种慢性疾病就医,或患有一种慢性疾病,但还有其他并发症,都符合资格。 唐振辉今日是在国会拨款委员会辩论卫生部开支预算时这么表示,他预计有17万6000名患者将从中受惠。 此外,卫生部兼内政部政务次长安宁阿敏,也指出国人到综合诊所,以及社保援助计划(CHAS)下的家庭诊所,注射特定疫苗都能获得津贴。 此举是为了扩大成人免疫计划和全国儿童免疫计划。 对于18岁以下新加坡公民,全国儿童免疫计划(NCIS)下的疫苗和检测,在上述诊所接受服务都能获得全津贴。 至于成人方面,中低收入者到上述诊所,接受成人免疫计划下七种疫苗注射,则可获得75巴仙津贴;其他阶层成人则获一般津贴。 建国一代和立国一代能分别享有额外25至50巴仙津贴。这七种疫苗可为人体预防11种疾病。 卫生部将为这些私人诊所疫苗制定收费顶限,确保不会有诊所牟利。 国人也能动用保健储蓄户头,支付疫苗。

Brunei to start punishing adultery and gay sex with death by stoning

Starting next week, adultery and gay sex in Brunei will be punishable…

Iswaran assures Indian Minister that SG will stay open to talent and commit to relationship with India

At a high-level India-Singapore CEOs’ Forum attended by Indian Minister Shri Piyush…