by: HYY/


I awoke excited by the prospect of voting for the very first time! In previous years, my constituency had always been a walkover. I was travelling over GE 2011 and missed my opportunity to vote then. I had embarked on a last minute scramble to register as an overseas voter so as to vote in Australia, where I was at that time. But I was too late and had to console myself by watching Channel NewsAsia’s live coverage on the internet.

I cheered at the Workers’ Party victory, sighed over Chiam See Tong’s defeat, gripped the edge of my chair in anticipation at the Potong Pasir vote recounts and clapped for Yam Ah Mee as he announced each result with a poker face. I was part of that moment in solidarity with all other Singaporeans despite being a million miles away from home.

Now, I get to vote for the President at the Singapore Embassy in London. I learnt my lesson post GE 2011 and registered as an overseas voter way ahead of time. As I rushed to 9 Wilton Crescent, my heart thudded in excitement.

Somehow the sedate embassy with its organised and efficient staff did not match the state of my wildly agitated sense of anticipation. I did not know what to expect since I have hitherto not voted before. But everything was in line with what I had seenon TV previously.

However, there was a clear divide between my logical mind and my emotional self.

As I travelled to the embassy, I instinctively wanted to tell all the other passengers on the tube that I was on my way to vote for the very first time and that my country, Singapore, was moving towards being a real democracy at last!

Of course I resisted the urge. This was after all London where no one talked on the tube. Besides, they would think I was crazy! It was just an election – no big deal. In addition, it is not even a parliamentary election, just an election for the ceremonial office of the president.

But to me, it meant so much more than that. It was the first time I truly felt I had a stake in my country, however small that stake was. I had a vote and in that vote a voice. My single vote will not be election result changing. Indeed, it is but a pin in the ocean but within me, it brought about feelings of patriotism I had never thought I was capable of feeling!

I cannot speak for all Singaporeans of course but I think many will identify with me when I say that true democracy awakes genuine and heartfelt loyalty for Singapore.

More so than the ritual of singing the national anthem or reciting the pledge; more so than a national day parade that is a good show at best but reeks of propaganda; this vote (however small) gives me a say in the direction of my country. It gives a feeling that I am a part of Singapore – like nothing else can – for by casting that vote, I am asserting my right as a citizen thereby reiterating my status as a Singaporean.

This being the first time I voted, I put a lot of thought into who I should be voting for. I did endless research on the internet and watched interviews and rally speeches online. In so doing, I gained much insight into the role of the President.

To borrow a phrase from Tony Tan – we must vote for “an office that exists”.

Rightly or wrongly, the office of the President is largely an apolitical one. Although, he has some veto powers over issues such as national reserves and clemency, he does not have the far reaching abilities to initiate the changes that people hope he can.To vote for a candidate who promises to initiate changes that he legally would not be able to initiate, would be destabilising.

In reality, the President has to be able to work with the government for the betterment of Singapore. If we feel that the President should have additional powers, we should be relooking the Constitution. We should not be expecting the President (whoever he may be) to bring about changes that he realistically cannot bring. As it stands, he is just a little bit more than a ceremonial Head of State. And he can use his limited powers to represent the interests of all Singaporeans.

So who best fits that profile?

I will not reveal my vote but what I will say is this. In all honesty, I do not believe that any one of the candidates is perfect but I chose someone who I think will be the closest to what I think would befit what the office of the President should represent.

I voted for someone who I believe will be a dignified President. A President who will win the hearts and minds of the people and act as a unifying force between pro-PAP supporters and anti-PAP supporters. A President who has proven that he can challenge the establishment when needed but at the same time, an individual who is not needlessly confrontational.

A President who is above party politics and above all, a President with a heart to serve.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

国际特赦组织促政府撤回《防假消息法》

在我国国会在本周三(5月8日)通过《防假消息法》后,国际特赦组织(AI)随即在隔日发表声明,促请政府必须停止颁布法案,避免大大地缩减人民的言论自由。 该组织声明,由4月1日起提呈国会的《防假消息法》,以对抗“散播网路假消息者”,保障社会公众利益,已是默允政府持有不受约束的权力,钳制任何发布不利于政府的网络观点。 国际特赦组织东亚区主任轲霖(Nicholas Bequelin )斥责,新加坡曾有和平的批判声音当作刑事犯的不良记录。他认为,新加坡人民对于“制定法案旨在遏止网络言论”一事深感恐惧,因为这等于赋予政府权力审查批判性的政治言论。 轲霖说“这等于给予政府不受约束的权利,来审查充满批评与抗议的言论。法案并没有明确指出”真伪消息“的定义,甚至是”误导“的判断。 该法案于周三晚上10点,获得72票赞成、九票反对以及三票弃权,三读通过。对于提供假消息者,将依法裁定,可能获判最高10年监禁及罚款。 轲霖:政府能借机介入人民言论自由或管制传媒 该法案赋权部长,可要求社交媒体公司如脸书或推特移除可能含有“假消息”的内容。 轲霖认为,该法案赋予政府过多的权力,评断“假消息”的内容,并要求公司将其内容撤下。 他还说“这是一项人民需要警惕的现象,虽然科技公司有责任确保提供民众一个安全的数码空间,但并不表示政府能借机介入人民的言论自由或管制新闻媒体。” 他质疑,法案也是政府打击批政治批判言论的长期计划之一,透过对媒体设限,以及以刑事罪起诉维权人士,来抑制批判性言论。 国际特赦组织也举例,在去年举办的蓄意散播假消息国会特选委员会听证会,干扰人权维护者韩慧慧的自由言论,并罢免她出席听证会。…

Kenneth Jeyaretnam co-opted into Reform Party CEC

He hopes to carry on late father and party founder’s legacy.

“We must stop this brutality,” says Human Rights Lawyer

by Deborah Choo Human rights lawyer Mr M. Ravi will apply to…