by: Ravi Philemon/
picture: Shawn Danker/

There are many reasons out there in the online world detailing why one should not vote for Dr Tony Tan. I am writing this note to say why he may not be half as bad as most of the online world makes him out to be.

When Dr Tony Tan came out and said that he will be contesting in the Presidential Election of 2011 with his speech “How could I remain a spectator?”,  I was (I suspect like most in the socio-political blogosphere) extremely skeptical.

After the lunch with Dr Tan (with some other bloggers), I was still unconvinced about him. I wondered if he was engaging without wanting to be engaged.

But the more I thought through what Dr Tan said throughout his campaign period; the more I hear the various (often opposing) views, the more it dawned on me that it is not so easy to ignore him.

Yeah in the ‘Face to Face 2’ Presidential forum, Dr Tony Tan seemed to imply that the detainees of the 1987 ‘Marxist Conspiracy’ were terrorists.

But if you really heard the question MARUAH’s Clara Feng asked (HERE), it was a two-pronged question. She started off by asking about the ISA and then she veered from that question to inject the ‘Marxist Conspiracy’ into it.

Dr Tan may have of course heard the first part of her question, where she started off by saying, “My question is on the Internal Security Act (ISA) and it is directed to all the candidates”, and so his defence too could have been of that particular Act and not of the detention of the ‘Marxist Conspirators’.

Donaldson Tan argues quite cleverly (HERE) how the ISA itself has gone through several revisions since 1987, and even if it can still be reformed further, it remains an effective tool for countering terrorism.

Dr Tan could of course have defended the ISA as it is today, and not the ISA of 1987.

This interpretation seem to make more sense when you consider that later in the same Forum in answering another question:

“On the 25th anniversary of the of the Marxist arrest in May next year, will you if elected as President, take any steps to influence or lobby the government to review what happened in 1987 with a view to clearing the names of those that are alleged to be part of the conspiracy?”

from Senior Counsel Harpreet Singh, Dr Tony Tan answered:

“Next May – it depends on what new information or evidence is made available at that time and I will consider it in the circumstances of the case at that time.”

which seems to suggest that he will not be closed-minded about the innocence of the supposed ‘conspirators’ and will be open to reconsidering it if he is elected President.

He of course went on to say that he will not be able to comment on Cabinet discussions as they are covered under the Official Secrets Act and some have criticised that he had discussed that he repealed the Graduate Mothers’ Scheme as Education Minister.

What we have to remember is that he did not disclose Cabinet discussions, even in the Graduate Mothers’ Scheme, but information which was available publicly.

I, in fact, have the highest regard for people who stand by those with whom they have cast their lot with.  It takes a man to stand by a collective decision (whether it is good or bad) made, take ownership of it, and face the music for it.

My respect for Tony Tan would have been greatly diminished  if he, in considering the ‘new normal’, had chosen to distance himself from his past.

My participation in MARUAH’s ‘What do you do Mr President’, further reinforced my belief that Dr Tony Tan cannot be written off.  For as constitutional law expert, Dr Kevin Tan so rightly reminded, Mr Ong Teng Cheong (whom Mr Tan Jee Say says is his role model), was also a Deputy Prime Minister (like Tony Tan), before being elected President of Singapore.

The machinery of the People’s Action Party probably went on to endorse him and secure his victory, but once he was elected, his allegiance was no longer to the PAP; but he had a mind-shift – he was now aligned with the people of Singapore.

I had initially wanted to rebut The Straits Times’ Zakir Hussain’s assertion that “independence is ultimately a matter of the mind, not of past institutional links”, but now I somewhat agree with it.

Who is to say that Dr Tony Tan if he is elected, will not have a mind-shift of allegiance, from the PAP to the people of Singapore?

Yeah, of course most of the people who spoke at his rally where from the establishment.  But did he have a choice? Would someone from the alternative stick out their necks for him and ‘lose their reputation” of being the opposition?

The only person who was willing to be that brave is the Singapore People’s Party member and former-Acting Town Councillor of Potong Pasir, Mr Gunalan. He told me when I met him at Tony Tan’s lunchtime rally, “I’m voting for Tony Tan”.

I also agree with Terence Lee, editor of New Nation’s comment on Facebook, “IMO, Tony Tan has the most well-run campaign so far”, and because he has run the best campaign of the four, he cannot be overlooked.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Singapore ranked as most powerful passport in the world, alongside Japan and South Korea

The Henley Passport Index*, is an annual ranking of the most powerful…

另一“女佣洗冤录”? 被指盗雇主存款菲佣成功脱罪

高庭对前女佣巴蒂案在今年9月的判决,无疑在本埠抛下震撼弹,巴蒂原本被判监禁26个月,但高庭推翻国家法院判决,法官陈成安也形容樟宜机场集团前主席廖文良一家可能存在“不当意图”,女佣巴蒂有充分理由投诉人力部,而廖家“先下手为强”将他开除。 不过,10月30日,高庭亦推翻另一和女佣有关的判决。一名菲律宾籍女佣,原本被指控盗取老顾祝银行存款8千元,被判坐牢一年。不过经上诉得直无罪释放。 名为波蒂拉(Portela Vilma Jimenez)的50岁菲佣,原本负责照顾89岁的老雇主夫妇,雇主妻子不良于行。 但是,老雇主指控波蒂拉在2017年1月和2月期间,八次盗提老雇主银行存款,面对多达10项偷窃控状。波蒂拉不认罪,也指责老雇主四度非礼她,还要和她发生性关系。 波蒂拉也指老雇主趁老妇熟睡时闯入她房间,老雇主提议500元任摸,前者为了钱而答应。国家法院法官早前下判时,认为老雇主非礼波蒂拉一两次,但没必要一再不偿,并指责女佣口供前后不一,判她坐牢一年。 不满刑罚的女佣则透过来自尤金(Eugene Thuraisingam)律师楼的两名大状黄舒旺和夏珊娜,再次上诉,并提出如下疑点: 老雇主声称2017年2月初发现有未经授权提款,但审讯时却揭露当时根本没人从他户口提款 老雇主发现后,却拖了三个星期才报案 老雇主声称钱包一直在身上,那么波蒂拉如何拿到提款卡?…

Error in Tamil translation printed for fare guide by LTA and PTC

Public Transport Council has confirmed on its Facebook page on Friday (15…

【选举】乔立盟准备就绪 “选民的声音不应被当权者淹没”

人民党主席乔立盟(Jose Raymond)表示自己已准备好面对此次大选。 乔立盟也表示,自己与团队持续在波东巴西(Potong Pasir)深耕三年,因此带着无比期待的心情,在波东巴西竞选。 “就我们在波东巴西的服务而言,服务工作始于三年前,我们带着无比期待的心,在这与我们心连心的地方竞选。” 总统哈莉玛在上周二(23日)也正式宣布解散国会,并订下月10日将进行投票。而乔立盟紧随其后,连续发文表示对选举摒息期待,会在此次的竞选之战全力以赴。 他也指出此次选举的重要性,可以摆脱陈腐政策和思想的时候,呼吁人民思考未来的生活方式,并确保自己的声音能够被听见,不被权力所淹没。 “选举是为了确保你的声音能够被听到,并永远不会被掌权者的权力而淹没”。他也指,“选举就是关乎你的生活大事,你想生活在什么样的环境,想要在什么样的社会长大,想要为下一代留下什么样的新加坡。” 人民党日前宣布将由乔立盟出战波东巴西与碧山-大巴窑集选区的准候选人。另外,该党秘书长谢镜丰领导的四人团队,将出征碧山-大巴窑集选区。其他三名成员包括邱永豪、欧斯曼(Osman Sulaiman)和41岁的副主席Williamson Lee。