by: Siew Kum Hong/

It is as if the PAP is determined to prove that leopards cannot change their spots. The People’s Association can try its best to spin the truth, but the latest revelation from the Workers’ Party completely destroys any plausible deniability that could possibly be left.

The Workers’ Party’s revelation has to be read to be believed, but in a nutshell, the HDB had the brazen nerve to lease some prime spots for grassroots events — apparently previously by the PAP-controlled Aljunied Town Council — to the People’s Association. This was done quickly after the General Elections, on 27 May and 13 June, and apparently without any announcement or publication anywhere. On 15 August, the PA informed Sylvia Lim, Chairman of Aljunied-Hougang Town Council, that “bookings by WP will not be allowed”.

This is offensive on so many levels. The HDB needs to explain why it did what it did, and the timing for those actions. Why did it suddenly lease those areas to the PA, after the PAP lost Aljunied GRC, when those areas had previously been managed by the town council? Has it ever leased such areas to the PA in other constituencies ? What was the criteria for choosing those areas?

As for the PA, this drives the final nail through its pretense of being a true grassroots organisation — as opposed to a state-funded para-political organisation used as a mobilisation vehicle by the ruling party. If it was truly non-political, it would not issue a blanket refusal to lease these areas to the Workers’ Party.

Many will consider me naive, but I had hopes after the General Elections that the PAP would truly learn its lessons, and become a fair and just party truly focused on doing the right thing for all Singaporeans — instead of working for the party’s own narrow interests. I now see that that was too much to hope for.

Before May 7, I had privately predicted that GE2016 would be Singapore’s equivalent of Malaysia’s GE2008, when the opposition tsunami rocked the long-time ruling coalition. I did not see that happening this year. After May 7, I thought that the PAP still had a chance of avoiding an opposition tsunami in the next elections.

Well, let’s just say that the PAP MPs and prospective candidates better have a Plan B in 2016, in case they lose. Many of them will likely need to use it.


This post first appeared on Siew Kum Hong’s blog.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Body of missing boatman in Marina Bay Boat Fire found

The boatman, who went missing on Tuesday evening after his bumboat caught…

港政府宣布正式撤回修订《逃犯条例》

香港在经历两个多月的示威后,终于有突破性的进展。特首林郑月娥于周三(4日)正式宣布撤回修例,在立法会复会后会按议事规则撤回条例草案。 林郑月娥下午4点在特首官邸礼宾府会见多名建制派人士,包括港区人大代表、政协及立法会议员,讨论反修例风波。6点左右,她透过录影向全港市民发表讲话。 她在录影中针对五大诉求一一作出回应。有关撤回条例,她指出早在6月中旬已表示暂缓条例草案并表明修例工作已停止;第二点,亦是港人目前最关注的一点,有关成立独立调查委员会一事,她认为港警执法行动应按既定机制,交由专责的独立监警会处理,不应另设独立调查委员会,详细审视6月9日起,一连串大型公众活动,包括721 元朗袭击事件。 再者,有关示威活动的定性,她强调已多次重申,法律程序不存在暴动定性,每宗案的刑事捡空决定都会按照证据,以及法律执行;有关示威被捕人士不捡空、不追究违法,她认为这些行为是身为法治社会无法接受的,这已有违法治精神。 最后有关双普选,她表示欲达目标,社会首先必须站在法理的基础上,以平和互信的氛围下进行务实的讨论。 提出四大行动望与社会共同前行 另外,她在录影中提出四项行动,希望作为社会向前行的起点。 第一,政府会正式撤回条例草案,完全释除市民的疑虑。保安局局长会在立法会复会后,按《议事规则》动议撤回条例草案。 第二,政府会全力支持独立监察警方处理投诉委员会(简称监警会)的工作,除了邀请海外专家,她已委任新成员加入监警会,包括曾任其竞选办资深顾问的前高官余黎青萍,以及资深大律师林定国。林郑月娥承诺,政府会认真跟进监察会日后提交的报告建议。 第三,本月开始,她和所有司局长会走入市区与市民对话,让社会各个阶层,不同政治立场、不同背景的人士,透过对话平台直接说不满,一起去探讨解决方法。 第四,林郑月娥表示会邀请社会领袖、专家和学者,就社会深层次问题进行独立研究和检讨,向政府提出建议。…