Photo: coingape.com

by: National Solidarity Party/

The National Solidarity Party (NSP) regrets the continued lack of transparency surrounding our sovereign wealth funds (SWFs). The NSP believes that sufficient public information in the internal workings of GIC and Temasek Holdings is undoubtedly in the interest of all Singaporeans, as is a demonstrably robust system of check and balances in the management of our SWFs.

Singapore’s reserves, as well as Singaporeans’ Central Provident Fund (CPF) contributions, are managed by GIC and Temasek Holdings. In GIC’s 2011 annual report, released last month, the fund claims a 7.2% annualized rate of return in USD terms from its investments over the past 20 years. Converted to SGD terms, the annualised rate of return is 5.1%. Temasek Holdings claims annualized returns of 15% over 20 years. In comparison, CPF only pays out 2.5%. It is also a disturbing state of affairs when Temasek Holdings, with about 400 employees, can report an $8 billion administrative expense without incurring significant public scrutiny. To put it in context, $8 billion is more than one-sixth of our national budget.

The NSP believes that, as a mature, intelligent and financially responsible society, our citizens have the unquestionable right to have the fullest picture of where their taxes and government mandated social contributions go into and what comes out of that. Therefore, we strongly encourage greater public awareness of relevant benchmarks such as Malaysia’s Employees Provident Fund, which guarantees a minimum return of 2.5% p.a. and actually delivered returns of 4% to 8.5% annually since 1960 , and Norway’s SWF which has managed to be highly successful while offering greater disclosure to its citizens.

The longstanding excuse from the privileged few responsible for maintaining the shroud of secrecy around our SWFs is that secrecy aids competitiveness. PAP leader and long-serving former GIC Chairman Lee Kuan Yew has argued that if GIC makes its moves clear, competitors can predict what it does next. We believe that this argument is specious. There is a world of difference between GIC being transparent to stakeholders (which Singapore taxpayers surely are) on one hand, and foolishly telegraphing its investment strategy to competitors. There are plenty of examples of successful public companies that manage to turn in consistently good returns for stakeholders while providing full disclosure to stakeholders. Where our SWFs are concerned, as we can see from the paltry interest rates offered by CPF, Singapore taxpayers neither enjoy full disclosure nor noticeably remarkable returns.

The NSP also calls for all MPs and their immediate relatives to be open about any compensation that they might be receiving from Temasek Holdings or GIC or other such organizations. The ongoing review on ministerial salaries is a correct, if belated, move in the right direction. But it is only a partial step. For example, existing and former MPs such as Lee Kuan Yew, Lee Hsien Loong and Tony Tan have served many years in a chairman or deputy chairman role with GIC or Temasek. Close relatives of these PAP dignitaries are also serving in high positions within the SWFs. Additionally, with so many PAP MPs also juggling multiple, sometimes dozens, of directorships and consultancies, it is clearly in the public interest to know who else is paying their MPs and for what purposes.

We strongly recommend that serving MPs offer a full and public disclosure on all remunerated positions, including directorships and retainers, taken out with the official MP position.

NSP firmly believes that better financial transparency in our SWFs and Parliament is the best way to serve all Singaporeans, and hope that the new elected President will champion the move as this relates also to the management of our reserves.

Hazel Poa
Secretary-General
National Solidarity Party

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

梁文辉:前进党将在曾竞逐选区展开会见人民活动

前进党助理秘书长、候任非选区议员梁文辉,在脸书透露该党即将在所竞逐选区,展开会见人民活动,详情将透过社交媒体进一步告知。 “选战尘埃落定后,是时候下手去做最重要的事物–服务人民。” 梁文辉在今年的大选,随同该党秘书长陈清木医生等人,竞逐西海岸集选区。尽管资源有限,惟该党仍探讨如何更好地组织、尽力协助选民。 他透露竞选期期间,不少选民向他们反映问题,该党也回应了这些民众。与此同时,前进党西海岸会每逢周一晚上8时,都会召开线上会见选民活动。 前进党在今年的选举,由该党秘书长陈清木医生领导,进攻西海岸集选区,该党得票6万6871张,惟以4674张票之差惜败,但仍是得票率最高的落选在野党竞选团队。 选举局昨日也正式委任,前进党副主席潘群勤、助理秘书长梁文辉,出任第14届国会非选区议员。

世卫组织将武汉冠状病毒列为全球大流行疾病

在疫情激增后,世界卫生组织将武汉冠状病毒(COVID-19)列为全球大流行疾病,呼吁所有人应该必须面对这场公共卫生危机,每个人都必须参与抗疫。 世卫总干事谭德塞(TedrosAdhanom Ghebreyesus)今日(12日)在日内瓦记者会上表示,经世卫组织评估了疾病传播严重程度,认为此次病毒可被视为大流行 ,而在全球确诊与死亡病例不断激增后,决定上调疾病级别。 目前,中国境外的病例增加了13倍,受灾国家数量增加了两倍,未来一段时间内,预期病例数、死亡人数和受感染国家的数量会进一步攀升。 他表示,世卫组织在疫情期间不断进行评估,而世卫对于病毒传播的速度与严重程度,还有一些国家与地区在防疫上的无所作为而感到担忧,但他并未指明哪些国家。 疾病流行和大流行的区别在于范围,前者疫情扩散范围较小,后者通常是指传染病在多个国家乃至全世界流行。 谭德塞表示将病毒称为大流行并不会改变世卫对病毒威胁的评估,但若滥用大流行一词可能会引起不必要的恐慌, 世卫日前一直拒绝宣布将其称为全球大流行,谭德塞曾于2月底表示,若草率使用全球大流行一次,只会带来严重的风险,并发出病毒无法得以控制的错误信息。 世卫也曾于1月底表示,病毒疫情构成“国际关注公共卫生紧急事件”,而今日进一步宣布成疾病大流行也可能对引发多国全部或局部的紧急应变措施 据统计,全球目前已有118个国家和地区出现确诊病例,累计病例超过12万1000起,死亡人数超过4000个。

【冠状病毒19】有确诊者到过六地点 包括芽笼士乃巴刹、两间昇菘超市

卫生部在今日文告公布,有冠病19 确诊患者到过六个地点,包括芽笼士乃巴刹。和两间昇菘超市。 6月4日早上7时30分至8时,曾有病例到过芽笼士乃巴刹;同日早上8时至8时30分,有病例到过实龙岗路上段的博雅中心(The Poiz Centre)。 6月4日早上8时20分至9时:惹兰勿刹的New World Centre内的昇菘超市 6月8日晚6时55分至7时25分:芽龙路301号的昇菘超市 6月8日下午1时30分至2时05分:马西岭巷18号 6月10日早上11时至11时30分:文礼购物中心 当局呼吁若有民众在上述时间出现在改地点,宜留意自己的健康情况。…

匪徒目标转向新马二道 两小时九人遭掠夺

往返新加坡和新山的电单车骑士,成为掠夺目标,一名骑着大型摩哆车的匪徒在两个小时内抢夺了九人财物。许多受害者在被掠夺或追逐掠夺匪时,电单车失控而受伤。 根据马来西亚柔佛警察总部官方脸书贴文指出,有关的9起攫夺案是在2月25日5时50分至7时15分,在新马第二通道发生。 9名受害者皆是马国公民,年龄介于24岁至36岁,当时有者准备到新加坡上班,有的则是从新加坡返回马国的电单车骑士。攫夺案导致他们各别蒙受1000令吉至2500令吉的财务损失,其中包括大马卡、提款卡、信用卡、现金、工作证件、钥匙和手机等。 其中一名工厂操作员工虽然成功闪避掠夺匪,让对方无法抢走肩上的背包,但是也导致自个的电单车失控,进而跌伤。另有一名受害者因为被掠夺背包受了轻伤,尝试追逐掠夺匪,但是对方已经逃之夭夭。 逮捕一技工嫌犯 依斯干达公主城警区主任祖凯里受访时指出,掠夺匪干案手法如出一撤,受害者在骑着电单车时,被一名骑着红色大型摩哆的掠夺匪趋近强拉背包,或抢走在电单车篮子的包包。 他说,根据受害者描述,掠夺匪身材粗壮和带着眼镜,而且受害者没有看清楚掠夺匪摩哆的车牌号码。 祖凯里表示,警方在2月26日晚上已经逮捕了一名33岁的嫌疑犯。 警方表示,有关的嫌疑犯是在26日半夜12时25分,在古来沙令潘卡西拉花园,瑟鲁乃3路一间店屋内被逮捕。他说,嫌犯是一名技工,将被警方延扣5天至一星期。 警方将援引刑事法典第392条文(抢劫)、第395条文(结伙抢劫)以及第394条文(抢劫伤人)展开调查。