by: Jewel Philemon/

On 17 Aug 2011 at about 9.30am, one of our photographers noticed an accident along Marine Parade Road and started taking pictures of this incident involving two SBS Transit buses (one double-decker and the other a normal one).

A staff of SBS Transit who was with the vehicles that met with the accident, then stopped our photographer from taking any pictures of the accident. And not only that, he insisted that our photographer had committed an offence and compelled him to go to the nearest police station.

A police officer at the police station said that there was no case, but the staff of SBS Transit claimed that he was representing Public Transport Council (PTC) and that our photographer should be detained as he was in breach of an unspecified law pertaining to PTC.

Upon this insistence by the staff of SBS Transit, the police officer took down the name, NRIC and contact details of our contributor, without filing a case.

TOC wrote to the PTC to seek clarification on this and asked if there is any such law prohibiting a member of public from taking pictures of motor vehicle accidents on our public roads; and if the of staff SBS Transit can indeed represent himself as a representative of PTC?

We copied the Singapore Police Force in the same correspondence and asked if a case has been filed against our photographer, and if so what was the offence; and also SBS Transit asking if its staff had acted in an unbecoming manner, how do they intend to resolve the matter?

TOC received a reply on 19 August from SBS Transit saying:

We are horrified to learn that this had happened. This is certainly not something we condone. Our staff did not comply with company guidelines when he stopped Mr XXX from taking photographs and insisted that he accompany him to the Police station. There was also no need for him to identify himself as a Public Transport Official given that there was no fare enforcement action taking place. For these lapses, we are taking disciplinary action against him.

We would like to extend our deepest apologies to Mr XXX for the inconvenience and distress caused.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Taiwan’s legislative body passes resolution in support of Hong Kongers’ opposition to extradition Bill

The Legislative Yuan, Taiwan’s lawmaking body, has passed a resolution urging the…

即时:罗斯玛正式被捕

马来西亚反贪污委员会证实逮捕前首相夫人罗斯玛。她在今早到反贪会录供,料在明日会被控上庭。 反贪会发言人和罗斯玛律师吉旦,都证实她被捕的消息。预料她将在反洗黑钱法令(AMLA)下,被打倒吉隆坡地庭被提控。 今日是罗斯玛第三度到反贪会总部录供。早前,她分别在6月5日和9月26日前往录口供。 有消息指,罗斯玛可能面对超过20项刑事控状。反贪会怀疑她涉及洗黑钱、挪用SRC国际公司资金,来购买100万令吉的抗老美容品。 全国副警察总长丹斯里诺拉西也表示,将在近期传召罗斯玛,针对一马公司案调查,同时希望罗斯玛协助指认,从纳吉位于柏威年公寓住处搜出的金饰品。 警方在5月16日,从纳吉6个住处供搜出超过10亿令吉的各类财物。另有黎巴嫩著名珠宝商世皇贸易SAL公司(Global Royalty Trading SAL),起诉罗斯玛,指后者向该公司借了44件珠宝试戴,仍未付款。

志工拿新床铺助知足老奶奶 网民纷纷按赞

本地义工组织“让希望活下去”分享,他们在进行家访时,协助一位知足老奶奶的经历。让网民们备受感动,纷纷表示乐意提供协助。 网友Lee Siew Yian于本月10日上载有关帖文,分享了他们在两天前(8日)傍晚,假明地迷亚路(BENDEMEER ROAD)附近组屋进行家访行动时,震惊于这一对老夫妇所面对的困境,并感动于老奶奶的知足行为。 老夫妇家徒四壁 她指出,当天她和友人到老夫妇家进行访问时,惊见家中地板空空的,没有床铺等,不禁问老奶奶晚上如何过夜的事情。 “我在很‘薄’的床铺上过夜,我的先生在椅子上睡觉。” 老奶奶的回答令网友感到心疼,就表示该组织有送出新的床铺,而且是单人尺寸的,就问老奶奶需要几个。 网友在发问后,还不禁自嘲明知故问,岂知老奶奶只表示“要一个”。 网友当下就无言了,只拿起笔和纸写下了“两个”。 Lee…

个人防护设备物资吃紧 马国医护人员用塑料袋作防护服

随着疫情在邻国马来西亚爆发,前线人员想当然也会马不停蹄进行抗疫工作,可是这也随着他们的防护物品供不应求,无法及时为他们提供防护物品,邻国马来西亚的医护工作人员只得以其他替代材料,用垃圾袋、保鲜膜、塑料袋等自制防护服。 《马来邮报》报导,医生与护士表示,由于医院内的防护设备已经缺货,他们别无他选,只能自己动手自制。 “每次我们在治疗病人前,甚至是进行检测时,我们都需要30分钟或更长的时间适应。在使用完毕后就要丢掉,所以一天下来必须换上四五套”,一名东马医院的医生表示。 他也指出,“最重要的是,它没有起到很好的保护作用,我们别无他选。” 截至目前,已有19名马国医护人员被确诊感染,其中11人更是在重症监护室中接受治疗。 而一般的个人防护设备(Personal Protective Equipment)也包括手术帽、面罩、手套、白袍、靴子、外科口罩等,这些暂时都正在缺货中。 由于个人防护设备逐渐缺货,而疫情却一直持续恶化,两名资深医生也写信公开呼吁当局应加快供应物资,而且他们质疑目前的供不应求是来自于囤货。 来自私立医院的儿科医生穆萨(Musa Mohd Nordin)和祖尔基夫里(Zulkifli…