by: Jen Tai/
Photos: Shawn Danker/

There are many things that are Uniquely Singapore, some of which are not positive. One of these things is taking part in highly unsatisfactory elections. For many Singaporeans, we didn’t get to vote for years/decades till May 2011 and even then it was most unsatisfactory as residents in Tanjong Pagar still didn’t get to vote due to a technical 3-second legality. And for many who did vote, they had to vote for GRC teams, some of which comprised members whom the voters did not like nor want to support.

This Presidential Election is turning out to be even more unsatisfactory and almost farcical. The time given for Singaporeans to really know the Presidential candidates is much too short (yet again) and this is doing a great disservice to the electorate. In this space of time, we have been left feeling confused and dissatisfied, which may have been the intent of the political strategists.

Given the situation and the slate of candidates, the elections is fast becoming a case of voting for who we object to least rather than who we really want for many Singaporeans.

Putting aside the camps that are devoted PAP/Tony Tan supporters, and the respective supporters of Tan Jee Say, Tan Cheng Bock and Tan Kin Lian, it seems clear that a significant number of voters still do not know who they want to vote for.

For this group of the “undecideds”, many are united on one thing – they do not want Tony Tan who is proving, with every electioneering comment that he makes, that he is totally pro-government, steeped in old-school PAP arrogance and is likely to protect and maintain the status quo if elected President.

Choosing one of the remaining three Tans is a dilemma as all three have clear flaws which have been pointed out in other commentaries and in online forums. But all three do show genuine sincerity and passion in wanting to make changes that are better for Singaporeans.

Meantime as one of the “undecideds” I only know what I don’t want in our President:

  1. Someone who does not have the stature of a President to represent Singapore.
  2. Someone who makes us feel queasy when we look upon Presidential wall photos.
  3. Someone who is inarticulate and speaks broken English.
  4. Someone who does not have the morals, conviction and compassion to do what is right for Singaporeans.
  5. Someone who is bent on protecting the ruling party’s power base.
  6. Someone who does not have the guts to speak up and the stamina to stay the course for Singaporeans.
  7. Someone who lacks the EQ to understand the people and how to work with the ruling party.
  8. Someone with a questionable history of cockiness and past behavior.

Going by some of the criteria eliminates one of the candidates for me – Tan Kin Lian. As for Tan Jee Say, he has the guts and has raised good issues, but he comes across as overly aggressive.

As for Tan Cheng Bock, he remains a mystery to me as to who he really is and I wonder how far he will go to do the right thing in protecting our country’s reserves and in speaking up for Singaporeans. But interestingly, he may turn out to be the “safe” vote for many people.

So what are we “undecideds” going to do come August 27? Many are waiting to see which of the non pro-establishment Tans is leading in the race by end of this week. The game plan, it seems, is to vote for the leading candidate to boost his chances of winning. How they will know which of these three Tans to bet on is going to be challenging.

What is clear though, is that this election is turning out to be one that is not by choice but by elimination for many voters. And that is totally unsatisfactory and unbecoming for a Presidential Election.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Police report filed against PAP’s Murali Pillai over “falsehoods” regarding “scurrilous attack” on his family

A police report was made against PAP candidate Murali Pillai on 8…

Ministerial Statements proved nothing more than smoke-screens to sell narrative that FTAs are important for S’pore’s survival

by Kok Ming Cheang Two Ministerial Statements that proved nothing more than…

文礼当铺劫案变装匪今面控

文礼当铺劫案嫌犯今早面控,名为谢赫莫哈末拉赞的孟加拉籍建筑工人,涉嫌在上周六(28日),企图打劫文礼地铁站外的方圆当(ValueMax),今日在法庭被控企图持械抢劫和展示仿制军火罪。 法庭资料显示,被告当时向当铺经理展示一把21公分菜刀,以及黑色疑似手枪的物件。警方则指出,嫌犯抢劫未遂,曾恫言要炸掉当铺。 29岁的嫌犯自去年12月起,就在本地逾期逗留。其实际犯罪动机仍在调查中。在7月28日当天下午4时许,嫌犯走进上述地点当铺,拿出刀和假手枪,威胁当铺职员交出财物。当时他头上包着粉红色头巾作掩饰。 职员拒绝就范,嫌犯便恫言要炸掉当铺,把一个疑似炸弹的物品丢在柜台,没有盗取任何财物就逃离现场。职员立即把物品丢出店外并报警。 嫌犯干案后逃离现场,立即变装,将原有干案器械、头巾和衣物,装进黑色背包丢在裕廊西一组屋单位的盆栽后面。该单位住户在案发三小时后发现背包并报警处理。 据警方调查,嫌犯干案用的仿制手枪不再背包里,目前仍在搜寻。假枪乃用塑料组装。至于疑似炸弹的物品,也只是些电子零件。 警方直至本月1日傍晚7电,在马士吉街苏丹回教堂捕获嫌犯。 警方在昨日押嫌犯前往案发现场取证,协助调查。 不过,在法庭上嫌犯却声称自己当天喝醉了,坚称没有出示刀子和手枪,只是向职员展示炸弹。法官下令继续还押嫌犯,直到本月10日再过堂。 企图持械抢劫,一旦罪成被告可被判坐牢两年至七年,以及至少12下鞭刑。展示仿制军火指控罪成,则可悲监禁十年,和至少三下鞭刑。

MOM clarifies Mustafa Centre’s cost-cutting measures are fairly implemented, but silent on the allegations of “cashback practices” made against the company

The Ministry of Manpower (MOM) on Wednesday (9 Sept) said that Mustafa…