The following is an excerpt of an article on Yawning Bread

Alex Au/

I was speaking at an event organised by Maruah about the upcoming presidential election. Law professor Kevin Tan was the first speaker, giving a detailed run-down of the relevant constitutional provisions. This helped to clarify something that few Singaporeans, in the past, had much reason to pay attention to — what exactly the constitution says about the powers of the president.

Partly because of unfamiliarity with the role of the head of state, since our presidents have generally been like puppets on a string, many Singaporeans initially approached this election as a replay of the general election, bringing up issues such as housing, transport, the income gap and the influx of foreigners. Law minister K Shanmugam, in the last month or so, had to sternly tell Singaporeans that the president had no power at all — he was mostly to be a figurehead — except in a few areas where the constitution said he could act in his own discretion. Shanmugam’s attempt to shut Singaporeans up didn’t work as well as he might have hoped; expressions of bread-and-butter frustrations continue.

The mainstream media, taking the cue from the government, has mostly framed their reporting in the same way, but instead of saying that Singaporeans didn’t understand what the presidency was about, put a twist on it:  saying that certain candidates didn’t understand. The slant was that these candidates were “over-promising” and that they will surely fail to deliver and disappoint their supporters. There is also an unspoken slur that these candidates are out to break the law, raising the bogeyman of “confrontational politics”. Sotto Voce: These are bad candidates and you shouldn’t vote for them.

A reporter called me Sunday and asked me questions along those lines again. The thrust of the questions was to try to get me to agree that certain candidates were over-promising, and that they were unrealistic — from which it would be a short hop to saying they were delusional or confrontational. I resisted, reiterating what I said at the Maruah forum.

To which we will now come back. . .

Read the full article here.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

应对疫情措施 本地佛教组织改脸书直播庆卫塞节

迎接卫塞节的到来,新加坡佛友会(Buddhist Fellowship)、新加坡佛教总会基于冠状病毒防疫措施、民众的健康安全着想,明天改为通过社交媒体脸书直播庆祝活动。 至于新加坡佛教总会会长广品法师,则向本地社区和客工佛教徒致以祝福。由于寺庙因新冠肺炎阻断措施而关闭,奉献者可在5月7日上午10点至下午4点,在脸书观赏新加坡佛教总会举办的活动。 佛友会也在媒体声明中指出,配合政府制定的阻断措施,今年的卫塞节庆祝活动将在网上进行,活动包括有通讯及新闻部长易华仁致辞、澳大利亚珀斯Bodhinyana修道院高僧Ajahn Brahmali主讲。有关直播活动是从早上9时开始至晚上8时15分。 卫塞节庆祝活动将在脸书专页直播。欲知详情可到佛友会官网(https://www.buddhistfellowship.org/bfwp425/events/vesak-2020-buddhism-in-a-new-decade/)查询。 新加坡佛教总会卫塞节脸书直播:https://www.facebook.com/SBFeVesak/

MinLaw: Facebook’s refusal to take down post shows why legislation is needed to protect Singapore from Deliberate Online Falsehood

Ministry of Law has shared that Facebook declined to take down the…

FOTF reveals fundamentalist agenda in latest anti-gay campaign

The following is an excerpt from Yawning Bread Just when the legislature…