by: Ajax Copperwater/

Ever heard of this joke?

Question: Why doesn’t Singapore has a cosmonaut yet?
Answer: Because the Singapore Government was afraid that the cosmonaut might migrate to Mars.

I chanced upon a news article, which featured President’s Scholar, Miss Xiao Yifei. Well, I say good for her for receiving a prestigious scholarship through diligence and immersing herself in charity works. A remarkable lady!

However, that’s not what caught my attention. The below-mention did:

“19-year-old Yifei came to Singapore from China when she was four years old.

Though she carries a dual citizenship, the former Raffles Institution student said she has always considered herself a Singaporean and will have no issues renouncing her Chinese citizenship when she reaches 21.”

Wait a minute… Since when does Singapore allow dual citizenship? A check with Wikipedia came out:

“Minors who are dual or multiple citizens by birth on foreign soil, by descent from foreign parents or by naturalisation before the age of 18 are required to renounce all foreign citizenships by the age of 22 or may lose their Singaporean citizenship.”

Hence, this explains Miss Xiao’s circumstance. It was only possible in her case, being born in China and naturalized before the age of 22, as it’s forbidden for anyone 22 (or above 21 for males obliged to serve National Service) to hold dual citizenships.

But, hang on… I have served alongside non-Singapore citizens during my NS stints. Good fellows every one of them. The ban on dual citizenship does not make any sense when National Service (NS) comes into play.

So, what’s in a citizenship which was so contentious during the last General Election?

A citizenship guarantees a citizen protection by the nation; and gives the citizen several rights and benefits from the nation. The citizen usually gets the lion’s share of the pie. Of course, these rights and benefits come with obligation to the nation as well.

Most Singaporeans think this is not the case in Singapore. Flip through any blog and you will find foreigners getting priorities or preference at jobs, education, NS deferment, etc. over Singaporeans.

Of course these are just hearsay and cannot be verified first-hand, but the over-crowding of our public infrastructure due to the influx of foreigners, gives some credence to this.

The real problem though is over-crowding – there are just simply too many people in this country.

Humans were never meant to live in high-density areas. We are hard-wired to be territorial. Living and working on top of each other, and having so many people around us 24/7 only increases the feeling of suffocation.

Then there is this migratory nature of humans, often seeking to better our living conditions. Sometimes, it’s just a seeking of change of environment or to experience a different culture.

But unlike other countries, Singapore is city-state. Which means that citizens can’t uproot from a city and move to another within the same country. The only solution available to us is to move to another country.

In this globalised world, it simply doesn’t make sense to ban dual citizenship. To use the excuse that national security might be compromised due to multiple allegiance, is also not justifiable because we have Permanent Residents who are citizens of another country serving NS.

I strongly support the notion of dual citizenship for Singaporeans regardless of age and gender. This will allow Singaporeans to become fully a citizen of the globalised world, as well as live in another country to broaden their own experience.

In addition, allowing dual citizenships will also enable Singapore to have a bigger population, without physically straining living conditions here, as Singaporeans will be free to live and work elsewhere, and also benefit from services provided by both countries.

Singapore is a knowledge-driven economy and we need the exchange of ideas and people in order to move forward. Dual citizenship will enhance this exchange greatly.

Dual citizenship does not mean Singaporeans will forget about Singapore or abandon it in times of crisis. It gives restless humans a sense of belonging and home in two places. Moreover, it gives people a sense of acceptance and a feeling of not being discriminated for having more than one heritage – for having families overseas.

Remember the joke earlier? Now, do you see a Singaporean-Martian cosmonaut among today’s children?

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

雇员控诉公司歧视聘雇 人力部澄清:“并非事实真相”

日前一名员工在网路上控诉公司以外国人才取代她,随后向人力部寻求协助无果的故事引起网民的关注,人力部于14日发表声明澄清并非“事件的真相”,同时她称劳资政公平与良好雇佣联盟(TAFEP)未跟进案件并未属实。 此事由维权人士吴家和于3月6日在脸书所转载,随后由本社英语站报导。该名化名“劳拉”的女士,声称其公司欲聘请来自香港的外国人才,以此取代她的职位。随后她找上人力部,但被转介到劳资政公平与良好雇佣联盟。 她表示,自己也听从人力部的指示,立即联系TAFEP。然而等到她寻求国务资政张志贤和人力部长杨莉明帮助、且威胁公开此事,TAFEP才给予她回应。 TAFEP联系劳拉并给予建议,即等到她收到遣散费后再来进行投诉,因为他们无法保证公司在调查期间是否会提供遣散费。当时劳拉已离开公司两个月。 劳拉声称,如果她不签署“公司免责”信函,人力部与TAFEP无法保证他的遣散费,而他的公司也表示若她不签,公司就不会支付遣散费。 她阐述,这就等同于“企业霸凌”(corporate bullying)。 与此同时,她认为人力部也在默许这种情况发生,她表示,“人力部对于裁员都了如指掌,因为公司裁员是需要向人力部报告,而且他们也批准了香港人才的EP,让她取代我的职位。” “人力部有怀疑过这个外国人才正是取代本地劳动力的可能吗? 仅仅因为它是“公司内部调动”,所以他们就不再质疑了吗?” 本社随后也联系了劳拉的雇主与TAFEP取得回应,当时没有任何一方的答复。 曾公开劳拉真名随后又撤回…

员工见义勇为之举触动人心 网友致函吁中央医院表扬

好的表现值得被赞赏,见义勇为、救人于危难困扰中时,更值得被表扬。一名网友因父亲的突发状况,导致家人被困在天桥上,而新加坡中央医院员工的所作所为却直接感动了他,甚至在脸书上联系相关医院。 网友Jonathan Meng Sum Lee于本月6日,在脸书上帖文,给新加坡中央医院写了一封感谢信,感谢并赞扬该医院的印裔员工依思瓦里(Isvali N Veloo)在遇见前者父亲有困难时,及时给予帮助。 网友在帖文中讲述了依思瓦里给予其父亲帮助的过程。 父亲忽双脚无力受困天桥 网友的父亲于上周末在牛车水的天桥上,忽感脚无力,无法行走。当时虽然有许多路人愿意提供帮助,但是他们都不知道该如何妥当移动一位失去脚力支撑的老人。 网友父亲困在该处约3小时,依思瓦里碰巧经过,马上意识到网友的父亲需要帮忙。 “我认为她凭着多年的专业经验和知识,让她能够快速评估情况并确定了一个合适的行动。”…

Flat ownership transfers only allowed in certain cases: HDB

The Housing and Development Board (HDB) has implemented new restrictions for the…