Joshua Chiang/Photos by Shawn Danker
The jeers that greeted Presidential candidate Dr Tony Tan as he took to the stage to give his speech on Nomination Day were loud enough that those who were watching the live broadcast on Channel Newsasia could here.

“I think it is deeply disappointing to have people who will not even listen. I hope that during this campaign, Singaporeans will listen to views of all the candidates,” Dr Tan told the press afterwards.

According to Today, it was the supporters of rival candidate Mr Tan Jee Say who jeered at Dr Tony Tan. The Online Citizen’s volunteer photographer Shawn Danker who was present at the Nomination Centre concurred.

He estimated that there were 50 Tan Jee Say supporters in the crowd of roughly 500. He also told TOC that he recognized some in the group as the same people who had jeered at Tin Pei Ling during Nomination Day of the General Elections at Tao Nan Primary School on 27th April this year. Back then, they had chanted “Kate Spade! Kate Spade” when the PAP team contesting Marine Parade GRC – of which Ms Tin was a part of – came out to greet their supporters after the Nomination Papers were submitted and approved. (watch the video here)

Mr Danker also said that the supporters of Dr Tan Cheng Bock and Mr Tan Kin Lian had remained largely out of the fray during Dr Tony Tan’s speech.

When interviewed by the press over the jeering incident, Mr Tan Jee Say said, “I thought that was not the correct way to conduct our campaign. We should show respect to everyone.”  He had earlier told the press on 11th August when collecting his Certificate of Eligibility that he “looks forward to a dignified contest”.

Opinions divided

Opinions were largely divided when TOC posted the question on its Facebook page what they think of the incident.

“Regardless of the other opponents fight fair or not, personally I felt jeering is unsporting and not a respectable way of expressing our feelings. People can say all they want to degrade us, but we should not degrade ourselves,” wrote Joseph Goh.

Echoing a similar sentiment, Weiwen Loh wrote, “Booing is childish behaviour. Just like name-calling, insults, and baseless accusations. Let’s not turn our elections into a circus.”

But there were also people who thought otherwise.

Johnny Loh wrote, “No big deal, PAP supporters boo to SDP on GE 2011 Nomination Day too.”

Ridzuan Osman agreed, “Booing doesnt mean youre not being civilised. Its part and parcel of a political campaign. All the candidates are grown up adults and they have been in the political scene for quite some time so if they are affected by boos and jeerings, I dont know what should be said of them.”

Juan Yan Lim felt that a candidate’s tolerance for ‘pressure’ is reflective of whether he can lead the country through its toughest times. “If a candidate says he can take pressure to lead the country, especially in this tough times, but keep whining about the boos, then it says very clearly his tolerance for pressure,” he wrote.

“I think it is the right thing to do as it can help to sway votes in the pro-singaporean direction. Some people do require verbal cues to know which candidate deserves our vote,” offered ‘Emeritus Niki Wang’.

On her blog Singapore Actually, ‘bookjunkie’ gave an explanation to the jeering:

“It shows how angry the people are. How much a huge segment of the population don’t trust that Tony Tan is impartial. I think most people link him to PAP, even his supporters. The mainstream media and his former party members sort of added to this by having the Unions and Clans back him up. And here I thought the President was supposed to be impartial.”

Regardless of opinions, one thing’s for sure. It doesn’t matter how loud are the ‘boos’. The only voice that truly counts at the end of the day is the voice of the vote.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

FAQ on Sexuality promotes "Be faithful" message, says Health Minister

By Andrew Loh The FAQ on sexuality published by the Health Promotion…

反对声浪下 马政府不签署《消除一切形式种族歧视公约》

相信是在部分穆斯林群体的反对声浪下,马来西亚政府决定不签署《消除一切形式种族歧视公约》(ICERD)。 马国首相办公室发文告证实此事,同时表明会“继续捍卫联邦宪法,即其中在建国由各族群一同订立的社会契约。” 马国政府原有意签署ICERD公约,但却遭来国内穆斯林社会、甚至部分政府代表表达反对立场,担忧签署了ICERD,联邦宪法中第153条文,有关马来人与土著的特权、伊斯兰的神圣性将受侵蚀。 为了反对政府签署上述公约,马国两大最大马来族群政党,巫统和伊斯兰党(PAS),恫言在下月举办反ICERD大集会。 伊党主席哈迪阿旺甚至形容,ICERD公约其实是“共济会的阴谋”,企图破坏马国宗教和种族和谐。 哈迪阿旺指出,美国是最鼓吹ICERD的观念,但该国已经忘记了屠杀及压迫红印地安土著的歷史。 他认为,既然马国联邦宪法已明文规定,不得歧视非穆斯林,所以马国并不需要ICERD。 包括马国,全球十四国家未签署ICERD ICERD是在反犹太主义事件和反对南非种族隔离制度情况下诞生。 联合国于1960年12月,通过谴责违反联合国宪章和世界人权宣言的种族、宗教及民族仇恨的行迳,随后在1963年11月20日的联合国大会接纳ICERD的草案。 ICERD的核心条款为第一条款,有关条款主要是种族歧视的定义为“基于种族、肤色、世系或民族或人种的任何区别、排斥、限制或优惠,其目的或效果为取消或损害政治、经济、社会、文化或公共生活任何在承认、享受或行使其他方面人权及基本自由的平等地位。 目前,全球有175国已签署上述联合国公约,马来西亚是世界上15个未签署ICERD的国家之一,与朝鲜、缅甸及汶莱齐名。…

SBS reports increase in profit in second quarter compared to last year

SBS Transit reported on Wednesday that their profits in the second quarter…