Excerpt of TOC’s exclusive interview with Mr Tan Kin Lian:


TOC: Well referring to an article that you wrote in 2004, you wrote about the casinos and you wrote that you “support the idea of a casino” and that “it does not matter that some Singaporeans will eventually gamble in these casino”. You also wrote that, “It is not the job of the government to stop Singaporeans from gambling in those casinos” Can you explain what you really meant?

TKL: I think I must explain more clearly because I think there is some misperception. Firstly what is gambling? Now my family goes to my mother who is 87 years old and she likes to play mahjong. And around the mah-jong table they do have some money passed. Is that gambling? I don’t think so. If you are going to play mah-jong if you are going to have some stake, it’s more fun. I don’t consider that gambling. Similarly there are many people who go to buy- line up to buy TOTO. It’s just a way to pass the week to look forward to something. So long as the amount of money that you spend is the same money that you would spend on entertainment. Some people spend 200-300 dollars to watch one show. Other people spend that money to buy 4D or TOTO. So gambling in small amounts of money is alright. Even if you have to go to the casino, because there are things in the casino – so long as you bet with money that you set aside for this.

Now when it becomes big scale, when you bet money you cannot afford to lose, of course then you must stop it. In fact, I also said that the biggest gamble is not the casino. I said it was the stock market and the currencies. Big sums of money. So therefore we must look up on the question of gambling in a more rational way. Of course there are some gambling that are bad, when people over gamble. When they gamble on owing money. So I also said that there should be, you should ban lending of money for gambling. That’s bad. Gambling on credit is wrong. So I think of course it seems that the casino has become a bit worse than I expected. That means more people gamble large sums that they should not. We must look at this problem. But I still come back on the original premise that so long as you gamble small sums, it’s a form of entertainment.

TOC: Surely, no doubt the casino has reaped economic benefits, but wouldn’t the government have foreseen the social problems that would have arisen from the casinos?

TKL: Ok now the first is the question to foresee, it is very hard to foresee. But it’s easier to act to find the problem. Which you don’t have to foresee because there are many unexpected things but when a problem arises you must act. And since now that I realize that more people are gambling, I must take action to address this issue.


Read the transcript of the exclusive interview HERE.

 

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

李玮玲公开2013年柯金梨和父亲往来电邮 内容讨论遗嘱事宜

已故建国总理李光耀的女儿李玮玲,今早在个人脸书公布一则誌期2013年12月12日的电邮。有关电邮是由李和李律师事务所的柯金梨致函给李光耀,内容提及平分遗产事宜。 李玮玲在贴文中指责,其兄长一再指责其兄嫂,即李显扬妻子林学芬有份参与并促使父亲李光耀签署2013年12月的遗嘱。 “柯金梨否认参与2013年遗嘱,这都是虚假的,柯金梨一直在撒谎,她也违背了对他客户即我父亲的职责。” 她重申李和李律师事务所一直都是父亲的私人事务律师,协助处理包括遗嘱、授权书和医疗照护事前指示(AMD)。 “事实是父亲在签署2013年12月遗嘱前,对于他想修改的事宜和柯金梨有深入讨论。从2013年11月底直到12月13日,父亲就他的遗嘱内容,以电邮往来和柯金梨讨论。” 她指出,和柯金梨在此前的讨论,都反映在父亲在2013年12月17日签署的遗嘱,正是父亲想要的,平分给所有子女,也是父亲和母亲及所有人一致同意的。 李玮玲也表示,此次公开的只是父亲与柯金梨其中一则讨论2013年12月遗嘱的电邮,“还有更多,”不过她未明言还有更多是否意味着仍会继续公开更多内容和档案。 李和李律师事务所的合伙人,也是柯玉芝侄女的柯金梨,曾在去年2017年向《海峡时报》表示,自己没有参与最终遗嘱的订立。 约两周前(4月15日)李玮玲就曾在个人脸书发文抨击,近期媒体报导不断重复哥哥李显龙总理,对李显扬的“不实且可耻的指控”(false and dishonourable allegations),指后者涉及诈欺父亲以在遗嘱中获得更多份额。…

PM Lee reminds party members to be close to all segments of society and that their duty is to serve the public

Secretary-General of People’s Action Party (PAP), Mr Lee Hsien Loong in his…

电视论坛与人民互动 网民对财长回答大不满

新加坡财政部长王瑞杰在星期一(2月18日)发布2019年预算案后,他于星期二(2月19日)出席了一个预算案电视论坛,让民众有机会就预算案内容向部长提问。 长约一小时的论坛中,王瑞杰听取民众提出有关各种主题的问题,例如相关的预算案好似一个大选预算案、立国一代配套(Merdeka Generation Package)如何鼓励保持身心健康活跃的生活,以及新加坡的出生率。其他民众也表达了他们对高昂生活费,以及中产阶级缺乏福利保障一事表示担忧。 超过500留言表达不满 有关的电视论坛在亚洲新闻频道(CNA)脸书上直播。留言区充满了网友向部长提出各种项目的问题,以及他们对王瑞杰的回答表示不满。 在亚洲新闻频道(CNA)脸书直播过程中,共获得超过500个留言,许多人质问公积金的提款年龄。失望的是,有关的问题并没有得到解答,因为并没有现场观众对王瑞杰提问此事。 质疑消费税增加 在发表2019预算案时,王瑞杰表示政府计划在未来数年,将消费税从7巴仙调高至9巴仙。针对这个事项,一位市民提问道,政府是否能吸纳食物等必需品的消费税。王瑞杰回答说:“在我们推出消费税前,我们已经非常仔细地研究过这个项目。最近这个课题再次引起争议后,我又在研究了一遍”。 然而网民对此回答并没有感到很满意,他们质疑消费税的调涨,甚至呼吁废除消费税。 财案没照顾中产阶级 除此之外,有民众表示新加坡的生活费持续增长,他问财政部长,政府是否会采取一些措施,帮助没有被纳入立国一代配套的群体。王瑞杰指出,政府需要保持成本低廉,这是很重要的,而且可以通过很多方式来达到这一目标,例如拥有一个开放和具有竞争力的系统,来自世界各地的进口货物,以及保持一个强壮的经济体。…

Lee Hsien Yang is not contesting in GE2020, confirms PSP’s Michael Chua

It’s been confirmed that Lee Hsien Yang of the Progress Singapore Party…