by: Ravi Philemon/

Who shaped the 90s?  As I pondered hard on this question, I realised that I can give credit for this to only one man – Mr Goh Chok Tong.

Even before he took over as Prime Minister, Mr Lee Kuan Yew had already warned him “even from my sick bed, even if you are going to lower me into the grave and I feel something is going wrong, I will get up”.

Under the watchful eyes of Mr Lee Kuan Yew who continued to remain in Mr Goh’s cabinet as Senior Minister, Mr Goh (it seems now), had no choice but to go about stamping his own vision of Singapore in a subtle manner.

If the repression under Mr Lee Kuan Yew was obvious, the repression under Mr Goh was ‘soft’.  For example, when Catherine Lim suggested in her column in The Straits Times that the People’s Action Party (PAP) is out of touch with the people, she was suspended.

Mr Goh then publicly reprimanded her by saying, “If you land a blow on our jaw, you must expect a counterblow on your solar plexus”. To this, Mr Goh added that Ms Lim must enter the partisan political arena if she wants to continue airing her views. Ms Lim subsequently apologised.

It was under Mr Goh’s watch that Medisave contribution was made compulsory for self-employed people; the Group Representation Constituency (GRC) system was expanded when the country was under Mr Goh’s care; the vehicle quote system and the Elected Presidency were also enacted during his tenure in this decade.

It was Mr Goh’s belief that Singaporeans must increase their assets so that they would have a larger stake in the country.

Towards this, Mr Goh’s government implemented the Share Ownership Top-Up Scheme in 1993. The scheme gave $200 to every Singaporean aged 21 an above who had contributed $500 to his CPF account during a six-month period.  With the money, members could buy Singapore Telecom shares at a discount. About 1.4 million Singaporeans (many of whom had no clue what holding shares meant) became shareholders when Singapore Telecom was first floated.

To enhance the people’s assets, Mr Goh also advocated the upgrading of public housing flats. This upgrading was to enhance the value of the flat, which would result in a windfall when the owner of the flat sold it.  The upgrading was of course tied to you voting his Party in with a strong majority in the General Election. Constituencies which did not vote for his Party, he threatened would turn into slums.

It was also the Government under Mr Goh Chok Tong which relaxed the stricter yester-years immigration policy of Singapore.

Mr Goh justified the need to import foreign talent in his National Day Rally speech of 1998 citing the contributions of foreign talent to Microsoft, the French World Cup football team, and the Singapore team (that included Permanent Residents) which scaled Mount Everest.

He said then, “while we attract foreign talent and welcome foreigners who contribute to our economy, Singapore must always have a hard core of citizens, cohesive and totally committed to the country, around whom we can attract other talent and build a nation.”

Despite his subtleness, Mr Goh certainly did leave an indelible mark in the decade of the 90s. His subtle messages of enhancements and inclusivity which were lost to many in that time period, were however so profound that they continue to impact the lives of many Singaporeans even today.


This article is part of a series where contributors were asked for their personal take on who shaped the decades.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Put Mah Bow Tan on “live” TV

Andrew Loh / The Prime Minister has been on national television twice…

在劳动市场,女佣有选择雇主的权利

《联合晚报》于本月16日报导,一名菲律宾籍女佣, 受聘为居住在四层楼排屋的家庭帮佣,不过仅做了十天,就对雇主说家太大做不下去而离职。 报导中指,当初花了2048元,通过力业女佣集团,聘请来自菲律宾的詹尼伦(29岁)。詹尼伦在9月1日报到,雇主也支付了首三个月、共1760元的薪水给女佣。 雇主卓太太强调,他们在两个月前搬进杨厝港一带乐舍山道(Luxus Hill Avenue)的四层楼排屋。女佣过来前,也已说明家有四层楼,还有一位88岁高龄母亲,但母亲身体健朗,女佣只是帮忙做家务和煮饭。 卓太太声称未亏待女佣,女佣每天凌晨6点起床,工作至晚上8点多就可回房睡觉,也没有限制女佣使用手机。 晚上10点叫女佣洗衣服 但是,9月10日晚上10时许,卓太太见丈夫出外打球回来,身上衣服流汗湿透,就叫醒女佣帮忙洗衣服。后来,她发现女佣呆站在洗衣机旁,申请委屈,一问之下对方说不想做下去。 卓太太表示对女佣表现满意,建议她多待一个月,双方可利用这段时期互相适应,无奈女佣坚持要走。 “我不想逼她,隔天就带她回去找中介,她跟中介说要离开的原因,竟然是因为我家太大。” 中介在扣除女佣10日薪资后,把预支给女佣詹尼伦的薪水退还给卓太太。…

港警开枪射向示威者,目前情况危殆

香港今日(11日)早晨在多区堵路和破坏设施,引发防暴警察出动,然而警方在西湾河太安楼追赶示威者时,向示威者发射实弹枪,送东区医院抢救,男子情况危殆。 上周一(4日)清晨,警方在将军澳尚德邨驱散示威者期间,因为想一座多层停车场发射催泪弹,其后发现22岁周梓乐倒卧在停车场二楼,并送往医院的加护病房,在抢救5日后,于上周五早上不治逝世。 据悉,有消息指出周梓乐是为躲避警方催泪弹或警员追捕而堕楼,但《立场新闻》记者调阅了闭路电视视频指出,并尝试进一步还原和分析事件细节,但由于闭路电视镜头不断旋转,未有拍到坠楼关键时刻,加上仍有多项疑点,至今仍未能得悉周坠楼原因。 然而,周梓乐的逝世也为警民关系的破裂雪上加霜,为悼念示威活动中死亡的科技大学学生周梓乐,今日发起罢工、罢课和罢市的“三罢”行动,现场爆发警民冲突,警方在清场期间,更是开枪伤了示威者。 据《丘品新闻》直播片段,一名身穿白T恤配有交通警反光衣的警员,在斑马线上突然拔出佩枪,指向一名白色连衣帽内穿黑色衣服的男子。 随后两人扭打了起来,正在直播的记者则表示,“警察拔枪”,而右侧有另一名黑衣人向两人靠近,警员一手抱着白色连衣帽男子,另一手将枪指向该名黑衣人,黑衣人欲伸手靠近枪口,警员便向他开第一枪,导致黑衣人倒下。 当时直播记者在听到枪声后立即后退,随即便再次听见第二及第三枪,导致另一名黑衣人倒下。 此次亦是香港仔反送中示威爆发以来,第三起真枪实弹打伤示威者事件。 据《明报》报道,该名中弹男子为职业训练局(VTC)辖下机构成员香港专业教育学院(IVE)柴湾院校的21岁周姓男子,在送院后发现右肾及右肝被子弹碎片割伤,肝门静脉被压破(crushed),消息指他接受紧急手术期间,一度心跳停顿要接受心肺复苏术,约10时半已完成手术。 据《BBC中文网》报道,在开枪事件发生后,一些不满警方行为的群众上前理论,而防暴警察则向群众喷射呼叫喷剂,又在周边接到发射垂泪但驱散群众。 对此,香港警察则发文告声明,称指控警察高层下令前线人员于今日行动中胡乱开枪,警方表示绝无此事,而且警队对警务人员使用枪械有严格指引,所有警察必须为自己的执法行为负责。 此外,警方于西湾河开枪现场附近的太宁街施放多枚催泪弹,有市民中催泪弹,须由急救员为其治理。…

周崇庆为电子支付广告争议公开致歉

近日,电子支付平台Epay因为争议性广告引起坊间注意和挞伐,该广告请艺人周崇庆饰演4种不同角色,包括印度人和穆斯林妇女,被批欠缺族群敏感度,对此星网电子支付公司NETS 也为该广告公开致歉。 在昨日(7日),周崇庆本人也在个人社交媒体Instagram上,为自己所扮演的角色公开致歉。 他于帖文中表示,“我在广告当中所扮演的角色已令许多民众感到失望。这些天未能发表我的想法,是担心事情会愈演愈烈。如今演变成这样我亦感到难受。” 周崇庆续指,尽管事情已无法回头,但他仍然想向大家表示万分抱歉。 帖文最后,他表示,“我们生活在一个和谐地多元种族社会当中,所以我们不应将所有事情视为理所应当。未来会设下更高的标准监督自己,为自己的家人、朋友、同事,以及最重要的大家,成为更好的人。” 日前,周崇庆在电子支付广告中一人饰演四角,包括印度人和穆斯林妇女,随后引发众人议论,被批欠缺敏感度,也接收到各界的批评,其中就有杂志编辑在推特炮轰:“2019年,新加坡广告还有“啡色脸”,我以为我们已经过了那个阶段。” 后来更有网红“美丽求求你”与其兄拍片讽刺,但视频公开后,矛头转向网红,认为内容因涉及侮辱性语言与姿势,引来民众谩骂及警方的调查,要求撤下,内政兼律政部长尚穆根更出面斥责网红行径“已过界”,试图挑拨种族纷争,迫使网红兄妹二度道歉。 星网电子支付公司NETS与前创意公司及新传媒也出面公开表示,“广告以提倡电子支付为主,仅向公众表达“每个人都能使用电子付款”的用意,却造成伤害,感到十分抱歉。” View this post…