Jewel Philemon/

The iconic words, “This is Home”, will never have the same meaning again after ‘Another Home’ was released on 28th July.

The parody music video, created and produced by local independent film website, SINdie, features ‘The Noose’ star Chua En Lai, as well as a platoon of other actors, including look-alikes of young politicians Ms Tin Pei Ling and Ms Nicole Seah as well as a ‘bear’ who plays a double role of Danny the Democracy Bear and the Ulu Pandan Bear, dancing to a remixed version of Dick Lee’s iconic ‘Home’.

The currently trending video has sky-rocketed to favourable reviews with many commenting that it is a “fantastic effort and extremely funny”, with others joking that “Lady Gaga would approve”.

Excerpts of a tête-à-tête with Jeremy Sing, the founder of SINdie and director of ‘Another Home’, exclusively for The Online Citizen:

The Online Citizen (TOC): What is The Other National Day 2011 Video all about?  What inspired you to create and produce this video?

Jeremy Sing (JS): The idea of making a National Day music video was born out of an attempt to do another one of our many film-community outreach activities, since SINdie is supposed to be a champion for local filmmakers and talent. But underneath that rationale was also really us itching to have some fun and give our annual National Day songs and videos a fresh daring twist! After 46 years of nation-building, We feel we should be mature enough to laugh at ourselves as we say ‘Happy Birthday Singapore!’. Singapore in the past year has been nothing short of dramatic in terms of the social and political happenings. Month after month, we had things to make us laugh, cry and comment about. The peak of this was seen in GE 2011 when many average Singaporeans stood up to contribute to the political rhetoric. It is almost like saying after seeing how Singaporeans have proven themselves to more politically engaged than we thought, this National Day cannot be the same again. So the video was our little contribution to a nation that’s awakened a little from political apathy. After what happened at GE 2011, this National Day cannot be the same again, we decided to make it different.

TOC: What do you hope to achieve by releasing this video?

JS: To be honest. Fun. And to test the ability of Singaporeans to laugh at ourselves. If you read some of the comments going on about this video on YouTube, It is heartening to know that most people take it in good jest. One of the funniest exchanges I saw was when a viewer responded to another viewer’s comments by cutting and pasting the dictionary definition of the word parody into the comment box. Ouch! Then there were the other set of comments that discussed or even listed the socio-political references. One viewer got ALL the references correct and even added in his own unique interpretations (that did not cross our minds) – that the swimming pool was a visual reference to the reservoir, a much talked about thing in the news given the recent multiple cases of dead bodies found floating in reservoirs. While having fun, we were also hoping to stir debate about artistic or even political expression. This video underneath the song and dance, definitely has the potential to provoke some reactions. And we were prepared for some backlash from the public. But coming out from GE 2011, we believe if we really wanted to see change, we needed to be part of it as well, in some small way.

TOC: When was this video conceptualized and how long did it take in preparation for shooting this video?

JS: Our journey to making this video started with an exercise, to interview more than 30 local filmmakers (plus some artists and writers) on what they would have if they directed their own National Day music video. The people we spoke to covered familiar names like Boo Junfeng, Tan Pin Pin, Glen Goei, Neil Humphreys and Ris Low (as a wild card). We then picked some of the best ideas and put them into one music video. But you know, GE 2011 came along and added a huge amount of fodder to our material.  So the GE talking points went into the script as well.

TOC: What kind of preparation was undertaken before shooting began?

JS: The most important things to the video were the actors, costumes, props and the availability of a swimming pool. The actors (in their costumes) were central to the video. The toughest roles to cast was of course the lead, who had to be able to keep the energy of the video up. We auditioned several people and also approached some professional actors. The tricky part was this was a pro-bono project and anyone coming into it had to be in it for the fun as there was not much a budget. Sponsors just would not support something politically incorrect like this. A casual catching up at Screen Singapore with Chua Enlai, whom I knew from years ago, pointed me in his direction in terms of casting. After some negotiations with him and Fly Entertainment, we got him on board! The other roles that were challenging (initially) to cast were the domestic maids. Several auditionees did not appreciate it when we offered them the role of maids until we convinced them it was a really fun dancing role. Along the way, a few bonuses landed on our laps and they included a Tin Pei Ling and a Nicole Seah look-alike. When the cast stood together, they looked like they were attending a uniform party. That was generally the visual theme we went with. The difference was the uniforms each represented an unsung hero with a tinge of controversy. Hence, we had characters like the YOG volunteer, the casino staff, the foreign construction worker. There were also the not-so-usual unsung heroes like the carpark attendant, the tuition teacher, taxi driver and the fishmonger! Some of the more interesting costumes were worn by Enlai and bear (which we hope SDP would be fond of). Enlai’s costume was a half-handmade kebaya fabric pair of pjyamas which we thought looked quite comical. Generally, the props, costumes and locations went hand in hand and the wardrobe and art department had to work closely together. Thank goodness for the availability of the swimming pool as well. It not only lent a very different ambience to the video but to the shoot as well. The cast enjoyed themselves so much they started a Facebook page right after the shoot to share memories!

TOC: Where did you shoot and how long did it take?

JS: The bulk of the shoot took place at Republic Polytechnic Swimming Complex. The other place we spent a long time at was Old School at Mount Sophia. Otherwise, it was all over the island! The shoot was 3 days.

TOC: Any interesting incidents while shooting?

JS: Of course, we hope the interesting things that happened are actually within the video itself. But there were some. Our pro-democracy bear (whose name is not Danny), won a number of kid fans everywhere he appeared. Maybe next time, he should appear together with Danny whom I heard has a huge fan club. Also, when Mint Leong (who played a certain feet-stomping MP) and the crew went to a HDB neighbourhood, with a garland of orchids around her neck, some of the uncles came forward to ask if the real Ms Tin was doing her rounds. It was at Race Course Road, still quite close to Macpherson la!

TOC: Any last words to the readers of TOC?

JS: We would like to think that celebrating Singapore is not just about celebrating the glossy and the immaculate. It’s about loving the quirky things that make us uniquely Singaporean as well. If this video sings with you, do spread it on and make Singapore’s 46th birthday a little different!

—–


Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

公积金局称申诉老翁已领出14万 网民非议当局公开会员财务个资

七旬私召车司机申诉,自己每月只能从公积金领取575元,无法负担自己和妻子的生活。但开私召车,又被要求要填补保健储蓄。对此公积金局在昨日在脸书发声明,这名司机在55岁时已领出14万元,更指如果当初他没领钱,每月领入息可超过1千元。 然而,公积金局的答复仍引来网民非议,有者质疑当局公开会员的财务私隐是否妥当?再者,这名司机质问的重点是,为何保健储蓄已有钱还要填补,否则将无法更新私召车执照? 事缘上月24日,名为克里福德(Clifford Theseira)的72岁私召车司机申诉,自己的公积金储蓄只能每月领入息575新元,由于不足以承担夫妻俩生活费用,自己只好开私召车营生,不过上了年纪又不能开太久,实则收入有限。 他提到自己的保健储蓄(medisave)户头还有6万元,可是仍被要求要填补保健储蓄保费,而来自公积金局的信函也提到,若不填补将无法更新私召车司机执照。 “(保健储蓄)里我有6万元,如果我在这笔钱动用前离世,我的钱会怎样?我自己的钱为何我不能用。 如果我的执照吊销了,我能不能申领福利?哎呀,这里是新加坡,是没有免费的。” 公积金局公开克里福德公积金个资 对此,公积金局在昨日的脸书贴文声称克里福德“未反映事实的全部”,指他在55岁那年已领出14万元,如果当初没这么做,如今他每月领入息能超过千元。 “再者,克里福德还联名拥有一座已还清的五房式组屋”。 公积金局称当事人可以透过财路(GIRO)分期填补自己的保健储蓄户头,每月缴付额估计不超过月入的1巴仙。“只要他和其他雇员一样缴交,他仍能在明年7月到期前更新执照。” 公积金局更扬言,克里福德作为建国一代,已经从政府度援助措施受惠。仅在今年就已收到保健储蓄补贴和终身健保的特别保费津贴,也获取超过2300元包括现金和公积金在内的就业入息补助。…

CPF: An ever moving target?

Leong Sze Hian/ I refer to the articles “Tan Kin Lian confirms…

Fire at Tuas South Boulevard raged for seven hours before being brought under control by SCDF

Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) wrote on its Facebook page that was…

林文兴:民主党非仇外政党 惟反对执政党失败人口政策

新加坡民主党财政林文兴强调,民主党并不是个仇外或右翼政党,不盲目排除外国人。然而,该党坚决反对执政党决策者拟定的失败政策,让外籍人士涌入导致本地专才(PMETs)工作被取代。 林文兴昨日在个人脸书贴文提及,或许有些人对于新公民或那些潜在公民存有疑虑,或认为他们会出于感恩,支持现有执政党。 这种逻辑看似某种程度上很合理,不过林文兴提到,当一些新公民住得够久,也面对基层群众面对的同样问题,他们也很清楚,如果不去作出改变是不对的。 林文兴坦言,该党成员做家访时,也会遇到不少新公民或永久居民。而当中有者的政治认知程度之高令人赞叹,看他们如何讨论诸如生活成本、公积金、公共组屋99年到期归零等议题,可能连一些本土居民都会自叹不如。 他强调,民主党不是仇外或极右政党,也不盲目反外国人,反之该党在全球各地和志同道合的团体、政党都有缔结友好关系。 ”然而,我们反对的是决策者制定的政策。他们失败的政策导致外籍人士涌入,致使本地专才工作被取代。“ 民主党在今年6月,也推出”新加坡人优先“的人口政策,非议执政党招揽外籍人士增加人口的政策。 他补充,新公民或潜能公民,只要在这里住得够久,也同样会对许多失败政策的影响感同身受,他提倡不必然带着歧视,反之敞开心扉和他们联系起来,推动改变的风潮。 ”同心协力才不会失去希望,如果不这么做,那我们连最后一份的人性也无存。“ 林文兴昨日也偕同民主党副主席陈两裕、中委达曼胡理(Damanhuri Abas)、社区助理Fadly Azad等人,探访了马西岭的居民。该党积极走访该选区,相信也摩拳擦掌备战选举。…