by: Gordon Lee/

Recent days have seen much talk about public transport in Singapore – Public Transport Council (PTC) has also allowed Singapore’s two public transport operators (PTOs) to increase their fares this year.

The Minister of Transport, Lui Tuck Yew, has repeatedly rebuffed calls by NCMP Gerald Giam of the Workers’ Party for public transport in Singapore to be nationalised. The Transport Minister in effect prophesied ‘apocalypse’ should such a situation occur.

However, in practice, the fact is that public transport is already nationalised! SMRT Corporation is owned by Ho Ching’s Temasek Holdings through their 54% controlling stake[1], and in turn, Temasek Holdings is fully owned by the Government of Singapore. The Singapore Labour Foundation (a statutory board), also has shares in ComfortDelgro who is the major shareholder of SBS Transit.”[2]

Yet, even though the Government ought to be concerned about the quality of service provided, the arrangement of the Government owning shares in publicly-listed firms skew that relationship into one where the Government, as a major shareholder, is concerned about the bottom line and profit margins.

This presents a conflict of interest at best, and at worst, a betrayal of its public responsibilities. It is no wonder, then, that the Minister is quick to defend the profits of the PTOs, saying “it is not unreasonable for the PTOs to earn fair returns from the sizeable capital investments required to sustain their operations and to invest in future public transport needs.”[3]

In return, a very grateful SMRT says that they are “committed to improving profitability and growing shareholder value and returns to our investors.”[4]

Not only has the dividend per share (paid out annually) increased 22% between 2006 and 2010, the share value has also increased almost 80% between Mar 2006 to Mar 2010.[5]

Besides allowing the PTOs to increase fares, the Singapore government is also very willing to protect the market share of the PTOs by maintaining the duopoly (which characterises the market) through its control of licences. Minister Lui insists that protecting the monopoly power of PTOs is necessary to prevent “cherry-picking”.[6]

More recently, it has also come to light that the Government has indirectly subsidised the capital replacement costs of the PTOs by extending the statutory lifespan of buses from 12 to 17 years, and that is set to be relaxed even further.[7]

So, why then does the government claim that public transport is not, in fact, in public hands?

The reason is clear, the government wants to control the potentially lucrative public transport market, but it wants to keep the market lucrative and profitable for itself. Full, direct ownership of the PTOs will place immense political pressures on the government to sacrifice this cash cow for the public good.

That explains the current arrangement of indirect ownership of the PTOs, allowing the Government to eat its cake and have it too.

Moreover, following a series of massively embarrassing blunders by Ho Ching’s Temasek Holdings, the Government and Temasek Holdings have to justify the investment risk that they are taking with public funds – and when it comes to investment, the best justification is to prove high returns. Temasek Holdings proudly claims to have given the Government returns of 17% compounded annually for the past 37 years since its inception.[8]

How this incredible figure is arrived at is indeed puzzling. At the height of the financial crisis, the “Intangibles” component of Temasek’s assets shot up 50 per cent from $14.8bn in 2007, to $21.4bn in 2008.[9]

How much of this valuation is creatively done in critical years to make up for portfolio losses is anyone’s speculation.

Also, are the returns on investment skewed by the fact that yearly government budget surpluses are transferred to Temasek, which then includes those interest-free capital injections into the performance figures of its portfolio?

Looking at the portfolio of Temasek Holdings also further raises eyebrows. Temasek Holdings owns CapitaLand and other real estate companies, allowing it to profit from rocketing land and house prices. Temasek Holdings also own other state-protected monopolies, such as Singapore Power, CityGas and MediaCorp.

This is yet another case of a conflict of interest that exists with the management of Temasek Holdings.

The Minister and his Government have to decide where their priorities and duties lie, and review existing arrangements in an open, transparent and honest manner which respects the needs of the country.


The writer is an undergraduate student reading Economics at the University of Warwick.


[1] http://www.smrt.com.sg/investors/Shareholding_statistics.asp
[2] https://www.theonlinecitizen.com/2011/07/nationalising-public-transportation-is-it-feasible/
[3] http://www.asiaone.com/Motoring/News/Story/A1Story20110714-289124.html
[4] http://www.smrt.com.sg/investors/documents/annual_reports/2010/pdf/SMRT_A_R_2010_Low_Res.pdf (p. 44)
[5] http://sg.finance.yahoo.com/q/hp?s=S53.SI&a=06&b=26&c=2000&d=07&e=5&f=2011&g=m
[6] http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/1143622/1/.html
[7] http://motoring.asiaone.com/Motoring/News/Story/A1Story20110804-292701.html
[8] http://www.temasek.com.sg/
[9] http://www.temasekholdings.com.sg/our_portfolio_financial_highlights_performance.htm

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

贸易战冲突阴影 我国下半年增长料放缓

新加坡贸易与工业部今日(8月13日)发文告,预测今年国内生产总值(GDP)增长率介于“2.5至3.5巴仙”,至于第二季度经济成长为3.9巴仙,比上季度4.5巴仙放缓。 与上一季度2.2巴仙的增长相比,本季的季节性调整年化基础增长率仅达0.6巴仙。原本政府估计增长为1巴仙,而路透调查分析师预估中值为增长1.3巴仙。 根据《路透社》报导,新加坡第二季经济较前季增幅小幅下修,政府称今年下半年经济活动活动趋向温和放缓。由于全球贸易关系紧张,下半年GDP可能仅温和增长。 在2017年电子需求激增,推动全球贸易增长,作为依赖出口城市我国今年已面临增长的高标准。续去年拓展至3.6巴仙后,政府将今年经济增幅定在2.5至3.5巴仙之间。 新加坡贸工部指出,美国与其主要贸易伙伴报复性关税和全球主要央行加息,都令我国以出口为重的经济前景蒙上阴影。 虽然美国较高关税对本国出口的直接冲击很小,不过,贸工部不排除贸易冲突有进一步升级的可能。这将导致美国与其他经济体针锋相对的情况恶化。如此,全球商业和消费者信心会大幅下降,随之就是投资和消费支出大跌。 房产降温  建筑业表现平平 政府则预计国内下半年经济增长放缓,出口和制造业将在较低迷的水平,继续支撑经济增长。在上季度受公共服务项目拖累,加上不久前政府对房地产降温的政策,建筑行业估计仍会表现平平。 金管局副局长Jacqueline Loh称,下调2018年下半年增长预估,在预料之中,也在该局基线预测范围。温和的通胀压力预计仍会持续,但当前的货币政策立场是适宜的。他说,2018年核心通胀率,在金管局1-2巴仙预估区间的上半部分。 今年四月,该局六年来首次收紧货币政策,并计划在10月再做下个决定。并在上月上修了第一季国内生产总值。尽管对前景抱谨慎态度,但分析师称今年10月,也有可能进一步收紧政策。…

First case of pregnant woman infected with Zika in Malaysia confirmed

Malaysian Health Minister Sathasivam Subramaniam said that the first case of a pregnant…

Census 2020: Singapore records slowest population growth since independence; increase in single individuals

Between the year 2010 and 2020, Singapore’s total population recorded its lowest…

日语回答日媒询问 前进党梁文辉:外籍PMET可减10巴仙

新加坡前进党助理秘书长梁文辉昨日(14日)在记者招待会上以日语回答日本媒体的提问,表示新加坡的PMET外国人才中,可以削减其中的10巴仙。 梁文辉昨日在出席记者会上,有日本媒体询问有关专业人士、经理、执行员和技师(PMET)的问题时,梁文辉则以日语表示,新加坡目前约有40万外国人才从事PMET的工作,因此可以削减其中的10巴仙。 他补充,“基本上,新加坡政府说,没有就业准证(Employment Pass),整体的竞争力就会受到影响,但我们并不同意。我们认为就业准证和S Pass是可以减少一部分,如10巴仙左右,这样就有数以万计的就业机会给国人。” 梁文辉也承诺,若进入国会,也会主动将提呈给政府。 梁文辉于1979 年获政府颁发海外优异奖学金(Overseas Merit Scholarship),并前往日本一桥大学(Hitotsubashi University)就读经济学。 尽管前进党在大选中并未获得任何席位,但前进党的成绩不俗,获得两个非选区议员的席位。…