by: Jen Tai/

I am perturbed by what I see along the streets of Singapore today.

In celebration of National Day, there are many national buntings hanging on the street lamp posts. But other than the obligatory ‘Happy Birthday Singapore’ in small fonts, the rest of the bunting design shouts out the name of the GRC or SMC and carries the logos of various grassroots organisations.  These buntings would surely be more appropriate for election rallies.

Along Lavender Street for example, the buntings carry big photos of the MPs of Moulmein-Kallang GRC  as well as the logo of the central CDC.

What’s even worse is,  the MP’s picture on the bunting is at least three times the size of the Singapore flag, which is tucked neatly into a corner of the bunting’s design. The way the buntings are designed, there’s a perception that the PAP and the network which supports them are using the Day to promote their own party and members therein.

I am especially disturbed and turned-off because National Day is now being used by one Party and is being politicised. It is alienating and not unifying. National Day has always been, and should continue to be, about the People of Singapore.

The politicians should place their own advertorial party messages to wish Singapore ‘Happy Birthday’ elsewhere, but please, not on the official celebratory decor of the nation’s birthday. Please do put aside your own political agendas and place Singapore and Singaporeans first.

Where are the glorious but simple Singapore flags of the yester-years? Can’t we have them flying proudly along the streets of Singapore unembellished with various logos and MP’s faces? I don’t feel the Singapore spirit when I look at these decorations, which besides being very political, is also flavourless.

Let’s try to keep National Day as it’s meant to be – for the people and not for any party.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【选举】国人为先党宣布解散

国人为先党秘书长、同时也是前总统候选人的陈如斯,今日(25日)发表文告宣布国人为先党解散。 文告称,在野党之间的团结协作,一直都是该党的原则,如同在2015年大选,也秉持该原则避免三角战。 陈如斯在文告内也表示,新加坡在野党需要更强大的力量与执政党抗衡,帮助人民发声。自2015年大选后,他们一直坚守信念,甚至转派一些成员加入其他政党,并指出,一些前成员如今活跃在不同的政党中。 “新加坡需要更强大的在野党监督政府,及为人民发声,我们相信通过合并能够实现强而有力的在野党,因此决定解散政党。” 陈如斯也表示,这是经过深思熟虑,也相信此一举动将是有利新加坡人民,并感谢支持者多年来的支持。该党也呼吁党员加入并协助其他符合他们理念的政党。 今年1月,本社报道,国人为先党(Singaporean First Party)、民主进步党(DPP)、人民力量党(PPP)和革新党,原本有计划组成联盟迎战来届大选。

为辩论贸易课题 中美主播隔空“舌战”

美国霍士财经频道女主播翠西(Trish Regan),于今早八时邀请中国环球电视网(CGTN)女主播刘欣作为其节目《黄金时间》嘉宾,针对中美贸易战课题展开公开辩论。 翠西一开始说明,这是难得的机会,让美国观众在此课题上聆听不同的观点,翠西表示自己不代表美国政府,而其“辩论对手”则代表中国共产党,惟她在节目中愿意欢迎各种异议。 刘欣一开始则澄清,本身并非中国共产党员,不应假定她是为中国政府说话,而她是作为一名中国环球电视网记者与特里斯对话。不过翠西则嘀咕说其实CGTN也是共产党的一部分。 翠西首先询问刘欣意见,即中美之间有没有可能达成协议,对此刘欣称自己没有内部消息,所以不清楚中美贸易谈判会有往哪进展,但认为中国政府已经非常明确地表明立场,除非美方也对中国谈判团表达尊重,愿意谈判而不是利用外部施压,那么协议还可能达成,否则恐怕对立还会持续。 翠西则回应自己也不认为贸易战对谁会有好处,“我真的希望可以解决,”但她也抛出知识产权问题,也列举出一些中国企业盗窃知识产权的例子。他说美国企业可能投入钜资、耗费十几年才研发成功,又如何让他们承担在中国概念、研究被盗窃的风险。 刘欣则回应,翠西可访问那些到中国营业的美企他们的看法,“但据我了解他们当中许多都盈利颇丰,而且大部分也愿意继续投资在中国,然而川普政府却让前景增添不确定。” 刘欣不否认又出现盗窃知识产权、商业机密的问题,但中国政府和人民对于知识产权保护是有共识的;再者,盗窃产权问题在各国都有,在美国也有企业相互诉讼对方盗版,不能以偏概全。 当翠西问道有关华为是否愿意与美国共享它的先进技术,刘欣认为若双方互惠互利、相互学习,照规矩付费是没问题的,中美都在彼此学习。“我们可以互惠互利,就我个人而言,我学习英文,因为我有一个美国的老师,我跟美国的朋友去学。” 翠西:何时中国才会停止跟世界银行借钱 接下来翠西再抛出一个辛辣问题,她指中国已然是全球第二大经济体,但何时才肯放下发展中国家身份,不再向世界银行借钱? 刘欣则回应:“我们也想壮大,不想被一直看扁成侏儒、贫穷国家,但视你如何定义发展中国家,中国有14亿人口,是美国的三倍,人均GDP还不到美国的六分之一,甚至还不如欧洲一些发达国家。”…

SDP’s youth wing – who’s in charge?

~by: Ravi Philemon~ Update: Mr Seelan Palay who has been a long-term…

Derogatory term used by ST to describe deaf people

The following letter was rejected for publication by the Straits Times’ Forum…