One of our readers sent in a letter to Public Transport Council (PTC) last year, suggesting enhancements to their framework to ensure compliance to Quality of Service (QoS) standards.  We publish here, our readers email and PTC’s response.


Our readers email dated 14 Sep 2010:

Dear Sir / Madam,
I am a regular user of the public transport system.

My recent (over the past year) commuter experiences on the buses and trains have prompted me to question about whether the Quality of Service (QoS) Standards conducted by the Public Transport Council (PTC) are reflective of the experiences facing the average commuter, and if not, whether the system could be enhanced to provide a more accurate and comprehensive framework to ensure compliance of QoS Standards.

In light of the high costs associated with owning a car in land scarce Singapore, I am a proponent of the existence of the PTC as the independent regulator to oversee the fair management of the public transport system here. As a commuter, it is heartening to know that the PTC has already committed to establishing a framework (the QoS Standards) to define the level of service and performance that the commuter should expect to receive for their hard earned dollar. However, my main concern as a commuter is about how the assessment of QoS Standards is currently being conducted.

On that note, I would strongly urge the PTC to be transparent to the general public about when (and how often) inspections are conducted during the assessment of QoS Standards reporting. As a commuter, I would like to know whether the PTC has established guidelines about when (and how often) inspections are conducted before each 6-monthly report is released, to ensure that the assessment conducted was comprehensive and reflective of the services provided by the transport operators.

As an added measure, it would be helpful for the PTC to host feedback sessions for the general public to gather qualitative feedback about the performance of transport operators from a commuters’ point of view.

Ultimately, I hope that the PTC will strive to allow members of the public to report on instances where they feel that QoS Standards have been breached. It would be easy (and virtually costless) for the PTC to create a web page for commuters to log their information and to upload any supporting video or photographic evidence of the alleged breach – this would be similar to the way that the Singapore Police Force has engaged the public through their Neighbourhood Watch programmes. I believe that the QoS Standards which have been established are simple enough for all commuters to internalise and objectively assess, particularly with respect to standards about scheduled headway and loading. With the advent of video-enabled mobile phones and other hand-held devices, virtually every commuter would have the capability to assist the PTC in their monitoring of service standards. This system would additionally create the following benefits:

Allow real-time monitoring of QoS Standards adherence in any location, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week

By allowing commuters to upload videos onto the webpage, the PTC can get real-time feedback from commuters about operators’ adherence to QoS Standards on any route, at any given time. This would be especially useful in dealing with ad-hoc and unplanned stoppages which affect service routes;

Reduce the time and resources required for PTC officers to ensure compliance of QoS Standards

Instead of deploying officers to conduct random checks on routes, it would be more efficient for officers to oversee the information uploaded onto the webpage and conduct inspections in-person only on identified trouble spots;

Increase the timeliness and quality of services offered by the transport operators

By allowing commuters to make submissions to the webpage, the PTC will garner a larger sample set of data on the compliance of transport operators to the QoS Standards. This should not be meant to further punish or shame transport operators but rather, provide a much more accurate and comprehensive assessment of the services provided by operators. From a commuters perspective, it is hoped that a more transparent and dynamic feedback system will hold operators more accountable to improve the timeliness and quality of their services; and

Increase the level of engagement between commuters, PTC and transport operators

This system will increase the level of engagement between commuters, the PTC and transport operators, and encourage all parties to play their part in raising the standards of our public transport system. This system will allow commuters to feel that their voices are heard and that there is a transparent platform for them to provide honest feedback about QoS Standards compliance. The PTC will be able to win over the hearts of the general public if it is being seen to actively engage the commuter and follow-through on its role as a credible and independent regulator of the public transport system. Transport operators will also be able to receive a more accurate and comprehensive assessment on how their services are performing.

I would like the PTC to consider the points listed above and would make myself available, should you require any further clarification.

I look forward to your prompt response.

Sincerely,

D Tay (Mr)

PTC’s response dated 15 September 2010:

Dear Mr Tay

Thank you for your kind suggestions and points of interest. Please allow me to share that the actual performance of bus services is continuously tracked by the bus operators’ computerised fleet operation and management systems. Based on these databases, performance reports of all bus services are submitted to the PTC every month, and the PTC will assess the operators’ compliance with the QoS standards. To ensure that these performance reports are accurate and complete, the PTC together with its technical agent, the Land Transport Authority, regularly audits the operators’ reporting processes and systems.

The PTC also conducts an additional layer of checks to ascertain that the performance data actually matches commuters’ experience on the ground. The PTC conducts multiple on-site audits or spot checks every month. Such checks are done on selected bus services as well as those bus services with service lapses experienced by commuters and reported through feedback channels. Whilst we are not able to to host public sessions, nevertheless, we are always open to feedback, thus the home page of our website has recently been further enhanced to garner feedback from commuters. If any service lapse is identified, operators are asked to account for, and more importantly, take immediate action to rectify them, even before the PTC announces the results of its 6-monthly review of the operators’ performance against the QoS standards in April and October every year.

Nonetheless, there will be challenges on the ground, such as a shortage of buses or of bus captains. Issues such as occasional traffic jams will also throw bus services off-schedule. It would be unrealistic to expect 100% compliance all the time. Instead, we aim to incentivise the operators to meet real-world challenges dynamically, and to improve their performance on a continuous basis. In the most recent review period, the operators have indeed improved their performance, compared to the previous period.

The PTC will continue to monitor the bus operators’ performance and review the standards periodically to ensure they remain relevant to commuters’ travelling experience on public transport.

We appreciate such feedback and thank you for writing in.

xxx
for Secretary
Public Transport Council

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【武汉冠状病毒】对药物没反应 一孟加拉籍患者情况危急

在我国武汉冠状病毒(Covid-19)确诊病例中,有一名孟加拉籍男子曾经出现“非常危急”的情况,已经在加护病房中渡过两周又一天,且对药物没有反应。 据孟加拉《每日星报》报导指出,孟加拉国外交部长AK Abdul Momen昨日早上和我国外交部长维文通电话后,得知我国五名孟加拉籍冠状病毒患者中,有一人情况非常危急,已经在加护病房内待了13天。 他指出,这名39岁的病患对药物没有反应,且之前也曾患有呼吸道和肾脏疾病。 他在出席活动后对记者指出,“新加坡政府为他提供了最高水平的医疗服务,竭尽所能地照顾他”。 另外四名同样在本地被检测出受到感染的病患,目前在国家传染病中心接受治疗,而五名曾和患者同住一处的孟加拉籍人士仍被隔离中。 他表示,新加坡政府正在确保没有其他的孟加拉籍人士受到感染。

读者:莫过度依赖战备军人 让专人操作维修复杂军械

一名读者投书到《海峡时报》,质疑是否应继续让年轻国民服役人员,或每年才回营受训数星期的战备军人,去操作、保养诸如坦克和大炮等,复杂且具有一定危险的军事器械。 名为Mark Lim Xian Jin的读者,对艺人冯伟衷的离世感到痛心,但他认为即使今日的国防部在安全措施上已作出不少改善,现有服役中,特别是装甲车辆操作的培训以及保养,仍有许多进步空间。 操作军用器械有一定挑战 他指出,操作这些军用器材本身就已有相当的复杂程度,即便只是驾驶军用车辆,都和开民用车辆有很大不同,有一定的挑战性。 “然而, 我们这些战备军人,却被预期生疏了一、两年后,回到服役岗位,就能马上熟练地操作这些车辆器械。” Mark Lim认为,应该在不增加每年归营受训期的情况下,给这些战备人员,有更充足的时间去重新适应和提升操作这些复杂器械的熟悉度。 但目前装甲团的营中培训,仍只给人员短暂的一日期限,去找回手感。…

Students demand an overhaul in NUS policy regarding sexual harassment while NUSSU Exco stands by punishment meted out to offender in latest case

Following the story of a National University of Singapore (NUS) student, Monica…

疑惑!尚穆根称转发假消息不对付,那梁实轩怎么说?

上周,科技与生活节目Vulcan Post,访问了内政兼律政部部长尚穆根。访问内容也由部长回答网民针对《防止网络假消息和网络操纵法》的提问。 其中一位民众留言询问,若个人分享了假消息后,是否会被判坐牢。尚穆根则回答,若该分享者是以带着善意分享假消息,将不会面临任何处分。 尚穆根说,“这不会带来任何的刑事与民事责任。你顶多会收到要求更正指示,所以也不用担心是否会被判处监禁。 部长也澄清《防假消息法》,只会针对蓄意制造假消息者进行判处,无论是意图从中获利或造成困扰。 他再次向民众保证不需为分享或转发出去的假消息担心,因为分享与转发并不会被处分。 基于尚穆根的解释,一般的分享与转发并不会被处分,但疑惑之处在于,为何时评人梁实轩在分享脸书上的一篇文章后,便被总理李显龙控诉分享假消息。 若分享假消息不制裁,何以梁实轩仍被起诉诽谤 去年11月,时评人梁实轩因转发一则总理李显龙涉及一马公司(1MDB)的不实新闻,而被控诽谤。 该文章内容指出《砂拉越报告》总编辑兼砂拉越,凯莉鲁卡瑟曾向马国媒体提及在一马公司案中,新加坡是“除瑞士与美国以外的重点调查对象之一”。该篇文章已被邻国网友大量分享与转发,转发分享人次逾两万人。 梁实轩只是单纯转发,没有留下任何个人观点和评述。然而,梁实轩三日后接获资讯通信媒体发展局(IMDA)的指示后要求撤下该文,而梁实轩也照做。 虽然他根据指示将其撤下,但他仍然收到来自总理李显龙的律师信函,辩称该文所指控的内容与目的意图不轨,有恶意中伤之图。”…