by: Ghui/

It is hard to imagine a time in Singapore when there is no Lee Kuan Yew. The two are inextricably linked and some would even say that there would be no modern Singapore without Lee Kuan Yew. Indeed, it is sometimes hard to separate the man from the country.

No one can deny his far reaching contributions to Singapore but it has reached a point in time when he should genuinely take a step back and retire for good. Far from aiding the PAP, he is now hampering their efforts at rejuvenation.

In an interview with CCTV, Mr Lee “warned of the dangers of Singapore moving towards a two-party system andelecting weak and ineffective governments”. Mr Lee is clearly an intelligent man. It therefore puzzles me that he would make such inflammatory statements barely three months after the worse election results the PAP has ever had.

With all due respect to a veteran politician such as Mr Lee, I question the logic behind that statement.

Political rhetoric aside, there are many successful countries in the world with two or more dominant parties. It is therefore a weak argument at best to imply that if Singaporeans voted for another political party besides the PAP, it would lead to a weak and ineffectual government.

Mr Lee further declared that he would be “very sorry for Singapore” if it ever went down the road of having a two-party system in parliament.

A genuine choice at elections is the hallmark of democracy. Singapore is supposed to be a democratic nation. Indeed our school children recite the words “to build a democratic society” as part of the pledge every single day!

What is the point of democratic features such as elections if attempts to utilise these features are dismissed and discouraged? Now more than ever, Singaporeans realise this and want a stake in their country. They want robust political debate and accountable leaders.

Above all, they want to have a real choice and to vote for the candidate they feel best suits the job, irrespective of party.

If Mr Lee goes on making assertions such as these, he will no doubt alienate many PAP supporters and reinforce existing support for the opposition parties.

Gone are the days when Singaporeans can be cowed by scare tactics. The political landscape has changed. With the advent of the internet and a new generation of Singaporeans who have either lived or studied abroad, threats and fear mongering can only go so far.

Since GE 2011, the younger Lee has indicated that the PAP needed to “listen to the people” and to rejuvenate itself. This show of contriteness is however destroyed by the utterance of such sweeping statements by Mr Lee Kuan Yew.

Mr Lee is an astute man. He must therefore be aware of the implications of his actions on the PAP. With that assumption, I must regretfully come to the conclusion that he is either misguided, oblivious or both.

I may not have agreed with some of Mr Lee’s actions but I have profound respect for the man and will not hesitate to give him the credit that he deserves. It is therefore embarrassing to read these interviews for such statements are beneath someone with such a fine intellect.

Mr Lee, please do not destroy your own legacy by making such ill conceived remarks.

I feel that it is time for Mr Lee to gracefully bow out and give the PAP a fighting chance.

It is time for Singaporeans to have a true stake in their country. There will always come a time in one’s life to let go and move on.

Mr Lee, with all due respect, that time is now.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

抨击现有公共组屋政策 半辈子供房  最后一无所有

针对近期总理李显龙在国庆群众大会上,宣称将确保提供国人可负担的公共组屋、医疗服务和教育,让国人无需担心。 不过,在总理宣布了数项新政策后,仍令一些网民感到失望。 网民Calvin Goh认为现有公共住宅政策根本就不是“可负担”,我们几乎花大半辈子,把大部分积蓄花在上面,但是到最后,缺什么也不能传承给下一代。 “当你买下组屋并偿还房贷好些年,房子应该属于你的。但在新加坡,到最后房子却不属于你的。你只是偿还房租和长期住在那间组屋。供了这么多年房贷,但最后好多人还是一无所有,什么也不能传承给子孙后代。” 他提问:究竟新加坡属于谁的?国人的存在,是否就只是为了还房贷和贡献给政府?我们究竟是为了谁打拼? 公共住宅理应负担得起 我指的是公共组屋,或者公共住宅。至于私有产业不管是永久屋契还是租赁权,都属私人“拥有”,开放给本地或外国人购买(设定一些条规限定只有国人能购买土地财产),又或者较少法规限制。 他认为,建屋发展局的公共住宅,理应让民众负担得起或真正拥屋。但实际上只要看看售屋合同,就很明白所谓屋主其实都只是租户。 公共住宅理应让人民有瓦遮头,不应让国人对房屋产权有其他的猜测。“我不认为用20-40年偿还公共组屋房贷是可负担的。真正的可负担,指的是国人只需要数年时间,即5至10年就可清还所有房贷。” 如此,在清还房贷之后,国人才有余钱储蓄,或追求其他梦想。 但是,在现有制度下,国人几乎大部分收入都花在房贷,可是一旦屋契到期,价值归零。形同公积金一样,所有的价值只能看,却用不了。…

会见人民活动仍不被允许 林瑞莲吁民众拨电或电邮联系

工人党阿裕尼集选区国会议员林瑞莲指出,根据环境局建议,即使阻断措施结束后,解封的第一阶段仍不能进行会见人民活动。 林瑞莲也是工人党主席。她表示他们也同样想念居民们,不过民众仍可透过电邮和在办公时间致电的方式,联系上议员们。 “如果大家要联系我,可以透过电邮[email protected],或是手机62855 173 (办公时间)联系。”他也不忘提醒大家,今天的天空特别蓝,也顺祝居民安康。 早前政府落实阻断措施期间,工人党即宣布暂停拜访居民活动。不过市镇会和议员们仍继续为社区居民服务。

DBSS – ‘Overpaid’ by 550 million dollars?

by: Leong Sze Hian/ with contributions from: Ravi Philemon/ The Ministry of…

A psychological perspective

Therapist Anthony Yeo on the Mas Selamat escape.