A political sickness is spreading among the nations, across First World parliaments and First World governments.

In America, we see Democrats and Republicans fighting over the US debt crisis. Voices of moderation drowned by polarizing, aggressive rhetoric. And while partisans fiddle around and pass the blame to each other, America’s economy burns. It would be just a domestic political tragedy, except that if America fails, all the world will suffer – from China to Chile, from Stockholm to Singapore.

In Norway and other parts of Europe, we see the voices of hate spreading. An extreme right-wing subculture has grown online, where diversity is a dirty word, where the world is divided into stark duality: “myself” and “the alien others”.

In Britain, we see toxic media. Telephones hacked into, lives destroyed, elections influenced – all in the name of “news” and viewership. Did Britain’s The News Of The World make the world a better place? Perhaps it did, for the editors who could – in the space of a headline – decide who would become Prime Minister of the UK. Editors who never found the courage to walk the ground, touch the people or seek a mandate at the ballot box.

And I worry for Singapore, because in the heat of recent months, I feel the beginnings of a fever: not the fever of inspiration, but the fever that heralds sickness. And this fever is spread by websites like Temasek Review and The Online Citizen.

TOC has published an article, “Statements like these do not help” (26 July 2011). It made certain accusations about our Prime Minister’s recent speech at a dinner in Parliament House.

I believe in finding the facts out for myself – no matter who is publishing the news. I have watched the speech on RazorTV, where a full recording is available to the public. It would have been available to TOC too.

Yet I do not know which speech TOC was reporting on, because their article bears no resemblance to the actual speech – unless you count 6 words lifted out of context from:

“We are looking for a diverse group. Varied backgrounds, grassroots, public sector, private sector, people with thinking skills, people with leadership skills, people with mobilisation aptitudes. People who fit the standard mould and people who break the mould but make a special contribution to the team. We are especially seeking party activists with proven dedication and skills in working the ground and reaching out to residents. We want people with different mindsets and experiences who can look at problems from different perspectives, and therefore come up with ideas from different directions. And they can complement one another’s strengths and weaknesses and represent collectively a broad range of Singaporeans. And it’s not just different races and religions but different segments, different interest groups, different age groups and different views on political and policy matters.”

Click on this link and watch from 01:38 for the actual footage.

If you take the time to listen to the speech, it is clear the PM is looking beyond any standard mould, because he wants diversity and change. Taking the underlined words out of context is at best negligent, at worst dishonest.

So what exactly was TOC’s purpose in publishing a contrived, inaccurate story? (I guess derivative fiction might be called a story too!)

  • Was it to drive traffic to their website, whose advertisements generate revenue for TOC’s owners?
  • Was it to score political points for themselves with their politician friends?
  • Or did they style themselves as latter-day crusading “journalists”, hoping to be the unelected kingmaker in national elections – like certain UK tabloids have been suspected of doing?

Whatever TOC’s reasons, all I ask is that they report accurately rather than being economical with the truth. That they provide something more than cynicism and the poisons of envy, anger and hatred.

Singapore deserves better than what TOC has been giving us. It is not too late for TOC to change. All it takes is honesty, accuracy, facts and the truth.

Footnote:

List of RazorTV clips of PM’s speech. There are more clips there too. You might disagree, you might agree. But please see for yourself what exactly PM said, in the context of his speech.

http://www.razor.tv/site/servlet/segment/main/news/66834.html

http://www.razor.tv/site/servlet/segment/main/news/66836.html

http://www.razor.tv/site/servlet/segment/main/news/66838.html


A response from TOC will be published soon.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

频陪同颜金勇出席活动 祖卡奈因或是行动党候选人?

大选将至,政党潜力候选人热门人物的一举一动备受关注,马来律师祖卡奈因上周连续两天,陪同卫生部长颜金勇出席选区活动,再度掀起他将成为人民行动党来届大选候选人的揣测。 现为瑞德律师事务所合伙人的38岁祖卡奈因(Zhulkarnain Abdul Rahim),据悉,其专长是诉讼、纠纷调解和仲裁。 他于上周末上午,进行沿户访问,随后在下午出席盘沙桥(Pang Sua Bridge)的启用仪式。周日,他则出席山景民众俱乐部的开幕仪式。有关活动中,也是蔡厝港集选区议员的颜金勇是活动嘉宾。 受访时,祖卡奈因不愿谈及会否出战来届大选的话题,仅表示目前专注在社区服务。除了颜金勇的选区,他也在人力部兼国家发展部政务部长扎吉哈负责的吉丰区服务基层。 颜金勇等未予以证实 颜金勇身为党主席在受询及是否派祖卡奈因上阵来届大选时,都没有给予正式答案。扎吉哈亦然。 扎吉哈于2017年8月在马西岭-油池集选区原议员、现任总统哈莉玛辞去议员职务后,接受李显龙委任,兼任马西岭区基层事务。此举引起人们猜测,吉丰区是否会在来届大选引来新的代议士,而蔡厝港集选区则必须要有巫裔代表。 针对祖卡奈因是否出战一事,刘燕玲则表示认识前者,两人是在2017年的杰出律师颁奖礼上认识。她表示祖卡奈因当时荣获国际青年商会“新加坡10大杰出青年”奖,而她是颁奖嘉宾。…

DBS to inherit 4K staff and “serious governance practices” from Chennai bank after merger

It was earlier reported that India’s central bank, the Reserve Bank of…

MOH: Update on increased capacity for worship services, wedding events & cinemas

As the number of COVID-19 community cases remains low, the Ministry of…