by: Sharon C/

The recent call for fare adjustments of 2.8% by the public transport operators is definitely not justifiable.

One of the reasons I believe that fares should remain status quo for now is because the transport operators are hiring more foreign drivers than locals, which means that even if fuel costs have increased the transport operators would be able to off-set that increase with lesser manpower costs.

In addition, public transport is a public good and so should not be profit-oriented.

Yes, public transport as they are now, is owned by private companies but aren’t they still regulated by the government? And since they are still regulated by the government, can they not approve fare adjustments until the operators improve their service?

In the past, fare hikes always came with the promises of better service. But were the promises kept?

We see more foreign drivers who are unable to communicate with the locals, and are unsure of bus routes. These foreign drivers, ungraciously slam the boarding doors on us even though we ran with all our might to catch the bus. And they often choose uncouth words over cordial ones when they need to give a reminder or a warning.

How many bus drivers actually greet passengers when they board? Yes, there may be one or two who actively exchange greetings, but they are the minority. What about the majority?

And I am frustrated even though I have only experienced these horrendous service standards and almost endless waiting times, for the past few years only (I’m a Year 2 Junior College student).

Commuters wouldn’t mind paying more if they can expect faster and better service standards.

Service standards which include shorter queues at bus interchanges, shorter waiting time for services, lesser technical glitches and breakdowns.

Not forgetting bus captains who actually behave like captains.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【冠状病毒19】因疫情受困房间内 客工只求“被当人看待”

英国广播公司BBC最近采访了住在宿舍的客工们,并于9月18日发布名为《新加坡:暴露了不平等的疫情》的文章,揭露客工在我国所面对的严峻情况,一些客工只求“把我们当人看待”。 其中一名受访者是来自孟加拉国的Zakir Hossain Khokan。他曾感染了冠状病毒,并被送入医院就医,之后被安置在临时住所休养,被送回宿舍后,才开始重新上班。 Zakir的宿舍之后也被当局宣布自冠病感染名单中剔除,所以他认为自己已经过了最糟糕的时段。 但是在今年8月,客工宿舍内出现新感染群,而他就和其他客工一样,被下令回到房间内进行隔离。 他和11名客工共处一房间,但在42平方米的房间内,除了六张双层床,别无其他。为了保持一些隐私,他们将衣服和毛巾挂在床前。 Zakir指出,“无论白天黑夜,我们都呆在房间内……这实在很折磨我们。就像坐牢一样”。“而且我们无法保持社交距离,因为这里没有多余的空间。” 当被询及宿舍条件时,他说道,“我自4月17日离开宿舍(入院),到7月9日才回来,但是没有看到任何改善” 。“他们说我们必须保持社交距离,但对我们来说,这就是个笑话……我们如何在这么小的房间内保持距离?” Zakir宿舍内的每个楼层有15个房间,可容纳180人,但是他们共享六个盥洗盆、淋浴间、厕所和小便池。 “他们要求我们保持清洁,但是皂液器内没有肥皂。”…

TOC Latest: TR accedes to Temasek Holdings’ demand

Netizens see broader political significance in TH’s demand Citing a desire not…

Mandating minority representation negates genuine cohesion and counterproductive

By Ghui As a layperson who found political consciousness when the concept…

Law Minister questions whose side is WP’s chief Pritam Singh on in regards to his support of playwright Alfian Sa’at

Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam asked Worker’s Party (WP) chief…