by: Sharon C/

The recent call for fare adjustments of 2.8% by the public transport operators is definitely not justifiable.

One of the reasons I believe that fares should remain status quo for now is because the transport operators are hiring more foreign drivers than locals, which means that even if fuel costs have increased the transport operators would be able to off-set that increase with lesser manpower costs.

In addition, public transport is a public good and so should not be profit-oriented.

Yes, public transport as they are now, is owned by private companies but aren’t they still regulated by the government? And since they are still regulated by the government, can they not approve fare adjustments until the operators improve their service?

In the past, fare hikes always came with the promises of better service. But were the promises kept?

We see more foreign drivers who are unable to communicate with the locals, and are unsure of bus routes. These foreign drivers, ungraciously slam the boarding doors on us even though we ran with all our might to catch the bus. And they often choose uncouth words over cordial ones when they need to give a reminder or a warning.

How many bus drivers actually greet passengers when they board? Yes, there may be one or two who actively exchange greetings, but they are the minority. What about the majority?

And I am frustrated even though I have only experienced these horrendous service standards and almost endless waiting times, for the past few years only (I’m a Year 2 Junior College student).

Commuters wouldn’t mind paying more if they can expect faster and better service standards.

Service standards which include shorter queues at bus interchanges, shorter waiting time for services, lesser technical glitches and breakdowns.

Not forgetting bus captains who actually behave like captains.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Single parent disillusioned with MCYS’ CFAS subsidy

TOC publishes here a letter from one of our readers: — I’m…

MOH preliminarily confirms 344 new cases of COVID-19 infection ; Total tally at 31,960

As of Monday noon (25 May), the Ministry of Health (MOH) has…

管你使用哪个途径 724入境马国者统统隔离

马来西亚国防部长依斯迈沙比利在今午(7月23日)2时的新闻发布会上指出,无论是透过海、陆、空途径入境该国的人士,就算从新马长堤步行入境的新加坡公民或马国人民,都将被强制送入隔离中心。 他指出,该国政府不再允许居家隔离,而入境者须在政府认证的隔离中心进行隔离14天。 至于入境者是否需要进行冠状病毒拭子检测,他表示,既然所有入境者都必须隔离,那么他们在抵达马国之前,就无需像之前那般,强制进行检测了。 “无论如何,这还是要依循他们出发地点的规矩,若相关国家要求他们在离开之前进行拭子检测,那么他们就必须做。而且,这也要看他们所乘搭的航空公司决定。” 依斯迈沙比利指出,政府允许来自同一个家庭的入境者,在接受强制隔离时同住一间房间。 他表示,比如夫妻、父母在回到马来西亚之前都没有分开,因此隔离时也无需特意安排,而12岁或以下孩童也可以和父母同住一间房间。 但是,在入住同一间房之前,他们必须提呈事前同意文件,“因为我们担心万一发生任何感染,而他们是在事前已交出政府同意书,让他们同住一间房间”。 他也提到,被强制送入隔离中心的民众需要承担两笔费用,即隔离费用和冠毒检测费用。 此外,他也宣布了另一项新措施,8月1日起,凡是在公共场合,如公共交通上,马国民众都必须戴好口罩,否则罚款1000令吉。 他指出,卫生部通报指出,大部分使用公共交通工具的人们已开始疏于防疫,而马国境内重新开始出现感染群,因此必须强制民众戴口罩。 他也鼓励马国民众,可以依据世界卫生组织所制定的标准,自行缝制口罩。

铁路运营成本增加 四年内将检讨调涨车票

交通部长许文远今天在国会上指出,政府目前补贴超过30巴仙的公共交通运营,并表示有需要在四年内提升票价来维持津贴。 “2016年至2017年期间,铁路网络的运营成本,增加了约2亿7000万元。” “由于通勤者支付的票价包括在运营成本之内,铁路公司目前正亏本运营。在最近的一个财政年度,新加坡地铁公司(SMRT)亏损8600万元,新捷运(SBS Transit)的轻轨部门也面对着数千万元的亏损。” 波东巴西国会议员司徒宇斌曾提问,欲了解最新的铁路可靠度、延续持续性努力工作和资助。 提高铁路可靠度工程为主要支出 许文远指出,增加的支出主要来自于多年来,在提高铁路可靠度的工程上。 他表示,目前的铁路在平均每行驶一百万公里后才发生一次延误超过5分钟以上的故障,比2015年的可靠度增加了七倍。 “在未来五年内,政府预计将会投入45亿元,作为运营补贴。这将会算入建设新线路的250亿元费用中。” 他说,直到最近,我国公共交通委员会(PTC)的票价调整并没有在方程式允许的范围内全面实施。 “如果我们严格准守该委员会的票价调整方程式,那么业者应该能够更好地抵消加大维修力度后的成本,但是目前这些额外的成本一部分由政府津贴承担、一部分有业者承担,因此不能长期维持。” 他表示,政府将继续根据该委会的方式运作,至到2023年。“我们必须严格遵守这一方程式,并在未来四年调整票价。”…