by: Sharon C/

The recent call for fare adjustments of 2.8% by the public transport operators is definitely not justifiable.

One of the reasons I believe that fares should remain status quo for now is because the transport operators are hiring more foreign drivers than locals, which means that even if fuel costs have increased the transport operators would be able to off-set that increase with lesser manpower costs.

In addition, public transport is a public good and so should not be profit-oriented.

Yes, public transport as they are now, is owned by private companies but aren’t they still regulated by the government? And since they are still regulated by the government, can they not approve fare adjustments until the operators improve their service?

In the past, fare hikes always came with the promises of better service. But were the promises kept?

We see more foreign drivers who are unable to communicate with the locals, and are unsure of bus routes. These foreign drivers, ungraciously slam the boarding doors on us even though we ran with all our might to catch the bus. And they often choose uncouth words over cordial ones when they need to give a reminder or a warning.

How many bus drivers actually greet passengers when they board? Yes, there may be one or two who actively exchange greetings, but they are the minority. What about the majority?

And I am frustrated even though I have only experienced these horrendous service standards and almost endless waiting times, for the past few years only (I’m a Year 2 Junior College student).

Commuters wouldn’t mind paying more if they can expect faster and better service standards.

Service standards which include shorter queues at bus interchanges, shorter waiting time for services, lesser technical glitches and breakdowns.

Not forgetting bus captains who actually behave like captains.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

921大选? 选举局驳:假消息

据了解,坊间传闻很大可能本月31日将解散国会、9月10日提名,大选落在9月21日。不过选举局在回复《8视界》的询问时驳斥此消息。 选举局指上述“谣言”并非当局发出的官方消息,而本地教师也未收到任何相关通知。 事实上,朝野政党和坊间都在揣测选举将落在什么时候,而各政党都已积极走动街坊基层,增加曝光率。 上月8日,贸工部长陈振声代表李显龙总理,书面答复工人党秘书长毕丹星的提问,表示选区范围检讨委员会仍未成立。当时已是毕丹星第二次在国会提问同样的问题。 除非议员每个月都在国会追问,否则没人知道选区范围检讨委员会何时成立,对此工人党前非选区议员余振忠曾形容,这对于民主制度来说“是相当滑稽的现象”。 选区范围检讨委员会的成立,旨在于选举前划分选区,也是迈入大选前进行的例行工作。 在2015年7月24日公布新的选区地图,提名日则是在9月1日,从公布选区划分到提名,只有39天。  

LTA awards contract for 60 Electric Buses to three tenderers

60 electric buses will be deployed progressively in the country from next year, with…

Olympics: S’pore women’s table tennis team bow out after defeat to China in quarter-finals

Though they put up a spirited effort, Singapore’s women’s table tennis team…

Workers’ Party shows clear intention to contest Marine Parade and MacPherson

Secretary-General of Workers’ Party (WP) Low Thia Khiang and Party Chairman Sylvia…