by Leong Sze Hian

I refer to the Accountant-General’s Department’s report – Singapore Government Borrowings An Overview, released in July 2011.

It states that:

“By issuing SSGS to the CPF Board and investing the proceeds from the borrowing, the Singapore Government is one of the few countries in the world that explicitly recognizes and fully funds her national pension obligations”.

National pensions fully funded?

This may in a way, be a misnomer, because the Singapore Government is probably the only Government in the world that does not have to fund its national pension scheme, as CPF monies are Singaporeans’ own money, and not “national pension obligations” like other countries.

Robbing Peter to Pay Paul?

The report further states:

“The investment of CPF funds by the Government relieves the CPF Board from taking on the investment risk of a fund manager to concentrate on its primary role as a national social security institution”

In a sense, we are arguably the only country in the world that pays its citizens as little as 2.5 per cent on its pension fund, whilst Temasek and the Government Investment Corporation (GIC) had annualized returns of 17 (S$) and 8.2 per cent (US$), respectively.

Therefore, we may be the only country which borrows money from the forced savings of its own citizens at as little as 2.5 per cent, and keep the excess investment returns to itself!

When and who will benefit?

As to:

“In accordance with the GSA, all proceeds raised from securities issuance, including T-bills, and any investment returns derived from the proceeds are paid into the Government Securities Fund. Payments from this fund are limited to the payment of interest and repayment of principal and are a statutory obligation. This framework ensures that the Government’s borrowing are not used to fund the Government’s expenditures and the interest payment and principal repayment are not subject to parliamentary approval.”

Singaporeans may never get to benefit from the investment returns, other than the receipt of interest and repayment of principal.

I understand that only about half of the annual interest on the reserves can be used. Moreover, the Budget is almost perpetually in surplus every year.

Also, since Temasek’s holdings are deemed as protected reserves, Singaporeans may also never benefit, unless requested by future Governments subject to the approval of the President. Imagine the following analogy:-

Your father ask you to save and invest 36 per cent of your income through him. He gets 12 per cent and gives you 2.5 per cent. The excess is kept by him, and if you have an emergency and need to use it, both your father and grandfather have to approve.

Will you save through your father?

57% of total borrowings in CPF

In this connection, it may be instructive to note that about 57 per cent or $179b of the total outstanding Government borrowing of $312b, is SSGS (CPF).

In the unlikely eventuality of a future Government deciding to allow Singaporeans to withdraw all their CPF at age 55, as originally intended when the CPF scheme was launched, the result may be a severe strain on the financial position of the country.

In this connection, GIC and Temasek’s holdings are US$100b and S$193b, respectively.

Perhaps the most telling statement is this:

“Proceeds from the Singapore Government’s borrowing are invested. The Government’s assets include investments in the Government of Singapore Investment Corporation and the Temasek Holdings”.

Because this seems to contradict replies in Parliament that CPF monies are (have never been?) not invested through Temasek.

Surely, some CPF monies may have contributed to our ability to grow state assets, before they are transferred or privatized to Temasek, and when cash injections were made into Temasek.

In summary, is there any other country in the world which does not need to fund its national pension scheme, because it is all the citizens’ own money, borrow from its citizens at 2.5 per cent, and keep the excess returns for itself?

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Worker’s Party seeks feedback on Redundancy Insurance scheme to help workers made redundant

The Worker’s Party (WP) proposes its Redundancy Insurance (RI) scheme to ease the…

Circuit breaker measures could be extended further if COVID-19 situation does not improve, says Chan Chun Sing

Following the ‘circuit breaker’ measures that have taken effect this week, Trade…

看病无需预约 服务具素质 2019全球退休指数马国医疗保健最佳

美国《国际生活》杂志(International Living),公布2019年全球生活退休指数,马来西亚被评选为全球最佳医疗保健胜地。 在该指数的医疗保健类別,马国在满分100分中得分95。《国际生活》杂志整理的报告指马国有13家医院,获得国际医疗卫生机构认证联合委员会(JCI)的认证,而且几乎所有医生都能口操流利英文。 再者,多数马国医生都曾在英国、美国或澳洲受过训练,可以进行全面的沟通,使得马国成为医疗旅游的热门地点。 “在马来西亚马来西亚工作的外派雇员可选择私立或公立医院来满足各自的需求。虽然私立医院医疗服务更贵一些,但是会比公立医院医疗服务更接近西方标准。” 报告也指出,在马国,人民不需要与专科医生预约,也不需要普通医生转诊,只需要在医院进行登记排队与专科医生会面。相比美国,马国医疗设施在价格上又比较便宜,价格上具吸引力,所提供的服务也有素质。 “药剂师与马国的其他医务人员一样,受过专业培训和具备知识。马来西亚人很友好,但更重要的是他们真正关心患者。” 根据今年的评比,排名第二和第三的国家分别为法国和泰国。 狮城不在评选名单 《国际生活》杂志每年都会针对全球各国进行评比,选出对西方人士来说,最佳的退休胜地。今年,包括马国在内共有25个国家接受评选,不过新加坡并未被列入该评选名单内。 事实上,马国在2017年也曾获评选为最佳医疗国家胜地,被指费用相对廉宜、拥有西方国家认证、无需漫长等待等因素获青睞,而最受欢迎的医疗服务包括整容、牙科及皮肤科。 而马国人民在公共综合诊所看病,医药费可低至一令吉,而槟城乔治市和吉隆坡近期也成为主要医疗中心,深受邻国如印尼医疗旅客青睐。

林鼎要求对客工宿舍疫情负全责 杨莉明:我没那么重要

日前,人民之声党领袖、惹兰勿刹集选区候选人林鼎,批评原人力部长杨莉明应为客工宿舍疫情大爆发一事负上全责。 对此,杨莉明称自己并非最重要的,而且相信惹兰勿刹居民不会将此次选举作为对她处理宿舍疫情能力的公投。杨莉明代表行动党在该区竞选。 林鼎多次抨击,第四代领导层缺乏作出正确判断的能力,并批评杨莉明在担任人力部长时,对客工宿舍的处理出现严重的疏失,理应为此负上全责。 杨莉明:我并不是那么重要 惹兰勿刹集选区人民行动党候选人之一杨莉明周日(5日)在黄埔小贩中心走访社区时,谈及林鼎的言论,杨莉明笑指,自己并没有那么重要,而且她也相信惹兰勿刹居民,不会将此次选举当作对她的公投。 “我并不是那么重要。我也不认为居民会觉得这是对我的公投。” 不仅如此,杨莉明声称许多选民也鼓励她,并指冠病19疫情本就是一个困难的局面,并以滚雪球形容冠病,以及它是如何让人措手不及。 “在这特殊的一年,都和我们的生活、工作、未来息息相关。事实上,我遇到了很多居民,他们给我了我很大的鼓励并表示如今是困难的局面。冠病19绝对是一个滚雪球。没有人会预料到。” 杨莉明:从未遇见一个客工要求道歉 她也表示,人民行动党从未停止进步,因此他们会专注准备。 “我们从未停止过进步,我们也不曾停止学习和专注在准备上,以备更好应对下次危机。也就是说,我认为我们的态度已经显而易见。” 询及政府是否应为客工道歉,她回应,目前没有遇到一名要求道歉的客工。…