It is a strange feeling to be confronted about something you were supposed to have said when:-

1. You did not say it; and
2. It is the complete opposite of your actual message.

This was the exact experience I had recently, shortly after speaking at a forum organized by the Institute of Policy Studies (“IPS”). Overall, I found the forum very interesting, and learned a great deal, from the IPS Survey, the various speakers and audience members.

I understand that shortly after the conference, various online publications attributed the following quote to me:

“Don’t focus too much on the 40 per cent that didn’t vote for you. We have to remember and keep in mind the interests of the 60 per cent that did.”

This quote was inaccurate. I have not yet identified where exactly this quote originated from, but I understand it was further disseminated by viral methods, such as facebook links, notes and emails. The impression to readers of this quote was that I felt there was no need for the PAP to change and I was somehow going to ignore everyone who did not vote for the PAP. Naturally, this upset many readers. Indeed, I would be upset if I heard that from my MP too.

In fact, the thrust of my entire speech was the complete opposite, and I discussed the different ways in which the PAP was renewing itself, in terms of its people, approach and its policies. I felt there were some things the PAP got right and we needed to retain, but my fundamental message was that I felt change was taking place all round in the party. This can be seen from my note shortly after the conference, outlining my views on the topic of party renewal: https://www.facebook.com/#!/note.php?note_id=216640668373224.

What I actually said, after a speech where I discussed the various ways in which the PAP was changing, was the following:

“I remember when we were going through the early stages and we were telling people, yes we are going to change this and going to change that, one of the things one of my friends reminded me was, you can change, but don’t change for the 40% and ignore the 60% that voted for you. So I guess that is the balance we will keep in mind in the renewal process.

I hope all of you will join me in that journey!”

That remains my message, and I am happy to hear ideas from anyone at all!


From Vikram Nair’s Facebook Notes

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

National Heart Centre’s action in Rachelle Ann Beguia’s case is flawed

by: Ghui/ The issue of “foreign talents” has been hogging the news…

为国家寻找最佳方案    马国元首逐个召见国会议员

马来西亚政坛大动荡,敦马哈迪受委任为过渡首相,那么新政府该由谁组织,国家元首预料将会在今明两日,一一会见所有国会议员后决定。 国家皇宫王室事务协调官阿末法迪三苏丁今日在皇宫召开记者会时指出,今明两天,国家元首将会亲自召见所有国会议员,让他们逐个觐见,以确保国会议员的政治立场。 他指出,国会议员们将分批入宫觐见,今天已有90名国会议员觐见国家元首了,而其余的则将在明天觐见。 “陛下是依据国会议员的个人身份召见,并和每名国会议员会谈两、三分钟,以便确定他们的立场。” 在召见结束后,他表示,国家元首将会根据宪法做出决定,即决定在国会中拥有多数支持的一方。 打包麦当劳慰问媒体 国家元首今天亲自驾车到国家皇宫外,会见在外守候多日的媒体记者,并亲自派送打包好的麦当劳,让媒体们享用午餐。 陛下坦言,了解媒体的工作,大家都非常关心目前的局势,“是的,我都知道,但请耐心等候” 。 “让我先召开会议,我希望我们能为国家找到最好的解决方法。”

DPM Heng answers concerns raised by the public regarding environment, politics and taxes issues

On Saturday (15 June), Deputy Prime Minister Heng Swee Keat took questions…

ICA cancels passport of Singaporean for breaching Stay-Home Notice requirements

The Immigration & Checkpoints Authority (ICA) shared in a press release on…