by: Eugenie Yeo/

I start off by saying that I’ve always been a proud Singaporean. Perhaps more so after a 7 year stint in Australia, where whilst I grew to love the quality of life that the country allowed me; I gravitated towards the pragmatic sensibilities that Singapore stood for.

I gave up my Australian PR to return to Singapore, because in my trips back here I found that the comforts of accessibility and efficiencies; as well as the genuine intent to cultivate a more vibrant cultural landscape, very promising for an eager, wide-eyed 20-something.

In the first years I was back in Singapore, I found myself becoming an evangelist.

Friends both local and from overseas were often subject to my ravings about how everything just worked here. When people were dismissive and negative about life here, I always rebutted with the same argument based on the following tenets:

  1. An excellent education system – particularly for the foundation years. We worked hard without remembering that we did; we had time for hop scotch and zero-point; and extra-curricular activities that weren’t forced upon us. And when we got to uni (overseas), we were well-prepared for the step up in education, and were generally well-adjusted due to the exposure we received.
  2. Things magically just work. Public transport worked like a wonder; buses were comfortable, trains efficient, cabs in abundance and very affordable. And we didn’t have to deal with crippling traffic congestions on a daily basis. Chores that would have otherwise taken a mind-numbing amount of effort and time – like registering a business, renewing a passport, clearing immigration – were a breeze. I heaved a huge sigh of relief each time I walked towards the immigration checkpoints at the Changi because this experience to me, represented exactly why Singapore got it so right. Things like that didn’t have to be difficult or tedious.
  3. A place is only as boring as the people make it. Too often had I heard Singaporeans (and expats alike) whinge about how little there was to do in Singapore. Well, I found great joy in walks down Arab Street and Chinatown, photography excursions to old HDB estates and Tekka market, big cookouts at home with produce from Tiong Bahru. Run out of options? A short plane ride and you’d be on a (real) beach sipping pina coladas.
  4. Affordability. Apart from cars (which I thought had good reason to be priced exorbitantly because it prevented the massive congestions that plague so many other cities from Bangkok to Seoul to New York) – most of our basic needs could be satisfied reasonably. Public housing made sure that the general population of Singapore had affordable homes, public healthcare was fair and accessible, food (supplies & dining out) was hardly cause for concern.

In a nutshell, Singapore got all the basics down pat. There was little to complain about and hence little to distract you from going forth to pursue the important things in life.

It’s been 7 years since I’ve relocated to Singapore. In the past year, I’ve noticed a drastic change in the Singapore I came back to. Apart from Pt 3 above, I’ve had to retract everything else I’d so fervently preached before about life here. And here’s why:

Education – I’ve witnessed my own nephew and niece being ridiculed by teachers (we’re talking about reputable schools) and let down by the system. Both of them were diagnosed with dyslexia – and despite early detection and submissions of psychologist reports, educators had not accepted their disability, and instead isolated them and ostracised them publicly.

In an extreme case, a teacher had reprimanded my sister for subjecting her young child through a psychologist’s test. Any self-respecting educator would know that it’s far more effective to detect learning problems early in order to put in place coping measures.

This still brings tears to my eyes because I saw the sheet-white look of terror on my nephew’s face the night before a Chinese test – because he knew that he’d flunk it and be humiliated in class. I cannot hold in any regard a system that has failed kids so young –that we boast of being an education hub yet have educators that do not know how to deal with different learning needs.

The basic efficiencies in life – are no longer so efficient.

We experience, read and hear of countless complains about the laughable situation on public transport; or the frustrating cab shortage during peak hours.

I waited 90 minutes for a taxi in the city area one evening – I must have called the Comfort booking line 100 times; only to be told 2 things: use the iphone application to book, and that there were no taxis in my area. I saw slews of vacant cabs driving past, ignoring the desperate waves from lines of tired workers. The iphone app miraculously fails each time I try during peak hour. In the past 4 weeks I’ve had to wait more than 30 minutes for a taxi, almost wrestling down others like me who’ve cleverly decided to walk ahead of me to get an advantage.

Affordability – I am part of the unfortunate sandwich class. This is a huge point.

Housing: My partner and I have combined salaries exceeding the pre-historic cap of $8,000, and we’ve been looking for a home to start a family that would meet our budgets for a year now. Resale flats have become exorbitant (really? $800,000 is affordable public housing? Who are you kidding?), not to mention the jaw-dropping Cash-Over-Valuations (COV) that owners are demanding (average of $50,000, said one estate agent).

Which young couple is going to have cash for the 10% down payment + COV just lying around in their bank accounts? Do we not think there’s a fundamental flaw in a public housing system that’s pricing out majority of the people they were made for?

I understand the need to be competitive and keep prices subject to market forces but when those forces compromise a nation’s reach for something as fundamental as shelter, the model needs to be overhauled. Can we not explore a tiered system in public housing to ensure that the folks who are in need get properly subsidized housing? Is it not right to favour Singaporeans over non-Singaporeans; simply because this is public housing, meant for Singaporeans?

Healthcare: Whilst public healthcare remains relatively attainable, the quality is shoddy and apathetic. When my late aunt was hospitalised at SGH for a long bout of stomach flu, it took almost 3 weeks for doctors to find out/ tell us that she had stage 4 colon cancer. They first said she had a kidney stone, then liver infection, then liver cancer, then stage 4 liver-colon cancer. In a span of 3 weeks we were taken through all phases of the emotional rapids.

When we desperately reached out for medical advice and guidance, we were simply told that the doctors would do their rounds the next day and we should just stick around to try to catch them. If we were lucky, we caught them for 5 minutes. Usually we just had to come back the next day and wait again.

I truly felt as though we were being punished for not being able to afford private healthcare and hence only worthy of sub-standard, minimal attention. We had a loved one dying, and yet, we were reeling from being snubbed by the system.

In recent months I’ve read loads about xenophobic opinions towards foreign talent in Singapore. I have a particularly strong view about this – because I once was in the same shoes when I moved to Australia to study and work.

At that time, there was plenty of public resentment against international students and immigrants because of the perceived competition they brought to the locals. Then, I felt that the Australians just needed to grow the hell up and stop whining.

I have no issues with the government’s plans to target a population of 6 million (we know there’s no way that’s coming from increased birth-rates given most of us of marrying age can’t even afford a home, let alone think about making babies). I even think that some competition is healthy for a nation that at times has become obnoxious, complacent, and spoilt.

But the issue is that we haven’t yet developed the infrastructure to support this influx of people. Clearly, Singaporeans are bearing the brunt of sky rocketing home prices, over-crowded public transport and spaces, and lack of proper assimilation of immigrant communities. We boast of top-tier healthcare and education yet the regular Singaporean encounters something quite different.

In other words, the very things that Singapore once stood for, no longer stand.

And sadly, the Singapore I once fought hard and fervently for, no longer exists.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

脚车与罗厘争道案:罗厘阿叔被判监禁7周、罚款500元、禁驾驶两年

58岁“罗厘阿叔” 张胜仲被判监禁7周,罚款500元并禁止驾驶两年,但被告打算对判决提出上诉。 2018年12月22日,当时58岁的张胜仲,和35岁的英国籍脚车骑士张豪宇,在巴西立第三通道和巴西立坡交界处发生冲突,两人在事后皆被控上庭。此外,张胜仲也被控于24小时内未向警方报案。 然而张胜仲面对的控状,于去年三月份,遭控方将从原本的“疏忽行为”修改为更严重的“鲁莽驾驶”,指控他突然左转罗厘并撞上脚车司机,导致对方自脚车上摔下,倒在草坪上。当时张胜仲也表示不认罪,坚称自己没触碰到脚踏车。 检方也将被告以前的罪行一并列出如意图伤害罪、非礼罪,并自2000年以来,他也相继犯下超速、粗心驾驶、闯红灯等罪行。 基于被告所犯下的罪行,法官则认为不能同意辩方的说法,但也表示不足以成为蓄意和挑衅的行为,因此将会给予较低的刑罚,也将保释金从1000元提高至6000元。 张胜仲打算上诉 询及判决,罗厘阿叔的辩护律师则表示,当事人打算对判决结果提出上诉。 骑士张豪宇此前承认两项控状:用右手将罗厘左侧镜敲掉的恶作剧控状,导致15元损坏;以及未在车道最左边骑脚车,触犯交通法令。他在今年4月被罚款2800元。

Singapore-registered Paladin Holdings is in the hotseat as questions surface about its legitimacy

Paladin Holdings directors include one German national and an Australian based in…

市民吁C级病房备空调 卫生部回复:去住A或B1病房!

市民莉莉(译名,Lily Ong)于日前投函《海峡时报》,申诉本地医院的津贴病房缺乏空调设备。卫生部在数日后复函,对有关的空调课题给出理由,并且表示已采取数项措施,以便解决。但是有关的理由和现实写照一对比,反而令人感到不能理解了。“难道医院的美观,比病患的舒适程度来得重要吗?” 莉莉在信中表达意见,提到C级病房的住院患者,仿佛笼罩在闷热氛围中,只因为没有空调。 信中写道,她发现很多C级病房的患者都是年长者,因此她建议应在病房内安装空调设备。她认为,在这个炎热潮湿的国家,以及受到全区暖化影响的现在,空调已然是个基本必需品。 她也指出,新加坡国际事务研究所预测,今年我国还会面对严重烟霾问题,但医院还让患者躺在敞开的窗户旁边,岂非令病患曝露在空气污染引起的健康隐忧? 莉莉的信函引起了卫生部的关注。卫生部的回函于上周(6月8日)在《海时》刊出。 为病患提供可负担病房 卫生部政策及基础设施规划主任Low Chian Siong,在回函中写道,“想住有空调设备病房的病患,可选择入住A级或B1级病房”。 他在信件中阐述了我国公立医院,为患者提供了安全、可负担和有效医疗护理,并且为了提供病患可负担的补贴病房,有关病房的设计旨在满足患者的基本需求。 已采取数项降温措施…

最新消息:纳吉确认被捕

大马反贪污委员会于今天下午,前往前首相纳吉住家,展开逮捕行动。 据报导,反贪会已完成调查报告,包括纳吉涉嫌洗黑钱和非法挪用资产的详情,认为罪证确凿,建议逮捕纳吉。 根据一马公司调查团队文告,反贪会成员在下午2时35份逮捕纳吉,协助调查与SRC国际公司案,纳吉将在明早8.30面临提控。 SRC国际公司乃是一马公司子公司,2012年在财政部旗下。 不过,反贪会表示,呼吁各界静候该局进一步的文告。 早前,首相敦马哈迪曾表示,控告纳吉的罪状“近乎完美”,需要长达月余的调查,就是希望能确保诉讼万无一失。