Minister for Transport Lui Tuck Yew recently criticised the Workers’ Party’s (WP) proposal for a not-for-profit National Transport Corporation to replace the current two listed public transport companies.

Mr Lui claimed that WP’s proposal had “serious downsides, chief amongst which commuters and taxpayers (yes, even those who don’t take public transport) are likely to end up paying more, and possibly, for a poorer level of service over time”.

He added that “it is the profit incentive of commercial enterprises that spurs efficiency and productivity improvements”.

Market failures in public transport
These are simplistic and tired old arguments about the virtues of private enterprises which fail to fully appreciate the economic reality of the public transport industry in Singapore.

Firstly, taxpayers who do not take public transport already contribute to the provision of public transport in the form of taxes that pay for the construction of roads, the development of rail lines and the purchase of the first set of trains on every new MRT line.

Secondly, public transport is an industry rife with market failures which the Minister seems to ignore.  The current regime where SMRT Corporation (SMRT) and SBS Transit (SBST) each provide both rail and bus services provides an illusion of competition.

The reality is that SMRT and SBST have clearly delineated areas of responsibility with no route overlaps.  This makes each of them a de facto monopoly provider in their own particular areas.

Commuters do not have the freedom to switch between providers whenever they choose to, nor do we see public transport operators (PTOs) fighting to acquire and retain customers like airlines do with promotions, discounts and loyalty programmes.

The monopoly status is also reflected in the consistent high returns these companies earn. Freed from the discipline of genuine market competition, they have few incentives to raise service standards and keep prices low.

To say that shareholder discipline will create such incentives is naïve at best, and wrong at worst. Shareholders seek higher profits, not better or more affordable services.  The government must examine whether a public utility should be owned and operated by what are effectively private monopolists earning monopoly rents.


Read the rest of the article HERE at The Workers’ Party’s website .

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

PAP’s Lee Hsien Loong has falsely accused alternative parties of being “completely silent” about tackling the pandemic, says SDP

The Secretary-General of People’s Action Party (PAP) Lee Hsien Loong had falsely…

残忍!从车窗丢弃小狗遗体 动物与兽医事务组已介入调查

日前,有人涉嫌在车行驶过程中将小狗丢出窗外,被紧追其后轿车的行车记录器录下并放到网络上,引起网民的关注。动物与兽医事务组也随之介入调查。 该丢弃事件发生在15日,淡滨尼附近的罗弄哈鲁士,晚上约8点左右,网友将相关视频放到Singapore Uncensored 上,视频约9秒左右,在最后8秒可见一个不明物体被扔出窗外,网友也将被弃置的物品拍摄下来,原来是狗狗的遗体。 对此,动物与兽医事务组表示将积极介入调查中,目前正联络提供有关消息的人,以获取更多资料。 动物与兽医事务组也呼吁民众若有相关证据或录像可拨打1800-476-1600,联络动物与兽医事务组,而所有提供者的资料将会严格保密。 动物与兽医事务组也呼吁民众保障动物福利是人民的共同社会责任。 因此若民众有目睹涉嫌动物虐待案件可以直接通过www.avs.gov.sg/feedback网站告知,并提供相关证据。 “与所有调查一样,证据在侦办案件过程起到至关重要的帮助,因此若民众能够提供证据,会对案情发挥很有效的作用。” 根据《动物和鸟类法》,初犯将被处以最高1万5000元的罚款,或被判入狱18个月,或两者兼施。

S’pore rescinds invite, Indonesia withdraws top brass from Airshow

After Singapore rescinded invitations to the chief of staff of the Indonesian…

“欠费是大人和教育部之间问题” 家长吁孩子不应为此受责难

社运份子吴家和在一项论坛上直言,因家长欠费就扣押成绩单,教育部的这项政策“非常不妥”;也有两名父母和众多捐款民众发言,分享他们对有关政策的不满,甚至认为此政策形同为社会“分阶级”。 吴家和是于12月21日,在泖生活馆(Mahota Activity Studio)举办论坛的活动上,如是指出。有关论坛获得约30人出席,其中包括受到有关政策影响的一些清寒父母,以及参与众筹活动替学生缴清学杂费的善心人士。 幼时被告知欠费,学前教师当场哭出来 论坛上除了吴家和,还有一名已育有三名子女的学前教育老师,达如格(Tharuga)。她分享到在1994年,还是12岁的她在面对有关政策时的处境。她表示,因为面对一些问题,当时其父母在连续数个月都无法成功转账缴付其学费。因此在领取成绩单当天,她被带到一个特殊柜台前,对她说到因为还有学费未还清,因此无法领取成绩单。 达如格追忆说,她听后当场就哭出来了,且还不是很清楚到底发生了什么事。她随后追问母亲有关事项,母亲立刻在当场付款,并且责骂柜台的女职员。 这可说明,有关政策已至少存在25年了。 嫁人后,达如格之前都在家带孩子,一直到身为家中顶梁柱的丈夫生病住院了数个月。当时的她,除了要照顾丈夫、支付医院账单、抚养着18个月大的孩子,肚子还有一个小生命,更需要照顾生病的母亲。 她表示,在紧急剖腹产分娩的三天后,就是大女儿领取小六考试成绩单的日子,她唯有强迫自己在手术当天出院,以便能够陪同女儿到学校领取成绩单。她表示,当时无法缴交全部欠款,只支付了50元,也告知校方会在年底付清欠额。 不满校方因此困扰孩子 害怕女儿面对自己之前的状况,达如格主动询问职员是否会扣押女儿的成绩单时,对方表示不会。…