by: Vivian Chueh/

Is the current Singapore the Singapore we really want? Perhaps, it used to be, but as a sixteen-year-old who grew up here, I cannot help but critique how policies implemented and systems which are in place, have so much room for improvement.

I was reading the open letter written to the Minister of Education by the Secondary 4 girl and I could feel my heart trigger a little – this was what many have been wanting to say. I’m of the same age as her, and I feel the same way.

In school, we were only told to memorise things word by word and at most of the times we don’t even understand the meanings.

I believe that Singaporean youths have talents. It’s just that they have not been trained to think critically or in terms of general knowledge. Their innovation and creativity have been stripped off by the local education system which only taught them how to memorize words.

Sometimes, I really wonder if I would ever apply the concepts I studied in A Maths, such as logarithms and binomials, which I guess would never be ever used after I step out of the school compound on the day of graduation. I went to research on the use of the binomial theorem, and found out that it was mostly used to calculate the possibilities in a gambling game. So unless I grow up to become a gambler, I don’t think I would ever make use of that concept.

I would like to study media in a Polytechnic after graduating (even if I do qualify for junior college), because I have grown sick and tired of studying things that are useless to me in the future.

But some of my classmates are not so lucky though, as they are pressurised by their parents and relatives, who still have the traditional thinking that JCs are better. And growing up under such an education system, only makes us less innovative and hence, supposedly inferior to the talents from other countries.

So who’s fault is that?

When I first spoke about my political views at an open house of an opposition party, many were surprised at my level of maturity, and that I am only a sixteen-year-old. Born in Taiwan and from a politically-connected family, I’ve seen how youths as young as 12 engage in politics in Taiwan.

I am surprised how Singaporean youngsters were so turned off and unconcerned about what’s going on in their country. It wouldn’t be a surprise for a sixteen-year-old to be speaking in political rallies in Taiwan or many other countries, but I see the opposite being true in Singapore.

When I asked my friends about their political views, most of them would tell me they are not interested. But to think again, there is a reason behind it. The reason being unfairness and predilection in this city-state.

I once read an article published by the mainstream media, about increasing the awareness of the teenagers on politics and public issues. But I think instead of promoting the awareness and giving the teenagers some space to think and analyze policies and issues, the article started telling them what’s right or wrong, which snips away the critical thinking of the youngsters.

I was abraded by the bias and prejudiced articles published by the state controlled media. It was quite obvious even to a 16-year-old like me, that many articles are selected in favor of the ruling party – especially those published during the election period.

My friend once asked me, “why are you spending so much time raising concerns to the government, will they even listen?”. This question precisely underscores the reason why many are unwilling to get involved in politics.

The reason I am interested in politics, is because I want to see changes.

But if the outcry and unhappiness of young people like me is not going to get through (as the state-controlled media keeps rejecting my letters), I, too, see no point in engagement. Perhaps, nothing will change.

Please do take a good look around you; at the Singapore that is around you. Please don’t be afraid to stand for what you believe in. If you see that things are not right, have the courage to speak up.

Don’t wait for things to happen; make it happen!


Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

PAP and alternative parties’ comments on key GRC election results

10 July 2020 will go down in Singapore’s history as a watershed…

印尼强调“零确诊” 驻印外交界却对检测成效感疑虑

印度尼西亚政府在疫情爆发以来,一直号称“零确诊”病例。 截至周三(26日),印度尼西亚有132例经检测后,均未呈阳性。 本周传出,中爪哇省的三宝珑的某家医院,与巴淡岛均传出有病患疑因感染武汉冠状病毒死亡,但当局回应,两名病人的检测结果均呈阴性。 该名三宝珑医院的死者为37印尼籍患者,其死亡原因为支气管肺炎,而另名死者则为新加坡籍61岁男子,曾于本月20日前往一家私立医院急诊室,其症状也和病毒相似,但当局则表示他并非死于武汉冠病,而是另一种疾病。 印尼当局称,两者都经过检测并呈现阴性结果。 虽强调“零确诊”,外交界却对此产生疑虑 然而,雅加达的外交界与公共卫生专家对于印尼的检测效果产生疑虑。 该国迄今未出现确诊病例,《澳洲媒体雪梨晨驱报》(Sydney Morning Herald)昨天(26日)报导,在雅加达外交界流传一份资料,指美国驻印度尼西亚官员曾向印度尼西亚政府高层官员表达关切。 美国、澳洲、加拿大驻印度尼西亚官员之间也曾讨论过此事。 报道也指出,该份文件指“我们认为贵国政府,应在侦测病毒上采取更积极的态度”,并指示外交官们应提供相应的关键信息。…

《联合早报》制视频 反驳马交长高度限制论述

马国交通部长l陆兆福,在前日于个人脸书专页转发一段视频,向马国民众解释,为何政府反对实里达机场落实仪表着陆系统(ILS),并呼吁新加坡修改起降航线。 对此,本地中文媒体《联合早报》,在昨晚也制作一段视频回应,指出陆兆福分享的视频,信息有误。 在马国的视频指出,为何要限制实里达机场落实ILS系统,并建议更改起降航线,是因为ILS对地面障碍物有高度限制。 根据规定,距离实里达机场三公里处,地面障碍物高度不得超过54米,六公里处的高度限制则是不超过145米。 《早报》视频则反驳马来西亚的说法, 指出新马两国采用不同标准。 视频称,马国采用的高度限制,是障碍物限制面(OLS),旨在确保飞机低空操作时能保持安全。 视频称,每个机场OLS高度限制不同,是根据国际民用航空组织(ICAO)标准制定的“第一道防线”,但ILS系统,参考的却是障碍物评价面(OAS)。 若根据OAS,三公里处的高度限制应是93.8米,而不是马国声称的54米;六公里处高度限制则是198.1米,比马国的高度标准多出53.1米。 视频称,所有采用ILS系统的机场,都是参照OAS,而不是OLS。制定OAS需考虑机场跑道长度、航线角度等因素,确保有足够高度缓冲区。所以OAS是较准确的参照标准。 视频也指出,在距离实里达机场3.7公里处,已有一座高104米的马国建筑,不过没有超过OAS限定的高度限制。所以即是落实ILS导航系统,也不会影响巴西古当的发展,该区仍然可以继续建高楼。 实里达机场距离巴西古当仅2.4公里。实里达机场预计在明年1月3日启用ILS系统。根据现有降落航线,飞机降落是由北向南,飞过巴西古当上空降落实里达机场。…

Unanswered questions on ministers’ pay

See Leong Kit / ( Writer’s letter to TODAY Voices was rejected…