by: Shawn Danker/

Sunday, June 5th 2011. Most Singaporeans awoke to be greeted by heavy downpour that they thought was great weather for sleeping in. Tenants in the Tanglin area of Orchard Road faced a very different scenario. Tanglin Mall, Forum Galleria, the St Regis residences and several other areas of the island were hit by flash flooding with mostly no advance warning given. The PUB blamed a technical glitch that prevented the flood warning from reaching the tenants of Tanglin Mall and St Regis residences as they were inundated that morning. The question that begs to be asked from this matter is: Even if the flood warning had worked as intended, would it have made a difference to the people affected in Orchard Road?

Let me paint for you a picture of what could have happened that morning: The flood levels along that stretch of Orchard Road rose fast, thanks to the ongoing downpour and inadequate drainage. An early warning alarm would have mostly benefited the residents of St Regis who could hop into their cars and drive towards higher ground. The tenants of affected malls would not be so lucky as there would be no time or even the means to move their inventory, let alone sandbag their mall in an attempt to prevent the water from breaching the premises. One uninsured private vendor from Tanglin Mall remarked, “Her instinct would be to grab her products and run.” A building that was flood free for over 15 years, was suddenly impacted although the ‘torrent’ was nowhere near the recorded high of rainfall for the month of June (67mm vs. 378.7mm).

What are some of the consequences that arose from the flood that drenched Tanglin Mall and Forum Galleria?

Financial Losses

  • A water logged and damaged inventory is a wasted resource that has to be underwritten.
  • The time, energy and money business owners spent cleaning up after the flood resulted in missed opportunity costs and significant sales losses for small business.

Structural Damage

  • Water logged stores could suffer from some form of structural damage due to extended exposure to water. The most ‘at risk’ shops are the ones on the lower levels of the affected malls as water flows and pools at the lowest point of a structure. This results in problems such as rotting, toxic mold, and possibly eventual replacement.

Insurance Cost and Implications

  • Tanglin Mall’s Cold Storage ceiling collapsed and it was fixed in 2 days. The repairs were covered by insurance but other shop owners might not have adequate insurance to cover their repairs.
  • Since insurance was used by most of the businesses to cover the losses from their damaged inventory, premiums for the area are going to dramatically increase because the location is now deemed flood prone and a risk to insure. If the malls pay for the insurance does this mean that the management is going to increase the rent? If the tenants pay it, then their business expenses will increase. Either way it is the small business owners who suffer.

Orchard Road Business Association’s Complaint

  • ORBA is justified in slamming PUB in its failure to provide adequate advance warning of the oncoming flood. PUB should have already known that the stakes of failure were high from last year’s Orchard Road floods. It is hard to believe that PUB was caught off guard again, considering that PUB has had access to years of historical data to analyze and predict any future flooding incidents.
  • It would have been helpful to have civil engineers, in particular PUB Chief Khoo Teck Chye around to address the devastation first hand. By being the first high-ranking official to be on scene, Dr Vivien Balakrishnan became the face of the issue and his presence became a rallying point for the tenants. His appearance was certainly commendable where in contrast PUB’s absence spoke volumes about the agency taking ownership over an issue that falls under their jurisdiction.
  • What probably stings the most is the lack of any form of apology from PUB on its failure to prevent the flood, or the lack of any aid rendered aside from being told that the glitch with the warning system will be rectified and they will look into improving existing infrastructure.
  • If financial aid is out of the question, then PUB should at least pay to hire one off workers to help with the post flood clean up and disposal of damaged goods. The management of Tanglin Mall probably paid to clean up the mess in the public area of the building, but that still left the tenants basically paying for someone else’s mistake.

Does anyone think this is fair?


Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Two Germans charged in court for vandalism and trespassing

Two Germans were charged in court on Saturday morning for their involvement…

金管局对三名涉内幕交易人士发出禁令

根据金融管理局昨日发出文告,三名交易员因涉及内幕交易,利用内幕资料在买卖股票和差价合约的交易中牟利,被当局发出禁令,禁止他们超过10年内,都不得涉足金融行业。 金管局对大华继显前代表E Seck Peng,以及首域投资前代表 Leong Chee Wai,发出长达15年的禁令。 至于另一位首域投资前代表则被禁止13年不得参与相关活动。 金管局称,三人在禁令期限内,不得涉足新加坡证券暨期货法令下所规范的任何活动,也不得涉及管理、担任董事火灾任何资本市场服务公司担任股东。 当局称,他们在长达七年时间内,涉及“提前交易”(front-running),利用职务之便套取机密消息牟利,赚取806万9000余元,触犯政权与期货法令。 今年七月,他们已面对法律制裁,Leong Chee Wai和Toh…

Indranee says meritocracy not to be blamed for inequality and social mobility; online users disagree

Minister in the Prime Minister’s Office Indranee Rajah said that the issues…

Alleged conman attacks 72-year-old man when he tried to protect his neighbour from getting cheated; Police asks him to make a magistrate’s complain

On Saturday (23 March), a 72-year-old man shared on his Facebook account…