By Ghui

void-deck
Singapore is a multiracial society with a melting pot of cultures. The four main races in Singapore: Chinese, Malay, Indian and Eurasian work with each other and live amongst each other. As a country, we celebrate, amongst others, Chinese New Year, Hari Raya Puasa, Deepavali and Christmas. In such a multicultural environment, one could reasonably expect that our common heritage as Singaporeans trump the racial differences. Sadly, it seems that despite living together side by side for almost 46 years in independent Singapore as fellow countrymen, the issue of race and the politics of skin colour still divide some of us.

By and large, Singapore is a society built on meritocracy. Of course, there are elements of inequality which we should continually seek to eradicate but these are subjects of another discussion.

As compared to our neighbouring countries, Singapore does not have government policies that discriminate against a particular race. The system is not structured such that an individual from a minority racial group would find it impossible to progress. It is therefore safe to say that for the most part, there is no institutional racism. However, disturbing elements of racial ignorance remain. These stem from the prevalent mindset of stereotype and generalisations which have proven hard to eradicate such that even after almost 50 years, many Singaporeans still have an unhealthy fixation with race.

For instance, there has been much criticism leveled at President Nathan of late. This in itself is a positive thing as it demonstrates that Singaporeans have been politicised and are more vocal in airing their views to ensure that they are heard. The negatives that have come out of this however, are irrelevant criticisms based along racial lines.  Comments such as “prata man” are rampant on popular news forums and defenders of President Nathan have been dismissed as other Tamils who are supporting President Nathan because he is Tamil. What has this got to do with his role as President? While I am no big fan of President Nathan (I consider him a complete waste of space), my criticism of him is based on the fact that he did nothing for 12 years but yet received a hefty salary! The same criticism would have applied no matter what his ethnicity was. While, he may be of Indian heritage, he is a Singaporean just like the rest of us. As fellow Singaporeans, we probably share more common values with each other than with our Indian, Malay or Chinese counterparts from India, Malaysia, Indonesia, China or elsewhere.

Similarly, while  I may be of Chinese descent, I am first and foremost, a Singaporean and would share more common experiences with my Malay neighbour as opposed to a racially Chinese person from China. I have no doubt that President Nathan feels the same way about his nationality.

Another example would be the recent criticisms leveled at Vikram Nair, MP for Sembawang. While his thoughtless comments deserved censure, our criticisms against him should be limited to his actions as an MP. Race should not come into the picture at all as it is irrelevant. However, there were many comments on popular news forums calling him a “Tamil FT” who should go back to India. Some even went as far as to call him the derogatory terms of “ah nei” and “Bangla”! While I am no fan of Mr Nair’s seemingly high handed comments, he was born and bred in Singapore and as Singaporean as anyone of us!

Besides, race has absolutely nothing to do with Nair’s remarks and to raise the race issue only serves to highlight the presence of deep seated prejudice!  In a multiracial society such as ours, racial tolerance and indeed racial acceptance is not only important, but absolutely necessary. How can Singapore survive if it is fragmented within itself?

To make things worse, Nair is not even Tamil which make the callous comments ignorant on top of racist!

Why this fixation with race?  Is it because we subconsciously feel more affinity to our ethnicity? Or is it because we are a young country? Perhaps, this obsession with race will go away in time? Whatever the reasons may be, we should not focus on our physical differences for these are superficial. What we should instead focus on are our shared experiences (which are many).

Our myriad of cultures blended together is a beautiful and unique feature of Singapore. It’s rich diversity can be seen in the festivals we celebrate, the food we eat and the languages we speak. This amazing mix is a stimulus to creativity that we should cherish, appreciate and be proud of. As Singaporeans, we must collectively make an effort to view ourselves as Singaporeans above all else.  We are not  just Malay, Indian, Chinese or Eurasian but Singaporeans of various racial heritage. There should be no artificial lines drawn around race. Singapore is for all Singaporeans equally

Racial tensions do not erupt overnight. They are brewed over years of misunderstanding. Lest, we check our attitudes, we may well go back to the racial riots of the 60s which will benefit no one and no Singaporean. To progress as a country, we have to first and foremost view ourselves as equal and cohesive partners participating in the same game. We have the same goals of wanting a better life for all Singaporeans. Beyond the superficial colour of our skin, we have all done the great Singapore workout and sung patriotic songs. We all love good curry, rendang, chicken rice, mee goreng, roti john, the list goes on and we all hate the Fun Pack Song. So, if we look beyond this artificial divide of race, we are not that different.

As fellow Singaporeans who love Singapore, let’s forget this inconsequential issue of race. It is only in recognising our commonality as Singaporeans can we truly progress.

You May Also Like

敦马:不会任相超过三年

马来西亚首相马哈迪透露,不会任相超过三年,且重申将交棒给现任公正党领袖安华。 马哈迪是在上周六出席第34届东盟峰会期间,接受美国CNBC新闻频道采访,透露他将在三年内退下,并交棒给安华。 CNBC报导指出,尽管马哈迪已公开声明将交棒安华,但坊间仍揣测马国经济部长阿兹敏才是前者的属意人选。 不过马哈迪则告知CNBC,自己已明确承诺会退位和安华是马国相位继承人。 他此前表示,马国政府需三年时间,将国债从80巴仙降至国内生产总值的54巴仙。对此媒体则追问,会否留任至见证目标达成为止,惟马哈迪表示“不会,我不会留任超过三年。” 今年5月9日,马国希盟政府执政一周年,敦马也重申会交棒安华。 在巫统时期,安华就是敦马的左右手,在1998年以前,几乎被视为敦马接班人。学生领袖出生的安华,视敦马为“导师”,在政坛也平步青云,官拜至副相。 但是两人在1997年金融风暴后,政见分歧扩大,敦马选择革职安华,结果促成烈火莫熄运动,公正党正是在烈火莫熄时代下的产物,凝聚反建制和有意推动制度改革的人士。 马哈迪与安华长达20年的恩怨情仇,早已成为马国人茶馀饭后的话题,但对于两人是否能真的一笑泯恩仇,马国民众还是心存怀疑。

One wishes for hindsight, another to rewind the clock, but none wants to face up to reality

They keep looking back and wishing for the impossible when the right…

Seven to be charged in court on 2 June for breaching safe distancing measures at Robertson Quay

According to Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA), six men and one woman will…

毕丹星:人民协会服务社区的价值精神亟需改革

工人党阿裕尼集选区议员毕丹星在本月29日发文,文章开端以“PA(P)基层”(PA为人民协会简写,毕君将之与行动党(PAP)关联在一起),揶揄人民协会与行动党密不可分的关系,直言现有透过人民协会的社区服务之精神价值观亟需改革,使之能与诸如正义、平等、民主等价值观相一致。 是什么事让毕丹星撂下重话?事缘本周一,友诺士基层组织“Simply Eunos”分享,声称两位基层领袖郭先生(译音)和爱丽丝女士,接到新加坡民防部队手机应用程式myResponder App的警示后,赶到勿洛水池路大牌602座组屋,处理一场火患。 该帖文指当时有垃圾槽起火,但所幸在民防部队赶来前就已扑灭,并提醒大家别把燃烧中的物品丢入垃圾槽里。 居民留言打脸基层组织 不过,却由一名网民Rosalind Lee,声称是也是该组屋的居民打脸友诺士基层组织的贴文有误导性,企图把灭火功劳归给基层领袖。 李女士指出,她在看到垃圾槽冒烟就通知阿裕尼-后港市镇会,不久就有清洁工人赶到现场,空手把垃圾槽拉出空地,并扑灭火势。尔后两辆警车和民防队车辆前来调查起火原因。 “我当时正好在组屋楼下观察该事件,除了好几个好奇路人,以及灭火的清洁工友,我很肯定没有其他人来处理这个火患。” 至于友诺士基层组织则留言澄清,两位基层领袖抵达时,火势已经被扑灭,该则贴文只是为了了提醒居民小心处理易燃品。 毕丹星也在脸书分享友诺士基层组织和Rosalind…