by: Kirsten Han
additional reporting by: Azhar Jalil/

Lawyers representing convicted drug trafficker Yong Vui Kong have filed a petition for a presidential pardon yesterday evening, after their client’s final legal appeal was dismissed.

The 46-point petition asks that Yong, a Malaysian citizen, be granted clemency based on the following mitigating points:

• his exceptionally harsh upbringing,
• his youth and easily manipulated at the time of offence (Yong was 19-years-old), and
• the remorse and reform he has shown since his arrest with a strong prospect of rehabilitation

Yong’s lawyer M Ravi argues that the long delay between sentencing and execution – currently at two years and eight months – has helped to justify commutation in other jurisdictions.

The appeal notes that this has been an “unique and exceptional case”, underscored by how Yong’s trial has helped clarify local law while questioning the constitutionality of the mercy process here.

Yong, now 23-years-old, was arrested in 2007 and convicted of trafficking 47g of heroin into Singapore. Under the Mandatory Death Penalty stipulated in the Misuse of Drugs Act he was sentenced to hang.

The President has about three months to respond, under the advice of the Cabinet.

The Yong letters

Included in the petition are separate letters from Yong and his elder brother Yong Yun Leong pleading for mercy from President S R Nathan.

“I fully realise my mistake and I am truly repentant over my smuggling of drugs in the past. I have earnestly changed,” Yong writes.

The petition submitted that Yong is “filled with remorse” and has become a devout Buddhist and strict vegetarian, keeping a clean record in jail while learning to write English and Mandarin.

“The thing is that I have been able to display through my behaviour that the sincerity was true,” he says.

Yong’s siblings regularly visit and have been “completely amazed by his metamorphosis”.

In his own letter Yun Leong writes of his brother’s filialness to their mother, who suffers from clinical depression and has been kept uninformed by the family of Yong’s death sentence for fear of a mental breakdown.

“Vui Kong has wishes and hopes – that he can see his mother again. However how are our family members going to do this?” Yun Leong says.

Yong Vui Kong’s story

The petition includes details about Yong’s life, saying that he had been born to an impoverished and broken family with his mother struggling to raise seven children alone after divorcing.

As a child, Yong lived on his paternal grandfather’s plantation where their family was “harshly exploited by his grandfather and worked in his estate without a salary”.

The petition then says that Yong left home at 12 to seek work and ended up in Kuala Lumpur, where he fell in with gangs and leading to his involvement with a gang leader known as “Big Brother”.

“Big Brother” treated Yong well, but also threatened and tempted him into becoming a drug mule which ultimately led to his arrest.

The petition pointed out that before and during Yong’s trial, the trial judge had called both parties into chambers and remarked that Yong was only 19 at the time of the offence.

The prosecution refused to consider reducing the capital charge to a non-capital charge.

Yong was sentenced to death on November 14, 2008. He appealed against the sentence a year after, and submitted a constitutional challenge to the mercy process on July 21, 2010.

On August 25, 2010 Yong’s family presented to the Istana a petition containing nearly 110,000 signatures from Singapore and Malaysia.

Chief Justice Chan Sek Keong dismissed Yong’s final appeal and upheld his sentence on April 4 this year.


Yong Vui Kong’s Family Plead for his Life from Lianain Films on Vimeo.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

要求阐明藐视法庭罪不影响参选资格 陈两裕申请遭驳回

新加坡民主党副主席陈两裕,因藐视法庭罪在今年四月被判罚款5000元。 陈两裕基于若罚款超过2000元,他可能丧失在下届大选的参选资格,故此当时要求法官判他坐牢,而不是罚款。但当时高庭法官吴必理也回应若有政治抱负,就更应避免触法。 陈两裕在上月,入禀高庭要求表明上述罪行不会影响他参选资格,理据是藐视法庭罪仅属“准犯罪”(quasi-criminal),有别于刑事藐视(criminal contempt),故此宪法条文不适用于陈两裕身上。 惟这项申请在今早被法庭驳回。在书面判词中,法官艾迪阿都拉(Aedit Abdullah)不同意陈两裕代表律师拉维提出的理据,反驳宪法中所指的犯罪定义很广泛,也涵括藐视法庭。 拉维则引述1988年大选的先例,指当时民主党一位候选人朱腓力(Jufrie Mahmood)即便被判藐视法庭罪,罚款3000元,也可以参选。当时朱腓力是民主党副主席,在该党一个论坛上质疑司法独立。 当时《海峡时报》报导,一位选举官指朱腓力所犯之罪并非刑事,其提名仍可被接受。 但法官指出难以引用该先例,因为当时报章报导未有说明何以选举官允许朱腓力参选的细节,也无正式纪录佐证;再者即便报导正确,也不代表31年后,政府仍需受到有关选举官的立场约束。 根据我国宪法45(1)(e)项,凡在我国或马来西亚法庭被定罪和被罚款至少2000元,或坐牢至少一年,都不得竞选国会议员。 将探讨是否上诉…

Health Minister “不三不四”? (Neither here nor there)

by Leong Sze Hian On 29 January, the Ministry of Health (MOH)…

A*STAR scientists develop technology to monitor how genes in healthy stomach cells are altered when cancerous

Scientists at A*STAR’s Genome Institute of Singapore (GIS) have developed a technology…

SIA gets massive S$15b bailout from Temasek to see it through COVID-19 crisis

On Thursday (26 Mar), Singapore Airlines (SIA) announced that it had secured…