by: Ravi Philemon/

In the State of the Family Report 2009, then-Minister for Community Development Youth and Sports, Dr Vivian Balakrishnan said, “In a fast changing environment, the family remains as an anchor for individuals and the cornerstone of society. Strong and stable families are crucial to our well-being. They serve as the first-line of care and support for an individual.”

Behind this statement (which seems fine on the surface – even inspiring), is a mantra -a philosophy – which the government of Singapore has not deviated from for a long time.

The former Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Community Development and Sports, Lim Soo Hoon clarified what this mantra actually meant when she said, ” We do not believe in social handouts. We believe the family is the basic building block of our society. It should be the first line of support in our social safety net if the individual needs help. Only if the family cannot help would we consider help from the community and the government”, while addressing the United Nations in the year 2000.

Our Prime Minister himself affirmed his belief in this philosophy when in 2005 he said, ” We must not breed a culture of entitlement, encouraging Singaporeans to seek Government support as a matter of right, whether or not they need it… The state will provide a safety net, but it should be a last resort, not a first resort… We thus avoid state welfare, which will erode our incentive to achieve and sap our will to strive. ”

The poor and the disadvantaged are already disadvantaged by the imposition of over 20 years of ‘Asian values’ which exhorts the virtues of hard-work and self-reliance; and when the constant reminder to take care of your own family – even your extended family – is added to that, it places an unbearable burden on the poor and the disadvantaged and it becomes a double whammy.

Those that dish out help in government (and affiliated) agencies are extra cautious that they do not erode the value of self-reliance and allow a culture of entitlement to breed, that they often overlook the obvious difficulties the individual or the family is facing while endeavouring to keep helps to bare necessities. “If they had asked for more help, we’d have considered”, they often comfort themselves.

These perhaps are the circumstances which led to the early ending of a young boy’s life.

Five-year-old Muhamad Irfan and his brother went into the care of their aunt supposedly because the boys’ parents and three older siblings are in prison.

Even if the aunt loved her nephews and may have wanted to take care of them, how could a 47-year old dishwasher who may already be struggling financially be in a position to care and provide for them? Did she have the capability to deal with a child who is over-active?

The case of Muhamad irfan is a sterling example of the government’s unwillingness to devote more resources into family and child welfare. If only the State had not just assumed that some relative would pick-up the children. Since both parents are incarcerated, why weren’t the brothers placed under official care and supervision?

Was a five-year-old sacrificed to our fear of breeding a culture of entitlement?

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Formation of Electoral Boundaries Review Committee announced on 4 Sept

The Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong has convened Electoral Boundaries Review Committee…

马内阁议决废除死刑 国际特赦组织:全球在关注

马来西亚内阁在昨日议决,将废除死刑,并在下周召开的国会下议院会议,提呈废除强制死刑法案。 马国法律事务首相署部长拿督刘伟强表示,目前政府仍在研讨一些问题,包括那些涉谋杀受害家庭、需调查和聆听各造意见。惟这段期间,所有死刑获暂缓。 刘伟强指出,内阁的看法是完全不该执行死刑。政府已告知特赦局,以研究对被判死刑案件的改判,确保违法者受到适当惩罚。 马国国会下议院将在下周(15日)召开。自今年7月,该国已宣布暂缓执行死刑。 国际特赦组织秘书长库米奈杜(Kumi Naidoo)认为,马国内阁废死的决定乃是一大进展,使之加入全球其他106个放弃死刑的国家行列,彻底放弃这种残忍、不人道和有辱人格的惩罚,全世界都在关注马来西亚。 她指出,过去因为执行死刑,使马国在人权纪录留下不可磨灭污点。对于宽容惩处的申请结果,死刑犯往往被蒙在鼓里,而他们往往在数小时前才得知自己将被处决。 10月10日也是反死刑日,国际特赦组织在文告中提及一名来自马国的死刑个案何有华。他在2005年因贩毒被捕,当时他只有20岁。 在2011年5月被判强制死刑,也曾向法院上诉被驳回。2014年,他向柔佛州苏丹申请特赦,至今仍悬而未决。 国际特赦组织欣慰马国政府实现人权承诺,惟认为该局仍需作更多努力,也希望马国国会能通过废死议案,让死刑尘封于历史中。 新加坡官方仍视死刑为遏制贩毒利器 然而,我国政府仍视死刑为打击犯罪的”工具“。我国外交部长维文曾在2016年,在联合国大会上重申新加坡保留死刑的立场,也坚称死刑在我国获得国人“很高的支持”。…

Can we have our holidays back now?

By Ariffin Sha There has been heightened public discourse on the reinstatement…

Can the Worker’s Party reinvent itself?

by David Lim Now that Low Thia Kiang has announced that he is…