Leong Sze Hian/

Over the last few weeks, we have encountered more than 10 cases of Singaporeans with HDB housing problems and homelessness.

There was a Singaporean divorcee in her mid 40s, who works as a security guard for $1,300 a month, who downgraded to homelessness.  When we asked her where is she staying now?  She said “Most of the time in the security guards office”.

Then there was the case of a 44 year old single Singaporean lady staying in a homeless shelter who had lodged 18 appeals to the HDB in her attempts to apply for a subsidized rental flat after selling the four-room flat in Sembawang that she co-owned with her brother. (“HDB: 18 appeals and still homeless“).

So why is it so hard to downgrade your HDB flat?

More downgraders than upgraders?

Thanks to the National Development Minister’s blog entry “Who buy resale flats”, we finally have statistics on the people who purchase resale flats.

According to the statistics, 8 per cent were private property downgraders,  and 37 per cent of the 34 per cent second-timers bought 3-room or smaller flats. Not counting the number of those downgrading to BTOs, and the fact that second-timers preferred smaller flats, it may indicate that the trend may be more people downgrading than upgrading.

I believe most people downgrade because they are cash-strapped, can’t afford to pay their mortgage, or need to monetise their HDB flat, etc.

Their typical downgrading problems are:-

  • not enough cash to pay for the Cash-over-valuation (COV), which is once again rising to a record high  (“COV for HDB resale flats rises again“)
  • no bank willing to lend them a housing loan because of a poor credit record, current or discharged bankrupt, having income of less than $2,000,  the loan amount  being less than $100,000, or having been sued for non-payment of debt previously.
  • the HDB refused to give a housing loan because those who have ever owned a private property or Executive Condo (EC) are barred, household income insufficient to support the mortgage and number of persons in the household (this hits particularly larger families), irregular income record, borrower unable to come up with half of the cash proceeds from the last HDB flat sale (regardless of how long ago), the entire CPF and accrued interest from the last flat sale which may have already been withdrawn for other purposes such as education, unable to pay the Resale Levy of up to $50,000, etc.

With recent media reports that even about 200 licensed moneylenders have joined the credit bureau, may mean that even more Singaporeans may have difficulties getting a housing loan, because previously only bank debts were recorded in the Consumer Credit Bureau, and not moneylenders’ debts.

In this connection, in the Parliamentary debate on allowing banks to start offering HDB housing loans from 1 January 2003, the then-National Development Minister assured the members of the House that the HDB would help Singaporeans who may face difficulty in getting a housing loan.

However, in the past ten years that I have been providing free financial counseling for the needy, I hardly see any HDB housing loan problem cases where the loans were made prior to 1 January 2003!

All HDB housing loans prior to the 2003 ruling were either HDB Concessionary Loans for up to two times, or HDB Market Rate Loans for third-timers, without all the complicated rules that we now have for HDB bank loans.

Have CPF, but no  COV?

To illustrate the difficulty of downgrading, with a live example, let’s do an update on the article “HDB: $431,000 CPF – But homeless soon?”.

Mr and Mrs. Lim received a telephone call on 27 June from the HDB informing them that their appeal for a $30,000 HDB housing loan has been rejected, and that a letter of rejection would be sent to them.

The HDB also advised them to go to Credit Counseling Singapore (CCS) to work out a monthly installment plan for Mrs Lim’s debts.

In my view, the HDB may be quite out of touch with the realities on the ground.  Mrs Lim’s estimated $80,000 debts cannot be negotiated by CCS with all the bank creditors concerned, because their net monthly income is not enough to support even the longest installment plan generally allowed by the banks.

I estimate a five year installment plan on her $80,000 debts to be about $1,700 a month.

Also, as Mrs Lim is already in default on some of her debts, an installment plan or even reverting to paying the normal minimum amount every month may no longer be acceptable to the banks, because it is already in the hands of the debt collector or lawyers.

After struggling for the past seven years, due to Mr Lim’s business failure during the 2003 SARS crisis, they are at their wits end, and have already sold their EC, in a final act of desperation with the approval of the Official Assignee.

Why do we call it a final act of desperation?  Because if the wife is sued by any of her creditors for bankruptcy, the only avenue and hope of selling their EC to downgrade to a resale flat, may no longer be possible.

Based on the information and documents given to us, our best estimate of their current debt situation is as follows:-

  • CPF available for the resale flat purchase – $420,000 ($11,000 cannot be used as this was from their CPF Special Account allowed for the mortgage repayment on a special ‘hardship’ appeal basis).
  • Compulsory discharge of Mr Lim’s $117,000 bankruptcy creditors’ debts from the EC sale cash proceeds, of about $213,000.
  • Mrs Lim’s debts (excluding employer’s loan, loans from relatives, friends, etc) – $80,000
  • Net EC cash proceeds left after the above –  $16,000.

Therefore, without the $30,000 HDB loan that they have been appealing for, it may almost be impossible for them to buy a resale flat and pay the COV (Note: COVs are hitting a record high again now).

The seller of the resale flat (in Jurong West which the Lims have been told is the cheapest area) for which they have already signed the option to purchase, is sympathetic to their plight, and has agreed orally to given them until the end of this month, to exercise the option.

As they have to vacate their EC at the end of July, what will happen to them, if they cannot get the $30,000 HDB loan?

Change ‘mindset’ towards marriage?

To conclude I would like to refer to an article published on Channel Newsasia where the Acting Minister for Community Development, Youth and Sports called for Singaporeans to change their ‘mindset’ in their attitude towards marriage.(“S’poreans need to change mindset towards marriage: Chan Chun Sing”, Channel NewsAsia, Jun 25)

However, if we take the Lim family as a case in point, all their financial problems may go away if they do not have three children.

So, is it any wonder why Singapore’s marriage rate fell to a record low last year, while the number of divorces has increased, and the procreation rate is at a historical low?


Alex Lew, Lee Mei Wei, Ko Siew Huey and Leong Sze Hian provide free financial counseling every Thursday from 8 – 10 pm., at Block 108, Potong Pasir Ave 1

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

感应通关绩效良好 国人未来或无需用护照通关

移民与关卡局去年进行约半年的试验计划,成功让2万2千名国人以感应的方式通关,因此或可能在樟宜机场第四搭客大厦试行。 人力部长兼内政部第二部长杨莉明表示,移民关卡局在大士关卡透过精良的生物识别科技,设立以感应方式通关,并取得良好成绩。 因此国人或可期待不久后不需使用护照或指纹的情况下轻松通关。 此外,内政科技局也研制了迅速检测冠状病毒的工具,并设置在关卡的生化监控系统中发挥到有效的作用,以此遏制疾病的扩散。

【冠状病毒19】已列安全客工宿舍 却出现新病例

原本已被列为无冠病19的安全客工宿舍,却传出发现新病例!跨部门防疫工作小组呼吁跟单位积极监督宿舍管理,避免引来新一波的疫情感染。 由建设局、经济发展局、人力部和保健促进局昨日(8月11日)联合发出的文告中指出,有原属安全区的客工宿舍出现新疫情,但是并没有更多详细资料。 人力部昨晚的文告称,除了有客工隔离的17栋客工专用大楼,所有宿舍昨日起已正式摆脱冠病,被列为安全宿舍。这意味着,除了在政府隔离设施内进行隔离的2万2500名客工,所有居住在宿舍的可供已康复,或在冠毒检测中呈阴性反应。 文告指出,随着隔离大楼的客工都完成隔离期,Cassia@Penjuru宿舍也成为了安全宿舍。 此外,客工复工在即,在四单位的联合文告中指出,客工宿舍的人流也会增加,因此促请宿舍当局、承包商及工地等单位提高警惕,做足安全防疫措施。 文告中也提到了当局所采用及推出的四个加强防疫措施,即所有客工必须采用人力部指定的手机申报健康状况应用程序、人力部密切跟进客工宿舍医疗站看诊人数、监测具高风险的客工宿舍排水、在高风险区域工作的客工必须定期接受拭子检测,即每两周或14天一次。而曾受到感染并已康复的客工,无需接受180天的常规测试。 当局表示,以作为防疫措施之一,若发现有客工受到感染的症状出现,将会迅速隔离所有的高风险客工,并展开积极的检测行动。 当局要求雇主和总承包商进行商议,必须安排让客工们定期到区域检测中心或宿舍内的检测站,进行拭子检测。对此,保健促进局也启动了拭子检测注册系统(SRS),让雇主们进行预约。

【冠状病毒19】逾万员工尚未接受常规检测

建设局指出,还有1万3000名员工还未获得雇主安排进行冠状病毒19常规检测(RRT),而当局自6月开始已检查了超过2500个工地,发现每十个工地中就有一个仍需加强防疫措施。 在人力部、建设局、经济发展局和保健促进局于9月7日发出的联合文告指出,截止9月6日,有1万3000名员工未获得安排进行常规检测,因此他们在SGWorkPass应用程序中的“通行码”(AccessCode)仍然维持在红色,即无法工作。 四单位自8月分开始就一直和雇主们进行联系,提醒他们在截止日期,9月5日之前为员工进行常规检测,而相关机构也确保咋截止日期前,提供足够的检测次数供预订,并指导和协助面临困难的雇主们进行安排。 至于未接受检测的员工们,当局表示禁止他们的工作通行证,主要是为了保护他们的健康和安全。当局促请雇主迅速为员工们安排检测,可到保健促进局的拭子检测登记系统(Swab Registration System,简称SRS)进行登记。 若有需要,雇主也可以联系相关的部门,即建筑业的致函[email protected]寻求帮助,海洋和加工业者可致函 [email protected],而有关住在客工宿舍的制造业或服务业客工,雇主可联系www.mom.gov.sg/feedback。若雇主在为员工登记拭子检测上遇到困难,可致函[email protected].。 雇主需委托安全管理人员 另一方面,建设局自6月开始已经检查了超过2500个工地,发现每十个工地中就有一个需要加强防疫措施。而为了杜绝工地成为冠病散播温床,雇主必须在工地里委托安全管理人员,确保工地的安全,至今也已有5万人接受和完成有关培训课程。 安全管理人员的工作包括了确保工地内的员工有登记、测体温、为双手消毒、出席每日会议并提醒员工们注意安全。 工地的安全措施包括了划分区域、避免不同区域员工的接触、错开休息时间和地点、设立指示牌和隔板,并且在每日经常接触的部位和地点进行消毒工作。…