The SFD trio: Jarrod Luo (far left), Seelan Palay (second from left)

and Rachel Zeng (second from right)

Singaporeans For Democracy (SFD) members Mr Seelan Palay 27, Mr Jarrod Luo 27 and Miss Rachel Zeng 28 had been released from police investigation according to a press release by SFD Executive Director and SDP Party member Dr James Gomez.

The trio were summoned to appear at the Major Crime Division of the Criminal Investigations Department (CID) at 1130am on 27 January 2011 over the sale of 12 copies of the book Once A Jolly Hangman: Singapore Justice in the Dock at a film screening at the Substation on 14 November 2010.

They were investigated under section 502 of the Penal Code, Chapter 224 under the Criminal Procedure Code 2010 (Act 15 of 2010) which states that “sale of printed or engraved substance containing defamatory matter, knowing it to contain such matter, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to 2 years, or with fine, or with both”.

According to the press release, the trio were informed this week, 5 months after they were first summoned by the police, that the investigations were completed and they were released from it.

The letter says that the investigations have concluded and after much consideration of the facts and circumstances surrounding the sale of the books, the Attorney General decided not to take any further actions against the SFD trio.

The press release further states that although SFD members have been released from the investigations, it still does not resolve the lack of clarity over the classification of the said book.

It ends with a call for  the Media Development Authority to take steps to officially ban Once A Jolly Hangman: Singapore Justice in the Dock, stating that the absence of classification “continues to put members of the public at legal risk.”

Mr Jarrod Luo was one of the Singapore Democratic Party’s candidates contesting Sembawang GRC in the recent General Elections.


Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

NUS graduates ranked 10th most employable worldwide according to Times Higher Education

Graduates of National University Singapore (NUS) are some of the most employable…

“不经意地”只告知病人MRI扫描报价上限 樟宜医院致歉

上月20日,民众林川宝(译音)投书《海峡时报论坛》抱怨,自己在樟宜综合医院光是照个核磁共振成像(MRI),价格就比起私人诊所的收费更高,差距两倍以上。 林川宝是在上月16日到樟宜综合医院骨科接受检查。医生则怀疑他患有严重的肩旋转肌撕裂(rotator cuff tear),便提议要做MRI检查。 为了能够治疗肩膀疼痛,早前他也在樟宜医院预约3月下旬才做检查,收费为1千450元;但他较后决定先到私人诊所进行MRI检查,却发现含税竟仅需600元。这令前者对樟宜医院的收费更高,感到困惑。 对此,樟宜综合医院首席财务官林丽娜(Lim Lee Nor)则在前日(2019年12月31日),在《海时》回应林川宝先生的质问。 “扫描价格取决于多种因素” 林丽娜证实该院医生建议林川宝进行MRI扫描以进行更好的诊断,“特定扫描的价格,取决于多种因素,例如病情复杂程度、临床方案、使用的机器类型、扫描图像质量和使用时间等。” 林丽娜指该院的收费和其他公立和私人医院“相当”,并指该院的做法是把价格范围报价给病人。 但她指出,在林川宝的个案上,当他们和后者沟通时,却“不经意地”(inadvertently)只告知对方预估价格的上限。…

Why Singapore is Superior Despite So Many Faults

From Strategy Page An article recently appeared in a professional journal (Armed…

Shanmugam’s “No, No” is a test of our political will

by Tan Wah Piow Why did the meeting on the 30th August…