by: Dana Lam, Potong Pasir Voter/

Etched in my memory is an image of a lone and visibly worn Mr Chiam See Tong submitting to a yawn in a corner of a counting centre at the end of polling day under the headline, Loneliness in Defeat (ST 12 February 1979). The stillness in photographer Yow Yun Woh’s snapshot of the independent candidate for Potong Pasir in an unguarded moment in 1979 drives home for me the full fathom of Mr Chiam’s endeavour, and that of other individuals like him.

The inspiration to take on the ruling party’s well-entrenched monopoly of parliament, not to mention, the Singaporean imagination could not have been lightly made! The uneven terrain aside, Opposition candidates are wont to encounter the full ruling party artillery and Mr Chiam was taking it on alone.

Commitment, resilience and a thick hide are pre-requisites of Opposition politicians more so than ruling party members.

What drives the individuals? According to ruling party rhetoric: lunacy, idiocy, private ambition and agenda. Well, we know it’s often a fine line between lunacy and true genius.

Opposition candidates here know very well the taste, the smell, the feel and meaning of defeat, disappointment and sacrifice. They also know humiliation, injustice and fear. History is replete with examples. Some have suffered more gravely than others. Mr Chiam has had it lighter than some. Before he had his “O” level results broadcast in the national press, he was branded part of a merry band of “clowns, jesters, fools and crooks”, “nuts without bolts” and “a third rate lawyer”.

That slur on his professional competence during the rallies of December 1980 amounted to defamation. He is the first and only opposition candidate to date to have received public apologies from his PAP opponents and a $7,000 out of court settlement (Business Times, 13 February and 28 February 1981).

They say that history is written by victors. Mr Chiam’s success in 1984, his longevity in Parliament together with Mr Low Thia Kiang and most recently, Ms Sylvia Lim and Messrs Chen Show Mao, Faisal Abdul Manap, Pritam Singh and Yaw Shin Leong will remain symbolic of the ‘true genius’ in Singaporeans: The parts in us capable of individual reason, dignity, humanity and action in spite of ourselves.

The greater of Mr Chiam’s contribution and that of his colleagues in the opposition will continue to be in the inspiration they set in standing up and speaking out. However, knowledge and its power is cumulative and the history of our people must necessarily encompass all those who have risked and lost and paid the price for their conviction and endeavour to give us voice.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

民众没去广州却收到12封电邮通知! 酷航摆乌龙致歉

由于从新加坡赴中国的航班,因为防疫需要一些手续有变,为此新加坡酷航也发电邮通知乘客。不料即使非乘客、近期也没有任何出国行程的民众,也不明不白收到信息,令人丈八金刚摸不着头脑。 原本上述来自酷航的通知,是电邮给即将在来临周日(8月30日),出发前往广州的航班乘客,解释中国当局在防疫上的一些变动,包括登记五天前需出示核酸检测阴性证明等。 不过,即便没有任何出国行程的网民Enzo Enyo Ang,也接连收到多达12封来自酷航的电邮,令他莫名其妙,“我知道大家都很担心冠病疫情,但酷航你也不用一连发12道电邮给我吧?再者我也没打算出门,更何况是广州。” 新加坡知名网红新加坡李健敏,不忘调侃:“看来有些人需要好好跟老婆大人解释,为何他们来临周日要去一趟广州?” 据了解,酷航已在脸书发文致歉,表示上述通知原本是发给本月30日TR100航班的乘客,却误传给其他根本没有出行的用户。酷航仍在调查事件,初步所知并未发生数据或个资遭骇或泄露的问题。

Grab to disallow passengers to sit in the front as part of enhanced precautionary measures

Aiming to reduce the risks of COVID-19 transmission on its transport services,…

范国瀚被判藐视法庭罪

社运份子范国瀚和民主党党要陈两裕,于今日在高等法庭,被法官宣判藐视法庭罪成立。 高庭法官Woo Bih Li指出,范国瀚和陈两裕两人,在脸书上的贴文攻击了司法机构的诚信和公正,存在引起公众对司法正义信心动摇的风险。 范国瀚随后也在脸书证实此事,并在帖文中表示,此案将安排另一单独听证会。 范国瀚在今年4月,于脸书的贴文称,“马来西亚法庭处理政治个案比新加坡司法更独立”,而被总检察署指控藐视法庭。有关贴文也转载新闻:“《当今大马》挑战反假新闻法违宪”。 随后,新加坡民主党党要陈两裕于5月6日,在脸书为范国瀚抱不平,指出总检察署的举措,更加证实范国瀚的批评所言不虚。结果也同样被控藐视法庭罪。 2016年司法(保护)法令自去年10月生效,上述两人也“抢了头香”,成为该法令生效以来首两位被指控藐视法庭的个案。被判藐视法庭罪者,可悲罚款高达10万新元,或监禁3年,或两者兼施。 早前,在今年7月的审讯中,高级政府律师Francis Ng指责,范国瀚的言论,乃是向公众影射,在马国进行挑战宪法, 如发生在新加坡则必然败诉,因为本国缺乏司法独立。 至于范和陈的辩护律师Eugene…

Temporarily lift on car loans restriction for second hand cars

By Terry Xu Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has announced that the…