by: Liew Kai Khiun/

This article first appeared HERE during the General Election 2011 period. We want to thank Liew Kai Khiun for giving us permission to republish an edited version of the article on TOC.


Although I have spent most of the 38 years of my life around the area, I moved formally into the Potong Pasir Constituency eleven years ago, and have voted for Mr Chiam See Tong for the General Elections in 2001 and 2006. Having watched his rallies on the same empty field near Potong Pasir MRT Station since a kid in the 1980s, to me, Mr Chiam is very much part of my life as much as the Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew.

Like a vulnerably flicking candle, Mr Chiam’s precarious political presence has been felt for much of my formative and adult years, seeing me through graduation, getting my first job, postgraduate studies, marriage and finally getting a public housing (HDB) apartment in Potong Pasir estate itself. During this time he and his constituents have faced the might of the People’s Action Party (PAP) machinery.

In front of national television, this meek looking lawyer has been ridiculed and humiliated by the sea of white shirts across him. Perhaps the one image that I will always remember is the huge burst of mocking laughter from the PAP ministers and backbenchers at one of his speeches somewhere in the 1980s. This is the face of the blunt arrogance and disregard of the elitist PAP government.

It is therefore not surprising to find a teenage daughter of one of their ex-MP, pouring scorn on the unemployed, telling them that “life will kick you hard in the balls”, and “get out of my elite uncaring face.” I do not know why this MP was dropped and his daughter counseled when they are merely reflecting the privileged social positions that the system has been responsible in reinforcing.

Nonetheless, both Mr Chiam and his voters have been kicked around for a very long time, but he, and they, have refused to leave every General Elections since 1984. Against the shrinking circle of over-ordained national leaders and parliamentarians of the PAP, to me at least Mr Chiam represents the under-ordained common man who feels his right to speak out as a human being even though he does not possess what is constituted as the right type socio-educational pedigree.

While I may have openly disagreed with Mr Chiam on the issue of leadership and succession particularly with regards to his appointment of his wife, Mrs Lina Chiam to replace him when he left to fight in Toa-Payoh Bishan Group Representation Constituency, I acknowledge his contributions and also accept his decision.

When Mr Chiam made his ”walk” to his Town Council office from the rally site on the night of 4 May 2011, residents and supporters poured enthusiastically to the streets to accompany him in this short, but arduous journey from a man recovering from a stroke. In a country where its citizens are often instructed, “incentivized”, herded and bused into participating in highly scripted and contrived state sponsored events, this spontaneity is exceptional and should be treasured.

However much I respect the elected representative from PAP in the area, I am not confident that he would be willing and able to treasure such sentiments that Mr Chiam has fostered in his ward.

Mr Chiam See Tong has given my home a history, a heritage and a memory, one that the increasingly de-historicized and de-personalized PAP do not seem to possess.

Thank you very much for struggling against all odds for the past three decades Mr Chiam. You have given an entire generation of ordinary people like me a sense of dignity and pride as residents of Potong Pasir, as Singaporeans, and as human beings in Singapore Inc.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

陈佩玲称四财案人均受惠逾两万元? 革新党肯尼斯吁援引假消息法要求更正

日前,在参与“坚毅向前”附加预算案辩论时,麦波申国会议员陈佩玲提到,政府四次拨款助国人和企业面对困难,粗略计算,政府针对疫情的平均个人援助大约为2万3千225新元。 此番言论立时引来网民非议,有者指出,百姓们实得在手上、看得到的现金或受惠数目,根本没有那么多,更质疑陈佩玲的数据哪里来? 陈佩玲较后则发文解释,自己是依据四个总值近930亿元的预算案,与人口相除,人均可受惠逾两万元,以此与其他国家国民的人均受惠程度作比较,也显示政府为应对此次疫情的决心。 不过,也是经济学家的革新党领袖肯尼斯(Kenneth Jeyaretnam),就质问应探讨930亿元的分配,公民直接收到的现金也只有600元的关怀与援助配套补贴。甚至为此要副总理兼财政部长王瑞杰,援引防假消息法,向陈佩玲发出更正通知! 再者,早前王瑞杰称为应对冠病不可预测情况,政府拨出额外130亿元作为应急基金。这可能包括在340亿元团结预算案的特别调拨款项(special transfers)。 此外,要衡量政府的直接援助,也可看总赤字743亿元中,减去约173亿元的留本基金(endowment fund)及信托基金(trust fund),以及130亿元的应急基金。

惊传柔佛州苏丹“驾崩”? 柔摄政王与父王合照打脸假消息

日前,有消息柔佛州苏丹易卜拉欣陛下因癌症驾崩,导致网路疯传,柔佛州摄政王东姑依斯迈则贴上与父王的合照辟谣。 据《东方日报》报道,一名名为“Hazwan Ali”的网友昨日在面子书上载一则贴文,称柔佛州苏丹因罹患脑癌与肾癌不治,还贴上救护车的合成图,甚至将柔佛王室惯用的水印贴上,试图以假乱真,引起网民疯传。 该名网友还在帖文下方回复网民留言,让帖文看起来更贴合事实。 对此,柔州摄政王东姑依斯迈昨日傍晚7时06分罕见在官方面子书上,发布一张与陛下的合照,但却未附上任何文字说明,以此无声回应“死讯”,粉碎谣言。 照片中,可见依布拉欣陛下正在玩手机,并未直视镜头,但看起来身体健康良好。 截至今日官方帖文已获4万6000名网民点赞,1700留言,柔州网民也在底下纷纷表示安心,并祝愿陛下身体健康,更有部分网民批评造谣者,要求当局严惩。 目前,该名发假消息的网友已关闭脸书,而马来西亚警方也证实接获四宗相关投报,同时也会立案侦查假消息来源。

5 Minutes With… Leong Sze Hian on NTUC discounts

TOC spends 5 minutes with Leong Sze Hian discussing the NTUC’s U-Stretch vouchers for poorer Singaporeans.

马国首相不赞同调高退休年龄

据马来西亚媒体报导,马国职工总会(MTUC)日前曾建议当地政府仿效新加坡的政策,把马国退休年龄延长至65岁。 不过,马国首相马哈迪在两日前已回应,没有必要上调退休年龄,理由是避免限制年轻一代就业机会。 “如果设定在强制65岁退休,他们越迟退休,其他人(更年轻、有资历和技术)就越难升迁。” 不过马哈迪自己也不是94岁还在工作吗?对此他指出,不能拿他来作比较,他称自己原本就已是退休之人,只不过“被召回来工作”。 他解释,在他第一次任相期间(1981-2003年),就已经从55岁提高至56岁。而他的续任者再调高至60岁退休。 他指出,一些国家没有限制强制退休年龄,可以工作到任何时候,反而限制年轻人的机会。 至于我国总理李显龙日前在2019年国庆群众大会上宣布,政府将在2021年迈出第一步,在未来十年逐步把退休年龄和重新雇佣年龄,分别调高至65岁和70岁。 他在致词时提及,去年,人力部设立了年长雇员劳资政工作小组,而上月他和小组成员一起吃午餐,即便午餐期间也能感受到组员激烈讨论,特别是雇主、年长雇员都有个资考量,年长员工希望确认能受聘更久,但雇主们担心营运成本及经济前景,希望政策有更大的灵活性。