photo by Shawn Danker

Irene Shen/

Housing prices, healthcare costs and foreign labour policies dominate the Post Election Transformation Talk organized by The Online Citizen on 11 June. Its aim was to gather Singaporeans to talk about the transformations that were most desired.. The 3 hour talk, of which half was devoted to a Question-and-answer session, featured two guest speakers – The Online Ctizen’s Mr Leong Sze Hian and former principal private secretary to then-Deputy Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong, Mr Tan Jee Say.

Cost of Living

On housing, Mr. Leong mentioned that Singapore is the only country in the world that inflates the price of public housing, and then gives housing grants that never seem to match price increases, and then claims this is  helping people to own homes. He added that flat prices rose 66 per cent or 11.1 per cent per annum over the last five years or so, whereas housing grant increases were about a few thousand dollars a year for most eligible buyers. He also raised that Singapore public housing supply policy caters almost entirely to first-timer families and forsakes other groups such as second-timers, divorcees, single mothers, singles, and down-graders who may need to do so because of financial stress. According to him, 95 per cent of Build-to-Order (BTO) flats are reserved for first-timers and an unknown percentage are reserved for grassroots volunteers.

With regards to healthcare, Mr Leong said that the current public spending on healthcare is approximately 2 per cent of GDP, one of the lowest in the world. Instead of transferring $76 million of Medifund surpluses to the Protected Reserves (https://www.theonlinecitizen.com/2011/04/helping-the-poor-too-much-money/), he suggested that Medifund can be used for the needy who cannot afford polyclinic out-patient treatment. He also suggested that the criteria for approving Medifund applications and Standard Drug List should be made public. He remarked that the last disclosed 99 per cent rejection rate in Parliament, for down-grading applications may be forcing more Singaporeans to choose lower class subsidized hospital wards.

Foreign Workforce

Mr Tan Jee Say, who is now with the Singapore Democratic Party,  touched on four areas of foreign workforce – economic, financial, social and political. He explained that Singapore’s economic growth, conventionally measured as GDP, is determined by labour supply and productivity. Mr Tan also observed that the immigration policy was one of the main factors for the vote swing against the PAP in the recent General Elections. From a political perspective, while the incumbent may benefit from a huge number of new citizens who may have voted out of gratitude, the advantage would only last for one elections as the new citizens would soon encounter the same problems that Singaporeans face.

Yardsticks

Mr. Tan said that setting a minimum wage would not affect Singapore’s competitive position as Singapore has in fact fallen behind in world competitiveness ranking behind Hong Kong and the United States, which implement minimum wage. To transform this, he suggests that the CPF Equalisation Levy should be implemented on foreign workers to balance the cost of hiring foreign workers and Singaporeans. This would allow Singaporeans to compete with foreigners on an equal platform. Additionally, ministerial pay should not be linked to  GDP growth and CEO salaries.

Transform, Tweak or Counter-Transform?

On the PAP’s pledge to transform itself, Mr Tan felt that the most important ingredient is sincerity. “Sincerity comes from the heart and it is non-calculative, tweaking doesn’t mean transformation,” he said. He also noted that the PAP’s desire to tranform wasn’t new.

In GE 1984, when the opposition politicians secured an elected seat in parliament and PAP’s share of votes went below 70 per cent for the first time, there were calls for the party to listen to Singaporeans.

Mr Tan further questioned PAP’s DNA on transformation with an extract from Page 45 of Hard Truths:

“Any credible opposition would not be able to come up with a truly alternative platform because if it were made up of smart people who want to do what is best for Singapore, it would arrive at similar conclusions to that of the PAP’s.”

Q & A

Responding to a question why Singapore did not continue to adopt prefabrication HDB flats which significantly reduce the amount of manual labour. Mr Tan, who was in the Public Housing Committee in 1981, thought that prefabrication was the answer when they identified that there was a shortage of flats and had to build 150,000 flats by the next election in 1984. Mr Tan futher explained that prefabrication flats require a minimum volume and also land to store.

On the foreign labor policy, a member of the audience felt that the crux of the problem lies with policies which allow corporations to squeeze employees to the fullest rather than the liberal immigration policy itself.

Mr Leong answered that we cannot have a policy where you define everyone as foreign talent. “If you bring in people at the top with skills, high pay – that’s foreign talent,” he said. Mr. Leong added that the job category that Singaporeans do not want such as cleaning or general workers has the third highest unemployment rate according to the latest statistics. “What we need is an equal opportunity employment commission,” said Mr Leong. Mr. Tan added that it is not easy to fire or dismiss someone in western countries, but when western companies come to Singapore, it is easier to do this under the Employment Act, where companies can give 1 to 3 months notice (contractually) to employees.

One lady asked why drive away foreign investors (job creators) by raising the threshold to be Singapore citizens and instead, give jobs away to foreign talent/worker. Mr. Leong commented that instead of encouraging the kind of people that we want to come to Singapore, we increase the S pass to $2,000, and employment pass from $2,500 to $2,800, so foreigners have a minimum wage, but Singaporeans don’t. “The real way is actually equalize the wage cost of foreigners and Singaporeans as I recommended,” added Mr. Tan.

Another member of the audience who is in the retail business felt that one overlooked factor was high rental costs for businesses. In response, Mr Tan explained due to high rental, stores have to open long hours to justify the high rental and thus, have to hire foreign workers who are willing to work long hours.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【武汉冠状病毒】24日新增一病例 为75岁妇女、与基督生命堂有关

根据新加坡卫生部文告,截至本月24日,本地新增一起确诊病例,是75岁的本地妇女,相信与基督生命堂有关联。 本地累计确诊病例90例,惟53例病患已治愈出院,其余37名留院病患大多情况稳定或有起色。然而,有七名病患情况严峻,需待在加护病房。 第90起病例近期未到过中国,她是在本月9日出现症状,并到诊所求医。17日和周日(23日)前往同样诊所,并被送往陈笃生医院接受隔离。她是在23日中午确诊。在住院前,她大都呆在碧山12街的住家。 另一方面,卫生部证实此前的第89病例(41岁永久居民),是菲律宾公民。他是在22日早上确诊。 菲律宾驻新加坡大使馆是在今日证实,一名菲律宾人在新加坡确诊感染武汉冠状病毒,这也是本地首起有菲律宾人确诊感染的病例。 由于他曾前往碧山民众俱乐部健身房Gymmboxx,该俱乐部接到卫生部通知后,便立即关闭并进行消毒。 他上一次到该健身房是在本月6日。入院前也曾前往Affinity Equity Partners公司上班,并待在实龙岗8道的住处。 截至目前,菲律宾已有130人正接受感染检测,但该国确诊病例仅3例,均为中国公民,其中1人已死亡。  

民主党林文兴劝《海峡时报》 想与人民连结,须停止当政府传声筒

民主党林文兴表示,若《海峡时报》真的想要持续和人民连结,必须停止作为政府的传声筒。 上述言论是针对《海峡时报》的一篇报道,新加坡2020年大选:年轻选民对选举结果发挥至关重要的效应(Singapore GE2020: Signs of young voters’ crucial role in election outcome)作出的回应。…

Mothership.sg accedes to MDA's request to be registered

In a statement on Thursday, the Media Development Authority (MDA) said it…

马国上议院正式通过 废除《2018反假新闻法令》

马来西亚正式通过,废除《2018年反假新闻法令》。该法是在该国前朝政府执政时期,在前首相纳吉领导下推行。 该国首相署部长哈尼巴前日在马国上议院总结时批评,上述法令是国阵时期的恶法,旨在打压新闻自由。 国阵前朝政府是在去年4月3日,在509大选前一个月,匆匆通过《2018年反假新闻法令》。 该国希盟政府在去年执政后,有意废除该法。尽管去年8月16日,已在国会下议院三读通过废除提案,不过在9月12日,被上议院以28对21票驳回。 至于马来西亚为何要废除《反假新闻法令》,要回到去年希盟政府开始执政后,声称现有法律已足够应对假消息传播的问题,例如1998年通讯与多媒体法等。 马国首相马哈迪曾表示,如果制定法律限制人们表达意见,恐怕亦可能遭政府滥用。 新马领导遭记者质问假消息法议题 回溯今年4月,新加坡总理李显龙出席在马国举行的第九届新马领导人非正式会议。两国领导人在记者会上,同时被记者质问对于防假消息法的立场。 当时李显龙表示,网络假消息都是多国面对的严重问题,不止新加坡,德国、法国和澳洲都有立法对付,连英国也考虑透过司法管制网络假消息。 他解释,新加坡立法前有经过漫长的过程,成立特选委会听证和咨询,希望能在国会通过。 “对于无国界记者的批评我不感意外,他也对我国的媒体管制诸多意见,但我们的目的,是落实能在新加坡可行的方针。” “限制言论法恐遭滥用”…