Howard Lee/

Speculations are that the Presidential elections will be in August. Already, candidates-to-be are beginning to stake their claims and game plan, and the usual scrutiny of credentials has begun.

Much has been said about whether the Presidency should or should not be supported by the ruling People’s Action Party. Some have cast doubts as to whether Tan Cheng Bock or George Yeo, if he makes the decision to contest, are suitable for the role given their past affiliations with the PAP.

It is clear that the President should not at any point feel beholden to the PAP, given his or her primary role to act as a check and balance to the government. I say primary, since with the recent General Elections, the Singapore electorate has arguably awaken and there is an increasing desire from the ground for such a role to be felt, inside or out of Parliament.

In addition, former Senior Minister S Jayakumar has publicly warned candidates-to-be to be mindful of the limitations on the President’s powers as determined by the Constitution. I respectfully disagree, and in the light of the recent general elections, and for the fact that Jayakumar is no longer part of the Singapore governance structure, his views should never be entertained. It is clear from the general elections that the people are looking for change and will not be afraid to stake their choice of office holders based on their promises. The Presidential elections should not be the exception.

President hopefuls should be given the chance to kill sacred cows as well, so long as it benefits Singapore and Singaporeans. If the next elected President promise positive change, including to the President’s roles and responsibilities, and succeed in doing so, or have tried in vain, let that be for the people to judge  at the end of his or her term.

For if a candidate wishes to win over this electorate and take up the pivotal role as President, PAP support (or the lack of it) is irrelevant, so long as he or she can demonstrate sufficient independence from the ruling party. In our current political climate, independent thought defines you as a person, not as part of an entity, and aligns you closer to the people you are seeking votes from.

If you wish to be elected by the people, them you must answer to the people. Let that be your promise come the Presidential elections, and let that be the scorecard of your tenure, before we decide to vote you in or out, or petition to have you removed before that is due.

So the following is a wish list, partly mine, partly from some in TOC, but in true democratic style, open to you, as citizens, to add, subtract or recast. May it be a signpost for our President wannabe, as an indicator of the people’s wishes.

Of the OTC legacy

Ong Teng Chong remains one of my most trusted public figures. As a former heavyweight of a political party, my instant reaction would ordinarily be to double doubt his candidacy. But despite a narrow win that would even have solicited derision from many weaker PAP candidate in the recent general elections, his follow-up actions has spoken volumes to the contrary. Ong had done his level best to hold the ruling party accountable for what goes into and out of the reserves. His immortal words, “If you ask me to protect the reserves, then you’ve got to tell me what I’m supposed to protect”, should be the benchmark for any President hopeful. It has nothing to do with authority, but everything to do with duty to the people. The way forward for the next President should be towards the full disclosure of the people’s money and for the complete accountability of our sovereign wealth funds.

Of ceremony and causes

It is not uncommon to see our Presidents grace occasions, anything from official openings to charitable events. But what exactly are their inclinations towards charities? Sure, there is an “all and sundry” scope for the highest office holder, but even as Tan Kin Lian vouches to donate part of his Presidential salary to fund a new charity for needy students and seniors, how genuine is the act of giving? What are the passions, the specific causes that the next President champions? It is fine to say “half my pay will go towards charity”, but is it a formality, a lip service, or is he or she genuinely interested and participating in the people’s causes?

Of top positions and value-adding

Many heads of states will not fail to pay their dues to the President, although technically, our head of government is the Prime Minister. If these visits are limited as mere formalities, then we are indeed over-paying our President. What could be the possible expansion of this role for it to be meaningful to the citizens? Perhaps candidates need to show citizens what they plan to do to complement the role of the Prime Minister is this aspect. A good start will be the examination of the President’s role as the head of the civil service. This could be a tenable first step towards a clearer separation of the government from party politics.

Of justice and mercy

Following the time of Wee Kim Wee, the role of the President to commute death sentences has significantly diminished. S R Nathan, in effect, had zero to his record. Perhaps there were no justifiable death row cases on which the newer Presidents could have made a clear ‘no’ decision, but if lives are at stake, perhaps it is time for his role to be formalised to take on a ‘maybe’ quotient. A President who willingly fights for an expansion of this role, say, for all cases to be presented to him for deliberation, no matter the Judiciary’s verdict, would demonstrate a concern for the sanctity of life and for the people. The President might be very useful as the voice of reason and compassion, when our laws become too rigid for our own good, and maybe set the tone for reform and progress.

As we move into a new era of political awareness in the electorate, so too must the role of the President evolve. We need to demand that Presidential hopefuls go beyond telling us they are qualified, but their plans for taking Singapore forward.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

转移阵地!TikTok母公司拟到我国扩张业务

TikTok所属公司,北京字节跳动公司(Bytedance),正计划将新加坡作为亚洲区的抢滩首地,借此扩张业务。 据路透社报导,有消息人士称因美国总统特朗普政府的压力,TikTok被迫出售其在美国的业务。因此正寻找有潜力的国家,斥资数十亿元,为当地开近百的工作职缺。 北京字节跳动科技公司,目前是全球最具价值的初创企业(Startup),在遭遇印度、英国和美国的打击后,正推进其业务到亚洲各地。 创办人张一鸣,长期以来关注拥有6.5亿人口的东南亚,而许多跨国企业,如阿里巴巴集团控股和腾讯控股也进军东南亚。消息人士称,北京字节跳动科技公司的计划,包括在我国建立数据中心。 旗下业务包括如今火遍全球的TikTok和Lark科技。北京字节跳动在中国的业务也包括中国版TikTok抖音,以及新运营的新闻应用程式 《今日头条》,预计每月将会有15亿活跃用户。 据了解,北京字节跳动科技公司2019年的收入已超越170亿美元,并创造了逾30亿美元(约41亿元)的净利润。 而亚洲如今也是该公司锁定的目标,尤其在被迫售出美国的业务后。美国总统特朗普于昨日(10日)表示,将不会延长交易期限至15日。 除了美国的打压,印度也曾为TikTok用户最多的国家之一,但由于中印边境冲突恶化,印度政府忧心安心问题,从而禁止印度使用TikTok。 软银集团也为印度业务寻找竞购者;英国政府则对TikTok的信息安全存疑,因而禁止TikTok入驻英国。 如今北京字节跳动已组成财团向金融管理局申请数码银行执照。其中成员包括华侨银行的李氏家族。

BCA orders Rivervale Mall to repair wall after photos of building defect circulated online

The owners of Rivervale Mall in Sengkang have been asked to hire…

S Pass increased 12.5% last 6 months

By Leong Sze Hian – I refer to the articles “S'pore on…

Former RP chairman refutes Kenneth Jeyaretnam’s claims

Mr Ng Teck Siong, former Chairman of the Reform Party, intends to…