Howard Lee/

Speculations are that the Presidential elections will be in August. Already, candidates-to-be are beginning to stake their claims and game plan, and the usual scrutiny of credentials has begun.

Much has been said about whether the Presidency should or should not be supported by the ruling People’s Action Party. Some have cast doubts as to whether Tan Cheng Bock or George Yeo, if he makes the decision to contest, are suitable for the role given their past affiliations with the PAP.

It is clear that the President should not at any point feel beholden to the PAP, given his or her primary role to act as a check and balance to the government. I say primary, since with the recent General Elections, the Singapore electorate has arguably awaken and there is an increasing desire from the ground for such a role to be felt, inside or out of Parliament.

In addition, former Senior Minister S Jayakumar has publicly warned candidates-to-be to be mindful of the limitations on the President’s powers as determined by the Constitution. I respectfully disagree, and in the light of the recent general elections, and for the fact that Jayakumar is no longer part of the Singapore governance structure, his views should never be entertained. It is clear from the general elections that the people are looking for change and will not be afraid to stake their choice of office holders based on their promises. The Presidential elections should not be the exception.

President hopefuls should be given the chance to kill sacred cows as well, so long as it benefits Singapore and Singaporeans. If the next elected President promise positive change, including to the President’s roles and responsibilities, and succeed in doing so, or have tried in vain, let that be for the people to judge  at the end of his or her term.

For if a candidate wishes to win over this electorate and take up the pivotal role as President, PAP support (or the lack of it) is irrelevant, so long as he or she can demonstrate sufficient independence from the ruling party. In our current political climate, independent thought defines you as a person, not as part of an entity, and aligns you closer to the people you are seeking votes from.

If you wish to be elected by the people, them you must answer to the people. Let that be your promise come the Presidential elections, and let that be the scorecard of your tenure, before we decide to vote you in or out, or petition to have you removed before that is due.

So the following is a wish list, partly mine, partly from some in TOC, but in true democratic style, open to you, as citizens, to add, subtract or recast. May it be a signpost for our President wannabe, as an indicator of the people’s wishes.

Of the OTC legacy

Ong Teng Chong remains one of my most trusted public figures. As a former heavyweight of a political party, my instant reaction would ordinarily be to double doubt his candidacy. But despite a narrow win that would even have solicited derision from many weaker PAP candidate in the recent general elections, his follow-up actions has spoken volumes to the contrary. Ong had done his level best to hold the ruling party accountable for what goes into and out of the reserves. His immortal words, “If you ask me to protect the reserves, then you’ve got to tell me what I’m supposed to protect”, should be the benchmark for any President hopeful. It has nothing to do with authority, but everything to do with duty to the people. The way forward for the next President should be towards the full disclosure of the people’s money and for the complete accountability of our sovereign wealth funds.

Of ceremony and causes

It is not uncommon to see our Presidents grace occasions, anything from official openings to charitable events. But what exactly are their inclinations towards charities? Sure, there is an “all and sundry” scope for the highest office holder, but even as Tan Kin Lian vouches to donate part of his Presidential salary to fund a new charity for needy students and seniors, how genuine is the act of giving? What are the passions, the specific causes that the next President champions? It is fine to say “half my pay will go towards charity”, but is it a formality, a lip service, or is he or she genuinely interested and participating in the people’s causes?

Of top positions and value-adding

Many heads of states will not fail to pay their dues to the President, although technically, our head of government is the Prime Minister. If these visits are limited as mere formalities, then we are indeed over-paying our President. What could be the possible expansion of this role for it to be meaningful to the citizens? Perhaps candidates need to show citizens what they plan to do to complement the role of the Prime Minister is this aspect. A good start will be the examination of the President’s role as the head of the civil service. This could be a tenable first step towards a clearer separation of the government from party politics.

Of justice and mercy

Following the time of Wee Kim Wee, the role of the President to commute death sentences has significantly diminished. S R Nathan, in effect, had zero to his record. Perhaps there were no justifiable death row cases on which the newer Presidents could have made a clear ‘no’ decision, but if lives are at stake, perhaps it is time for his role to be formalised to take on a ‘maybe’ quotient. A President who willingly fights for an expansion of this role, say, for all cases to be presented to him for deliberation, no matter the Judiciary’s verdict, would demonstrate a concern for the sanctity of life and for the people. The President might be very useful as the voice of reason and compassion, when our laws become too rigid for our own good, and maybe set the tone for reform and progress.

As we move into a new era of political awareness in the electorate, so too must the role of the President evolve. We need to demand that Presidential hopefuls go beyond telling us they are qualified, but their plans for taking Singapore forward.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Woman shares heartbreaking experience of dealing with angry customers after delivery driver husband dies from over-exhaustion

Sharing a heart-breaking story of her how her husband died, who was…

漏删一条撑港评论,中国网络评论审核员遭开除

中国当局多年来以“防火长城”(Great Firewall)过滤中国网民在网路上看到的内容,并审查民众的留言。 近日,关注中国宗教自由以及人权的杂志《寒冬》则接到负责审核网络评论信息的员工爆料,其同事因未能及时拦截一条网民支持香港民主运动的评论而被开除,而该公司也因为“监管”不当而被罚款5000人民币。 他还向《寒冬》透露,比如说六四、台独、港独、疆独以及与毛泽东、习近平的相关内容,都被列为管控范围,只要出现相关评论就会立即被删除。“国家管控着你说的每句话、做的每件事,只要手机连着网络,一说到敏感词就会被监控。” 该爆料员工表示,若是有人说道异议言论,不是被屏蔽就是遭到警告,严重的还会有网警采取相应措施监控或抓捕。 “在网上你只能说中共的好,不能说他们不好”,该员工表示。 此外,报道还指出,部分大陆网友因在社交媒体或微博上发表撑港言论,很快地被当地公安盯上,并传唤至派出所,要求写下保证书,甚至还以“寻衅滋事罪”被拘留。在获释后,警方更将他们列为重点监控对象,经常电话盘问行踪,并向该工作单位施压,将其开除。 报道续指,中国当局亦限制民众前往香港或台湾等“敏感”地区,其中公职人员遭到严苛的管控,凡持有公民普通护照、往来台湾通行证、往来港澳通行证者必须统统上缴,违者将受到严重的处分。  

We are a little red dot and so must be extraordinary – PM Lee

the following is a brief report of Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’a…

Tokyo Olympics 'difficult' if pandemic not contained: Abe

Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe said on Wednesday it would be “difficult”…