Leong Sze Hian/

Former Health Minister and current Minister for National Development Khaw Boon Wan

 

I refer to the ST reports “PAP appoints Khaw Boon Wan as Party Chairman” (ST, Jun 2) and “Gan to focus on three key health areas” (ST, May 31).

3 Key Areas

With reference to the three key health areas of infrastructure, cost and ageing policies cited by the new Health Minister, I would like to make the following remarks: –

 

“On the first issue, the Health Minister (Gan Kim Yong) said it was necessary to take stock of demographic trends adding “we will need to plan ahead not only in terms of physical capacity but also in terms of human resource development, to ensure sufficient supply of healthcare professionals and workers”.

Is the new Minister saying that his predecessor did not plan at all, since the increase in the total number of hospital beds was zero over the last 10 years or so, and that this is vis-à-vis a one million increase in the population and also promoting the increase in medical tourists to 850,000?

As to “human resource development”, when I went to a polyclinic and hospital recently, the receptionist, nurse, X-ray technician and doctor, were all foreigners, and I had some difficulty understanding their accent. I have heard that some non- English speaking Singaporeans have had some difficulty communicating with foreign healthcare professionals.

Since the former Health Minister did not tell us, can the new Minister tell us the proportion and breakdown of healthcare professionals like doctors, nurses, etc., who are non-Singaporeans?

I understand that the national Medical School is acutely short of funding because of insufficient financial support from the Government.

Would the Minister like to comment on this?

Depleted Medisave Accounts

“The problem is especially real for retirees with limited cash savings and middle- income families with elderly parents and sick children to look after”.

Can the Minister tell us how many Singaporeans age 60 and above, have nothing or less than $1,000 in their Medisave Account?

How many do not have any form of medical insurance?

How many children who are sick or without an adverse health history, are not covered by any medical insurance, like Medishield?

In this regard, I understand that Singapore is probably the only country in the world that excludes children’s congenital conditions from the national health insurance scheme (Medishield in the case of Singapore).

Passing the Baton

Mr. Khaw wrote about “unfinished business” in his last blog entry as Health Minister and paying tribute to Mr. Khaw, Mr Gan said: “My first impression is that Minister Khaw has done a great job to improve the health-care framework … The quality of healthcare in Singapore is something we can all be proud of”.

Current Health Minister Gan Kim Yong

This in my view, may go down in the annals of healthcare history as perhaps the greatest understatement by a Minister when we look back in the future on the so called “transformation” in our history – something which we may really be very proud of if and when the Health Minister fixes all the problems that he has inherited.

Healthcare Outcomes

The former Health Minister’s consistent rhetoric has been that our 3Ms (Medisave, Medishield, Medifund) system is affordable, efficient and admired by other countries. What has this left us with, in terms of outcomes for healthcare?

• About 21 per cent of Singaporeans who sought financial counselling from Credit Counselling Singapore had to do so due to medical costs;

• The zero increase in total hospital beds over the last decade in relation to the surge in population;

• A 99 per cent unsuccessful rate (or 1% success rate) for patients’ applications to downgrade to lower classes of hospital rooms;

• The last available disclosed statistic from the Chairperson of the Government Parliamentary Committee (GPC) on Health was that 750,000 people had no form of medical insurance;

• Public healthcare spending is only about two per cent of GDP, which is one of the lowest, if not the lowest in the world;

• Public hospitals’ average hospitalisation bills have increased by as much as double over the last four years;

• $86 million of Medifund surpluses were transferred to the protected reserves, instead of allowing Medifund usage for the needy at Polyclinic out-patient treatment;

• More and more non-subsidised drugs and treatments and a refusal to disclose standardised drugs list like most countries do;

• A refusal to disclose Medifund applications success rates on a patients’ rejected basis, instead of total applications basis;

• A refusal to make public the criteria for approving Medifund applications;

• Longer and longer waiting times for practically all types of subsidised medical treatment – up to years for dental;

• Continuing to shift the burden of healthcare financing ratio of public/private spending from 75:25 to about 50:50 now;

• About half of Medisave account holders’ Medisave being consumed for other family members – thus creating the likely future problem of insufficient funding for account holders as they grow older; and

• No transparency in the funding to public hospitals vis-à-vis the subsidies shown in patients ‘ hospital bills.

 

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【选举】林鼎抨击行动党恐惧政治、疫情下办选举

人民之声党领袖林鼎,在今日(8日 )最后一日竞选期,抨击行动党的恐惧政治,以及在疫情下举行选举。 此外,他也点评网络流传的原贸工部长陈振声的闭门会议外泄音频。他质疑过去行动党都配合危机的时机,召开选举以此拯救自身政党。 尽管目前选举已在进行,林鼎强调, 政府理应优先稳定疫情局势。而似乎现在是利用冠病19疫情的危机,举行选举希望能一举歼灭反对党。 然而,这等同要牺牲国人的性命安全,包括仍在上学的孩童和教师们。 有关流传音频相信是录制于去年1月9日,在行动党武吉班让西北分部的一个闭门会议。当时陈振声向与会的60名出席者,谈到过去40年行动党的选情模式。 尽管他强调党员仍需去做好正确的事,不过他也分析,上届选举,已故建国总理李光耀的逝世拯救了行动党,在上届是911危机等。 至于稍早前陈振声已回应,录音部分被断章取义,却被恶意公开流传。它本身则希望国人能理解他演说的情境,包括赢得选举和九天的竞选活动无关。关键在于多年的努力。

One Kopi, No Haze Please

  “One kopi!” Who would’ve thought that those two words could change…

振瑞路铁锅烧尸案:各机构单位对孩子失踪”并不起疑“

振瑞路铁锅烧尸案曾和多个社区组织和援助机构有过接触,据当时访视社工与相关官员与涉案家庭的接触,他们并不曾怀疑过孩子已失踪或可能面临生命危险。 社会及家庭发展部部长李智陞昨日(7日)在国会期间,针对案件作出回应,该涉案家庭已有不同的政府单位与民间机构接触,为该家庭提供经济援助、家庭福利以及儿童保育问题如学前教育等。 根据《亚洲新闻台》报导,李智陞也指出,教育部也有数项针对无法提供孩子登记小学一年级的措施,向这些家长伸出援手,除了发出通知信以外,亦会派遣官员前往家庭访视。他强调,如果孩子并不是和家长同住一屋檐下,教育部也会联络各个机构试图与孩子所寄住的家庭联络。 “该涉案家庭表示,他的孩子目前交由亲友照顾,而且一个两岁的孩子通常都不会是和机构互动的对象。” 李智陞也表示,目前已交由法庭处理,正在进行刑事诉讼调查,因此不便透露该案详情。另外,针对该涉案夫妻仍有其他孩子一事,该如何处置,李智陞表示社会及家庭发展部会持续提供孩子们的资源,确保他们的安全与福利能够被保障。 振瑞路铁锅烧尸案曝光后震惊社会,两名男女涉嫌于2014年3月在振瑞路的一个组屋单位,谋杀当时年仅两岁半的女童,嫌凶是女童的亲生父母。当时该单位传出浓烈的臭味,警方在接获通报后,发现厨房的铁锅中装有一具尸骸,骨骸几乎已经烧成灰烬。 警方在初步调查以为尸骸是一个胚胎,但其后证实死者是一名两岁半的女童,可能已经死亡超过五年,而涉案凶手是女童的亲生父母(男三十一岁,女三十岁),为保护受害人与家属身份,法庭已发出限制令,禁止报道被告身份。 目前两名被告已被还押,正接受精神鉴定,而其母亲则因毒品与盗窃相关罪行被判处五年两个月的监禁。

Who is telling the truth – STOMP or SMRT?

~ By Cheong Yaoming ~ The story about the SMRT train door remaining…