by Deborah Choo/

 

Picture: kalayaanuk.blogspot.com

As I waited at the reception area of a shelter for domestic workers run by the Humanitarian Organization for Migration Economics (HOME), a pale and frail looking lady walked in with a companion. Her eyes were slightly swollen, her cheeks were stained with dried tears, and her hands and legs were covered with scars from allergic reactions.

“Be gentle with her, she’s still visibly upset,” said her companion, HOME President Bridget Tan to me as I sat the lady down for my interview.

Managing a faint smile, the lady shakily introduced herself as Eliza (not her real name). She had been brought to the shelter by the police. The police were involved when her employer’s sister, whose apartment she resides at, had lodged a missing person report.

Eliza had run away from her employer less than a week ago because she was overworked from serving two families due to illegal deployment on her employer’s part. She is also suffering from skin allergies that resulted from being forced to hand wash clothing.

Her story is no isolated occurrence in Singapore, where women from poorer nations in the region flock in search of work and increased earnings. HOME says that each year, as many as 360 foreign domestic workers flee from their employers, seeking shelter and help from them.

Four months ago, Eliza set foot in Singapore hoping to land a job that would earn her more money for her son’s education back in the Philippines. Her husband works as a farmer and she was formerly working as a secretary. She only earned 3,600 pesos a month (equivalent to about S$104.50) back home. Her son turns five this May, and will start attending school in June.

Borrowing 5,000 pesos (approximately S$250) from her father to pay the Filipino agent, Eliza came to Singapore and registered with the agency Maid Care. It was the first time she had ever travelled out of the Philippines. Although she was scared and all alone in this foreign land, she sought comfort in the knowledge that her son would be able to have a bright future.

But on the first day of employment, she realized that she was going to be living at her employer Mr Chin’s (not his real name) sister’s place, not the address stated on her work permit.

For the next four months, she worked from 5.45 am to 10pm everyday, serving two families. At Mr Chin’s sister’s residence alone, she serves a total of eight people in a four-room flat – Mr Chin’s sister and her husband (whom she addresses as “ma’am” and “sir”), their four children, her father and his sister.

Other than the household chores she did at Ma’am’s house, she was also responsible for caring for Mr Chin’s three-year-old son.  “Looking at him reminds me of my son,” she sobbed. “Every time I call home, he asks me to go home. I really miss him.”

Once a week, her employers entertained. There were a few occasions when she was sound asleep at midnight and was woken by her Ma’am to wash the dishes and clean the area after their visitors had left. Until she was done, she was not allowed to sleep.

Upon receiving her first month’s pay of only $10, Eliza was then informed by her agent upon enquiry that the first eight months of her pay had to be paid to the agency to defray the loan costs. She was also told that during the first two years of her employment, she would not be allowed to have a day off at all. Her heart fell, but even then she clung on to the hope that she could start remitting her income back by December. She continued to work hard.

Two months ago, her allergies began to surface because she had to do all the laundry by hand. The family’s washing machine had broken down and her workload had increased. As her skin allergies got worse she asked her Ma’am to see if they could get a new washing machine. Her Ma’am brushed off her request, saying her husband would fix it. After a month, the washing machine still had not been replaced and Eliza’s skin problems spread to her legs as well.

It was then that she tried calling the agency. However, on both occasions she couldn’t get through. She then asked her Sir and Ma’am if she could make a trip back to the agency. Permission was denied. “Ma’am told me that once my hands are cured, then I can go back,” Eliza said.

However, laundry duties went on. The family did not buy a new washing machine. Instead, Eliza was given a pair of gloves to wear. She was also brought to the doctor twice and received an injection the first time. Still the allergies showed no signs of improvement.

Unable to bear it any longer, she ran away on March 24, 2011. She immediately went to the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) to seek help. She was then brought by officer “Sir Chris” (as she calls him) to her Filipino agent’s house in Singapore.

The police soon contacted her, as her Sir and Ma’am had made a police report of a missing person. She made a trip down to Ang Mo Kio police station, at the end of which she was given three options: (1) go back to the maid agency, (2) stay at the Philippines embassy (the police had tried contacting the embassy but there was no answer) and (3) stay at the HOME shelter. She chose the third option.

Eliza confessed that at times she regretted coming to Singapore as she had not expected things to turn out this way. Currently, she is in debt, with no personal belongings to speak of other than her handphone, used to call home. When told that she did not have to worry about anything and that the shelter has clothes, toothbrushes and toothpaste for her, tears streamed down her cheeks as she thanked Bridget profusely.

When asked about her plans, she said “I don’t know.  I’m so confused.” Bridget advised that it was now most important for Eliza to take a good rest and nurse her body back to health.

“We will contact MOM to follow up on her case. She will have to wait here in Singapore until the investigations are over,” said Bridget.

She added that HOME recently set up a fund called the Witness Assistance Scheme for Prosecution (WASP), where funds will go into helping the foreign domestic workers involved in MOM investigations. Money will go towards helping their families get by back in their hometowns while the ladies are here, most of whom are unemployed, some with outstanding loans, like in the case of Eliza.

To find out more about HOME, click here.

If you wish to support HOME by giving donations, please click here.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Company fined $44,500 for unauthorised excavation works and damage to water main

Construction company Megastone Holdings Pte Ltd was fined $44,500 for carrying out…

公用事业局:按原计划周六接管大泉海水淡化厂

据了解,尽管有阿拉伯联合酋长国事业集团Utico等提出报价,有意投资凯发集团(Hyflux),然而公用事业局仍会按照原定计划,在本周六(18日)接管大泉海水淡化厂。 公用事业局是在上月17日发文告,表示为了保障新加坡水资源,正式向凯发集团旗下的大泉水电厂,发出终止购水协议(WPA)的通知,并将接管大泉海水淡化厂。 凯发集团原本有印尼财团SM投资注资5亿3000万元助凯发重组,但后来凯发突然宣布终止重组协议。 当时凯发向投资者保证,会继续寻求可行的策略,在法庭监督下完成重组过程。 但是公用事业局在受《亚洲新闻台》询问,表示仍会照原计划接管大泉水厂。 在本月初,凯发表示包括基金公司Oyster Bay Fund和阿联酋Utico,都有意投资凯发。 其中阿联酋Utico有意注资四亿新元,也将为凯发注入营运资本和其他急需应用的资金。 阿联酋总裁告诉路透社,针对投资凯发事宜将与公用事业局洽谈。 “我们上周提交了有约束力的条款清单,寻求可令所有利益相关者满意的交易。” 上周,法庭已驳回银行债权人,将凯发交由司法管理的申请。同时,延长凯发债务延期偿付令(moratorium)期限,延长至本月29日。…

Malaysian AGC contradicts AG’s directions in the case of a Singaporean Man

On October 9 2018, the Malaysian Immigration Department detained Gilbert Louis, a…

Singtel's investee company Bharti Airtel to pay Indian govt USD3b in past due

It was reported on Bloomberg yesterday (24 Oct) that India’s Supreme Court…