Leong Sze Hian/

I refer to the article “Supply of rental flats to increase” (Today, May 30).

I would like to applaud the Minister for making this bold policy change, despite being just less than three weeks on the job in his new ministry.

With regard to the Minister’s remarks “we need to ramp up the building of rental flats as quickly as we can. Not just by a few thousand, actually we need to build by tens of thousands. And the earlier the
better”, I would like to suggest that the policy of allowing private operators, like EM Services, which is a joint-venture between the HDB and a private listed company, to rent out HDB flats to non-Singaporeans for profit, be reviewed.

Freeze new lease for foreigners

For example, there could be a freeze on new applications for such rentals and no more renewals as and when existing leases expire, so that the 2200 of such SERS (Selective En-bloc Re-Development Scheme)
flats may be rented to needy Singaporeans in the HDB rental queue instead.

Review policies – not just build more?
We could also review the following policies:-

  • The $1,500 household income ceiling, as it does not take into account a household’s financial situation – for example, a very large family, families with disabled or chronically sick members, etc.
  • Lowering the average interim housing scheme’s rent of about $400 for a room rental , which is not very much lower than the open market, considering that only financially stressed familes that are referred by the HDB can qualify for this scheme.
  • The policy change to increase the rental for households earning more than $800 after two years, as a family earning between $800 and $1,500, may already be finding it hard to make ends meet.
  • The policy change to permanently bar those who have sold two HDB flats from renting a HDB flat, as it assumes that one can never be in financial difficulty after selling one’s flat, no matter how long ago.
  • The 30 months waiting period after selling one’s flat, before one can apply for a rental flat, as adding the queuing time after applying may mean a total wait of around four years on the average.

We need statistics

Finally, we should also disclose the following statistics:-

How many foreigners and PRs in total are staying in SERS HDB flats, former JTC, SIT, etc, flats as rental tenants?

How many HDB rental flat tenants have been evicted for failing to pay rents?

How many families have been housed under the Interim Housing Scheme? How many families in the Interim Housing Scheme have been evicted for failing to pay rents?

Support TOC! Buy Leong Sze Hian’s book here!

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Malaysia to remain “steadfast in negotiating”, refuses to “compromise our interests”: Foreign Minister Saifuddin Abdullah on bilateral disputes with Singapore

Malaysia will remain “steadfast in negotiating” with Singapore regarding the bilateral territorial…

Media Literacy Council welcomes its 17 new members

The Minister for Communication and Information Yaacob Ibrahim appointed 17 new members to…

市民吁C级病房备空调 卫生部回复:去住A或B1病房!

市民莉莉(译名,Lily Ong)于日前投函《海峡时报》,申诉本地医院的津贴病房缺乏空调设备。卫生部在数日后复函,对有关的空调课题给出理由,并且表示已采取数项措施,以便解决。但是有关的理由和现实写照一对比,反而令人感到不能理解了。“难道医院的美观,比病患的舒适程度来得重要吗?” 莉莉在信中表达意见,提到C级病房的住院患者,仿佛笼罩在闷热氛围中,只因为没有空调。 信中写道,她发现很多C级病房的患者都是年长者,因此她建议应在病房内安装空调设备。她认为,在这个炎热潮湿的国家,以及受到全区暖化影响的现在,空调已然是个基本必需品。 她也指出,新加坡国际事务研究所预测,今年我国还会面对严重烟霾问题,但医院还让患者躺在敞开的窗户旁边,岂非令病患曝露在空气污染引起的健康隐忧? 莉莉的信函引起了卫生部的关注。卫生部的回函于上周(6月8日)在《海时》刊出。 为病患提供可负担病房 卫生部政策及基础设施规划主任Low Chian Siong,在回函中写道,“想住有空调设备病房的病患,可选择入住A级或B1级病房”。 他在信件中阐述了我国公立医院,为患者提供了安全、可负担和有效医疗护理,并且为了提供病患可负担的补贴病房,有关病房的设计旨在满足患者的基本需求。 已采取数项降温措施…